Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the distribution of referrals to pelvic floor physical therapy throughout the United States and to identify specialties with the highest and lowest referral rates. Referral networks to pelvic floor physical therapy were identified, and factors associated with referral connections were determined.
This retrospective network analysis of referrals examined U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data from 2009 to 2017. Pelvic floor physical therapists were identified, and their patient-sharing networks were modeled using social network analytics.
There were 18,740 Medicare beneficiaries referred to pelvic floor physical therapists between 2009 and 2017. The mean number of referrals to each physical therapy provider or practice was 82 (SD ±46.3). Half of the referrals were made by a general acute care hospital. The remainder were referred by female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeons, nurse practitioners, colorectal surgeons, internal medicine, and obelvic floor physical therapy are recommended as some ways to amend these fractured networks.
This study aimed to assess and trend fears surrounding elective surgery and office procedures in benign gynecologic and urogynecologic patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Recruitment occurred from June 23, 2020, to March 23, 2021. Females 18 years or older presenting for elective benign gynecologic or urogynecologic surgery or office procedures were eligible. Patients were excluded if non-English speaking or undergoing an emergent procedure or surgery. Fear was assessed by the Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ), which was also modified to include 2-4 additional questions pertaining to COVID-19 (modified version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire [mSFQ]). Total SFQ scores and short- and long-term fear scores were compared between procedures and surgery and to historic data.
A total of 209 patients undergoing 107 procedures or 102 surgical procedures completed the questionnaire. Participants were separated into subgroupan historic data.
Fear of surgery and office procedures was low and consistent throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and lower than historic data.
Understanding women's acceptance of telemedicine as a model of care for pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) allows for a more patient-centered approach to widespread implementation in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.
The pandemic sparked rapid and widespread implementation of telemedicine. Our goal was to assess acceptance, satisfaction, and desire for future use of telemedicine among women seeking care for PFDs.
We performed a structured telephone survey of new patients who underwent video visits, and established patients who underwent video or telephone visits, when nonurgent, in-person visits were suspended. Our survey assessed the following domains satisfaction, future use of telemedicine, level of comfort, perceived utility, and access and comfort with technology.
Between April and July 2020, we conducted telemedicine visits with 221 patients, 131 (63% of eligible patients) of whom agreed to participate in our survey (63 (74%) telephone and 68 (56%) video, including 35 established and 33 new patients). Overall, most participants (96.3%) described being "very" or "somewhat satisfied" with telemedicine in addressing their needs and "comfortable" sharing personal information with providers in a telemedicine visit (94.7%). However, video participants (both new and established) were more likely to view telemedicine as valuable (P = 0.02) than telephone participants. Furthermore, established video participants perceived greater quality care of care (P = 0.01) than telephone participants.
Video telemedicine is a well-accepted adjunct model of care with the potential to expand the reach of quality subspecialty care of value to women with PFDs.
Video telemedicine is a well-accepted adjunct model of care with the potential to expand the reach of quality subspecialty care of value to women with PFDs.
The primary objective was to evaluate the use of a novel video for enhancing patient knowledge of midurethral sling compared with standard handout.
Participants scheduled for midurethral sling were randomized to 1 of 2 preoperative educational interventions, either video or standard handout. The primary outcome was change in knowledge measured via a 15-question questionnaire completed immediately before and after the intervention. Secondary outcomes were knowledge retention, urinary symptoms, decision satisfaction, and regret measured via validated questionnaires at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data are presented as median (interquartile range) and comparisons between intervention groups made using non-parametric statistics. A sample size of 16 per arm was calculated to detect a 20% effect size.
Thirty-eight participants, 19 per site, were randomized from August 2019 to October 2020 and 37 (97%) completed the primary outcome per protocol. Median age was 51 years (18 years), and there were no significant demographic differences between groups. Participants randomized to video demonstrated greater change in knowledge than those randomized to handout (+8.5 (3) vs +2.0 (4), P < 0.0001). Those randomized to video demonstrated improved 6 week postoperative urinary symptoms (Urogenital Distress Inventory-6, 0.0 [8.3] vs 14.6 [26.0]; P = 0.02; Incontinence Severity Index, 0.0 [2] vs 3.0 [4]; P = 0.005). There were no differences in satisfaction with decision (5.0 [0] video vs 5.0 [0.9] handout; P = 0.48) or decision regret (1.0 [0.5] video vs 1.0 [0.8] handout; P = 0.80) at 6 weeks postoperatively.
A preoperative educational video improved knowledge and urinary symptoms after midurethral sling compared with a standard handout.
A preoperative educational video improved knowledge and urinary symptoms after midurethral sling compared with a standard handout.
The aim of the study was to compare national surgical practice patterns of performing apical suspension procedures (ASPs) at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) before and after the publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) 2017 Practice Bulletin on POP.
