Notes

Appeal Court upholds ruling: army needn’t compensate for shooting activist
A human rights activist who was shot by the army in 2017 at a checkpoint in Chiang Mai just isn't entitled to compensation according to the Appeal Court. Yesterday the courtroom upheld a earlier ruling by the Civil Court that dismiss the lawsuit arguing that the army pay compensation to the household of Lahu human rights activist Chaiyaphum Pasae.
The court docket listening to lasted about an hour yesterday and was attended by legal representatives for the army as properly as human rights defender Angkhana Neelapaiji and human rights lawyer Janjira Janpaew. It occurred on the Civil Court which read the choice of the Appeal Court.
The Lahu are an ethnic Chinese tribe that is certainly one of 6 hill tribes living in the north of Thailand with an estimated inhabitants of about 100,000 folks, and Chaiyaphum was a teenage Lahu activist that was stopped at a checkpoint and accused of drug trafficking. Accounts of his killing from local witnesses and from the army are wildly totally different, with villagers saying he was dragged from his automobile, overwhelmed and stomped. After the military fired 2 warning pictures, he tried to flee and was then shot to dying.
The army says that they found 2,800 meth pills in his automotive which have been by no means revealed and that he attacked troopers with a knife earlier than making an attempt to detonate a hand grenade inflicting the military to shoot him in self-defence. There was ผลไม้แช่อิ่ม on the knife and his DNA was found on the grenade but not on the pin. The complete incident was said to be captured on CCTV but by way of a quantity of steps of bungling the original footage was mentioned to have been misplaced and later mentioned to not have existed.
The lawyer representing the military in court docket stated that there was no have to compensate Chaiyaphum’s family as he was killed by an official weapon by a soldier used in self-defence and out of necessity. The court case has gone by way of a collection of twists and turns after being filed initially in May of 2019 by his mother. The Civil Court dismissed the case in October 2020 saying the military officers acted in self-defence.
The incident drew national outrage initially as another Lahu man was stopped and killed at the identical checkpoint with the exact same reasoning. The Army claimed to have CCTV footage proving their story and submitted a tough drive to the Royal Thai police who said they didn’t discover footage of the incident on it. The next month they despatched the original drive to the Central Police Forensic Science Division though to this day the video has by no means been shared with the common public and even with Chaiyaphum’s family or their authorized representation.
The third area Army Chief stated he had seen the footage and he would have opened fire as an alternative of only firing a couple of shots. The Chiang Mai Provincial Court ruled that the video footage was not necessary and that that they had sufficient evidence to dismiss the declare against the army without it. In the meantime, many of Chaiyaphum’s members of the family spoke out towards the handling of the case and were arrested on drug costs subsequently..
Read More: https://aioondriedfruit.com/