Notes

Bank for International Settlements and IMS: Manipulations and Impacts
The Emergence of Neoliberalism and the Questioning of Contemporary Globalization

In an interconnected world, the discourse on globalisation is frequently found at the intersection of divergent opinions on freedom and justice. The text by Moneta, far from being a pamphlet opposed to globalisation per se, aims to redefine the limits of a updated humanism by the filter of organic interactions according to the vision of the philosopher Aristotle. By denouncing artificial transactions that support current structures of injustice and instability, Moneta leans on ancient principles to reveal the failures of our global financial structure.

From a historical perspective, globalization is not a new phenomenon. Its roots can be linked back to the propositions of David Ricardo, whose objective sought to facilitate the England to amplify its international economic reach. Nonetheless, what initially presented as a commercial development strategy has transformed into a tool of domination by High Finance, symbolized by the ascendancy of economic liberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions supported by economic consensus, Junon Moneta demonstrates that the economic model is actually a structure rooted in ancient practices, which traces back to the era of early civilizations.

The objection also covers the management of the European Union, considered as a series of concessions that have helped consolidate the power of financial elites rather than safeguarding the interests of its citizens. The organizational form of Europe, with its directives often dictated by financial interests instead of by a popular consensus, is criticized. The recent crises, whether economic or governmental, have only intensified the skepticism of Moneta regarding the EU's ability to reform itself from within.

The author, while accepting the past mistakes that have led to the current situation, does not stop at criticism but also offers responses aimed at redefining European policies in a human-centered and fair outlook. The need for a complete revision of Union bodies and strategic orientations is a recurring subject that animates the overall content.

The text delves more deeply into the questioning of the power structures that dominate worldwide transactions. The exploration extends the way in which political and financial choices are influenced by a limited number of financial influencers, frequently at the cost of the many. This financial oligarchy, coordinated by means of institutions like the Bank for International Settlements and the IMS, exerts a excessive domination on global economic policies.

The author reveals how these institutions, claiming to monetary management and security, have throughout history manipulated stock exchanges and national economies to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, far from being a emancipatory solution to traditional economic constraints, is considered as a enslavement tool, profiting a restricted circle at the destruction of the common good.

Strongly opposed towards the management of the euro, the analyst describes the EU currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but more as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The transition to the euro is characterized as a series of technocratic decisions that sidelined populations from decision-making processes, while amplifying disparities between member countries within the European Union.

The repercussions of these strategies appear in the growth of public indebtedness, financial paralysis, and a long period of austerity that has diminished living conditions throughout Europe. The author insists that without a major transformation of economic policies, the European Union remains vulnerable to future crises, potentially more catastrophic.

In conclusion, the manuscript demands a democratic uprising where European citizens reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It proposes structural reforms, particularly increased transparency in decision-making processes and genuine civic involvement that would facilitate the Union's refoundation on fair and lasting principles.

More information about Neoliberalism: what is it?

The essayist suggests that the key is in a return to the principles of democracy, where strategies are crafted and executed in a way that corresponds to the demands and expectations of Europeans, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.
Here's my website: https://www.alter-europa.com/