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for hysterectomy cases performed for POP indications for the years 2015-2016 and 2018-2019. The primary outcome was the use of ASP at the time of hysterectomy for POP. Secondary outcomes included the use of anterior, posterior, and paravaginal prolapse repair procedures. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with performing a hysterectomy without an ASP.
A total of 11,336 cases were included, and apical prolapse was the primary POP diagnosis in 86.3% of these cases. There was no statistically significant change in the utilization of ASPs in 2018-2019 compared with 2015-2016 (51.4% vs 49.8%, P = 0.081). Urogynecologists were significantly more likely than general gynecologists to perform ASPs (65.6% vs 37.5%, P < 0.001), which was confirmed on multivariable logistic regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 3.257; P < 0.001). The use of concomitant anterior repairs (44.1% vs 39.5%, P < 0.001) and posterior repairs (47.5% vs 41.3%, P < 0.001) increased in the 2018-2019 cohort.
There was no overall increase in the utilization of concomitant ASPs at the time of hysterectomy done for POP indications despite the 2017 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin. Urogynecologists were more likely to perform ASPs than general gynecologists.
There was no overall increase in the utilization of concomitant ASPs at the time of hysterectomy done for POP indications despite the 2017 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin. Urogynecologists were more likely to perform ASPs than general gynecologists.
d-Mannose is a promising nonantibiotic prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI). Recurrent UTI is common in postmenopausal women and may be especially prevalent in those with cystitis cystica (CC) lesions found on cystoscopy. Our objectives were to determine whether CC lesions are associated with a higher UTI incidence rate and whether d-mannose reduces this rate in women with CC.
This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with rUTI who underwent cystoscopy at our institution (from which CC status was identified) and who were treated with d-mannose as a single agent for UTI prophylaxis. Participants were required to have at least 1 year of follow-up for UTIs both before and after d-mannose initiation to allow for a pre-post comparison.
Twenty-seven patients were included in the analysis (13 with CC, 14 without CC). CFT8634 Most patients (88.9%) were postmenopausal. Patients with CC had a higher UTI incidence rate than patients without CC (4.69 vs 2.93 UTIs/year before starting d-mannose prophylaxis, P = 0.021). After initiating d-mannose prophylaxis, the UTI incidence rate decreased significantly in patients with CC (rate decrease = 2.23 UTIs/year, P = 0.0028). This decrease was similar in magnitude to that observed in patients without CC (rate decrease = 1.64 UTIs/year, P = 0.0007; P interaction = 0.58).
Patients with rUTI with CC had more frequent UTI episodes than patients without CC. Patients in both groups had fewer UTI episodes after beginning d-mannose prophylaxis. These findings add to the body of literature supporting d-mannose for the prevention of rUTI in women, including those with CC.
Patients with rUTI with CC had more frequent UTI episodes than patients without CC. Patients in both groups had fewer UTI episodes after beginning d-mannose prophylaxis. These findings add to the body of literature supporting d-mannose for the prevention of rUTI in women, including those with CC.
There is little consensus on an effective nonantibiotic agent for the prevention of urinary tract infection (UTI) after pelvic reconstructive surgery.
The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of methenamine hippurate with cranberry capsules on rates of UTI after pelvic reconstructive surgery, among patients requiring short-term catheterization.
In this randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled trial, patients discharged with a catheter after pelvic reconstructive surgery were approached to participate. Participants were randomized to receive cranberry with methenamine or cranberry with placebo. Primary outcome was number of UTIs treated within 1 week after surgery. Secondary outcomes included incidence of UTIs treated within 6 weeks postoperatively, bacterial species on culture, urinary pH, catheter duration, patient adherence, and satisfaction. A sample size of 88 participants per arm was planned.
From June 2019 to July 2021, 185 patients were randomized and 182 analyzed; 89 received plcation after pelvic surgery.
Antimuscarinic medications are often discontinued, and there is a paucity of data regarding patient experience of medications within this class.
The objective of this study is to qualitatively explore patient experience of antimuscarinic medications used for overactive bladder using reviews on Drugs.com.
We examined reviews prior to February 2, 2020 (available since 2008) for oral antimuscarinic medications. User content was reviewed qualitatively via inductive content analysis. Investigators coded third-party impressions, categorizing each review as positive, mostly positive, mostly negative, or negative. The prevalence of side effects, themes, and impressions are described, with comparisons by drug using χ2, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, as appropriate. Correlation between ordinal and categorical variables was performed using Tau and Spearman correlation coefficients, respectively.
We analyzed 469 user reviews. 68.2% reported symptom improvement. The most common side effects were dry mouth (29%) and fatigue (10.
Homepage: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/cft8634.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team