Notes

Here is a balanced perspective on whether “all-natural” or “organic” food is worth the higher price:
The debate around whether organic and all-natural foods are worth the premium price is complex and there are valid arguments on both sides. Proponents argue that organic farming avoids the use of synthetic pesticides, fertilizers, and other chemicals, which can be better for the environment and human health. Some studies have found slightly higher nutrient levels in organic produce compared to conventionally grown. Organic farming also supports more sustainable agricultural practices.
However, critics point out that the health and environmental benefits of organic foods are often overstated or inconclusive based on the available research. Many conventional farming methods also aim to minimize chemical use and employ sustainable practices. The organic certification process can also be costly, which gets passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices.
Ultimately, whether the premium for organic/all-natural is worthwhile comes down to individual preferences and priorities. Those concerned about pesticide exposure or supporting sustainable agriculture may find it valuable. But for others on a tighter budget, the small potential benefits may not justify the higher cost. The decision is a personal one based on one’s own needs and values. There are good-faith arguments on both sides of this complex issue.