Notes

Conservative compared to personalized surgical treatment in patients together with very first time lateral patella dislocation: a randomized-controlled demo.
inicians, researchers, and health care decision-makers to explore potential modifications in recommendations and practice guidelines. © AlphaMed Press 2019.LESSONS LEARNED The biweekly GEM plus CBDCA dose and schedule showed satisfactory efficacy with mild toxicities in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. The biweekly GEM plus CBDCA regimen could be considered an alternative to the 3-week regimen in NSCLC. BACKGROUND The gemcitabine (GEM)-carboplatin (CBDCA) combination is widely used for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and has some efficacy in elderly patients; however, a high incidence of thrombocytopenia is observed, and the optimal dosage and administration schedules are unknown. This multicenter phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of GEM-CBDCA for elderly patients with chemotherapy-naive NSCLC. METHODS Patients with chemotherapy-naive performance status 0-1 and with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were administered chemotherapy biweekly (GEM 1,000 mg/m2 with CBDCA area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) 3 on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Forty-eight patients were enrolled. Median age was 76 years (range, 70-83); 35 patients were men (73%), and 27 patients had adenocarcinoma (56%). The ORR was 29.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.0-44.1). The median PFS, median OS, and 1-year survival was 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.6), 13.3 months (95% CI, 8.3-23.5), and 58%, respectively. Grade ≥3 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (29.2%), thrombocytopenia (4.2%), and anemia (20.8%). The incidence of grade ≥3 nonhematological toxicities was less then 5%. CONCLUSION This GEM-CBDCA combination administered biweekly showed satisfactory efficacy with mild toxicities in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/taurochenodeoxycholic-acid.html © AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.BACKGROUND NEPA, a combination antiemetic of a neurokinin-1 (NK1 ) receptor antagonist (RA) (netupitant [oral]/fosnetupitant [intravenous; IV]) and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron] offers 5-day CINV prevention with a single dose. Fosnetupitant solution contains no allergenic excipients, surfactant, emulsifier, or solubility enhancer. A phase III study of patients receiving cisplatin found no infusion-site or anaphylactic reactions related to IV NEPA. However, hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis have been reported with other IV NK1 RAs, particularly fosaprepitant in patients receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of IV NEPA in the AC setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS This phase IIIb, multinational, randomized, double-blind study enrolled females with breast cancer naive to highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive a single 30-minute infusion of IV NEPA or single oral NEPA capsule on day 1 prior to AC, in adherence to antiemetic guidelines. In this randomized multinational phase IIIb study, intravenous (IV) NEPA (fosnetupitant/palonosetron) was safe and highly effective in patients receiving multiple cycles of anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy. Unlike other IV NK1 RAs, the IV NEPA combination solution does not require any surfactant, emulsifier, or solubility enhancer and contains no allergenic excipients. Hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis have been reported with other IV NK1 RAs, most commonly with fosaprepitant in the AC setting. Importantly, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. © 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.BACKGROUND Direct comparisons between Guardant360 (G360) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and FoundationOne (F1) tumor biopsy genomic profiling in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are limited. We aim to assess the concordance across overlapping genes tested in both F1 and G360 in patients with mCRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients with mCRC who underwent G360 and F1 testing. We evaluated the concordance among gene mutations tested by both G360 and F1 among three categories of patients untreated, treated without, and treated with EGFR inhibitors, while considering the clonal and/or subclonal nature of each genomic alteration. RESULTS There was a high rate of concordance in APC, TP53, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in the treatment-naive and non-anti-EGFR-treated cohorts. There was increased discordance in the anti-EGFR treated patients in three drivers of anti-EGFR resistance KRAS, NRAS, and EGFR somatic mutations. Based on percentage of ctDNA, discordant somatic mutations were mo were treatment naive and treated with non-anti-EGFR therapy prior to ctDNA testing. This suggests that ctDNA genomic analysis may potentially be used as an alternative to tumor biopsy to identify appropriate patients for treatment selection in mCRC, but larger prospective studies are needed to further validate concordance among tissue and ctDNA tumor profiling. © AlphaMed Press 2019.Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Affected patients frequently experience debilitating disease-related symptoms, including dyspnea, cough, fatigue, anxiety, depression, insomnia, and pain, despite the progresses achieved in term of treatment efficacy. Physical activity and exercise are nonpharmacological interventions that have been shown to improve fatigue, quality of life, cardiorespiratory fitness, pulmonary function, muscle mass and strength, and psychological status in patients with lung cancer. Moreover, physical fitness levels, especially cardiorespiratory endurance and muscular strength, are demonstrated to be independent predictors of survival. Nevertheless, patients with lung cancer frequently present insufficient levels of physical activity and exercise, and these may contribute to quality of life impairment, reduction in functional capacity with skeletal muscle atrophy or weakness, and worsening of symptoms, particularly dyspnea. The molecular bases underlying the potential impact of exercise on the fitness and treatment outcome of patients with lung cancer are still elusive.
Here's my website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/taurochenodeoxycholic-acid.html