Notes

Federal Employers: What's The Only Thing Nobody Is Talking About
Workers Compensation Vs Federal Employers Liability Act

Workers in high-risk industries who are injured are typically protected by laws that require employers to higher standards of safety. Federal Employers' Liability Act is one example. It protects railroad workers.

In order to recover damages under FELA workers must prove their injury was caused at least partially due to negligence on the part of the employer.

Workers' Compensation vs. FELA

While both workers' compensation and FELA are laws that offer protections to employees, there are significant differences between them. These distinctions are related to the claims process as well as fault evaluation, and the types of damages awarded for death or injury. Workers' compensation law gives quick relief to injured workers regardless of who was at fault for the accident. FELA requires that claimants show that their railroad employer is at least partially responsible for their injuries.

FELA also permits plaintiffs to sue federal courts in lieu of the state workers' compensation system, and allows for a trial by jury. It also establishes specific rules for determining damages. A worker can receive up to 80% of their average weekly wage plus medical expenses, and a reasonable cost-of-living benefit. A FELA lawsuit may also include compensation for discomfort and pain.

For a worker to succeed in a FELA case they must prove that negligence by the railroad played at least a small part in the injury or death. This is a more stringent requirement than that needed for a successful claim under workers' compensation. This requirement is a result of FELA's history. In 1908, Congress passed FELA to increase rail safety by permitting injured workers to seek damages.

As a result of over 100 years of FELA litigation railway companies are now able to implement safer equipment, but railway tracks, trains, yards and machine shops are among the most dangerous work environments. FELA is essential to ensure the safety of railway workers and to tackle employers' inability to protect their employees.

If you are a railway employee who was injured on the job it is imperative that you seek legal advice as quickly as possible. Contacting a BLET authorized legal counsel (DLC) firm is the best way to get started. Click this link to find a BLET-approved DLC firm in your area.

FELA vs. Jones Act

The Jones Act is federal law that allows seafarers to sue their employers for injuries or fatalities while on the job. The Jones Act was passed in 1920 as a means to protect sailors who put their lives at risk on the high seas or other navigable waters. They are not covered by workers' compensation laws, unlike employees who work on land. It was modeled on the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) which was which protects railroad employees. It was also crafted to satisfy the needs of maritime workers.

Unlike workers' compensation laws which limit the recovery for negligence to a maximum of an injured worker's lost wages, the Jones Act provides unlimited liability for maritime plaintiffs in cases that involve employer negligence. The Jones Act does not require plaintiffs to prove that an employer's negligence caused their death or injury. fela law firm allows injured seamen to sue their employers for damages that are not specified like future and past pain and suffering as well as future and past loss of earnings capacity and mental distress.

A claim for compensation by a seaman under the Jones Act may be brought in either a state or federal court. In a lawsuit brought under the Jones Act, plaintiffs have the right to a jury trial. This is a revolutionary approach to workers' compensation laws. Most of these laws are statutory in nature and do not give injured workers the right to a trial before a jury.

In the case Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Sorrell the US Supreme Court was asked to clarify whether a seaman's contribution to their own injury was subject to a stricter proof standard than in FELA claims. The Court ruled the lower courts were right when they ruled that the seaman had to prove that his role in the accident directly led to his injury.

Sorrell received US$1.5 million in compensation for his injuries. Norfolk Southern, Sorrell's employer claimed that the instructions given to the jury by the trial court were not correct in that they told the jury that Norfolk was solely accountable for the negligence that directly caused the injury. Norfolk asserted that the standard of causation should be the same in FELA and Jones Act cases.

Safety Appliance Act vs. FELA

The Federal Employers' Liability Act allows railroad workers to sue directly their employers for negligence that led to injuries. This is a major distinction for injured workers in high-risk sectors. After an accident, they can be compensated and maintain their families. The FELA was enacted in 1908 in recognition of the inherent dangers of the job and to establish standard liability requirements for companies that manage railroads.

FELA requires railroads to provide a safe work environment for their employees. This includes the use of properly repaired and maintained equipment. This includes everything from cars and locomotives to tracks, switches, and other safety equipment. To be successful, an injured worker must show that their employer violated their duty of responsibility by failing to provide them with a reasonably secure working environment, and that their injury resulted directly from this failure.

This requirement can be a challenge for some workers, particularly when a piece of equipment is involved in an accident. This is why having a lawyer who has expertise in FELA cases can be of assistance. A lawyer who understands the safety requirements for railroaders, as well as the regulations that govern these requirements, can help strengthen a worker's legal case by providing a solid legal foundation.

The Railroad Safety Appliance Act and the Locomotive Inspection Act are two railroad laws that could help strengthen the worker's FELA claim. These laws are referred to as "railway statutes" and mandate that rail corporations, and in certain cases their agents (like managers, supervisors or company executives) must follow these rules to ensure the safety of their employees. Infractions to these laws could be considered to be negligence in and of themselves, meaning that a violation can be considered sufficient to support a claim for injuries under the FELA.

A typical instance of a railroad statute violation is the case where an automatic coupler or grab iron isn't properly installed or is defective. If an employee is injured as a result of this, they could be entitled to compensation. The law stipulates that the claims of the plaintiff can be reduced if they were responsible in any way to the injury (even when the injury is not severe).


FELA vs. Boiler Inspection Act

FELA is a series of federal laws that allow railroad employees and their families to collect significant damages for injuries they sustained on the job. This includes compensation for loss of earnings and benefits such as medical costs or disability payments, as well as funeral expenses. If an injury causes permanent impairment or death, punitive damages could also be claimed. This is intended to punish the railroad for negligent acts and deter other railroads from engaging in similar behavior.

Congress passed FELA in 1908 as a result of public outrage over the appalling rate of fatalities and accidents on railroads. Prior to FELA there was no legal way for railroad workers to sue employers when they suffered injuries in the course of their work. Railroad workers who were injured and their families were frequently left without adequate financial support during the time that they could not work because of their injuries or the negligence of the railroad.

Railroad workers who are injured can bring claims for damages under FELA in either state or federal court. The law eliminated defenses like The Fellow Servant Doctrine and the assumption of risk and replaced them with a system of comparative blame. This means that the railroad worker's share of the blame for an accident is determined by comparing his actions to those of coworkers. The law allows for a trial by jury.

If a railroad carrier violates any of the federal railroad safety laws like The Safety Appliance Act or Boiler Inspection Act, it is held liable for any injuries that result. The railroad does not need to prove that it was negligent or that it contributed to an accident. It is also possible to file a claim under the Boiler Inspection Act when an employee is injured by exposure to diesel exhaust fumes.

If you have been injured while working as a railroad worker you should contact an experienced railroad injury lawyer right away. A reputable attorney can assist you in submitting your claim and receiving the highest amount of benefits for the time you aren't able to work because of the injury.

Website: https://vimeo.com/708075492