Notes

In conclusion, the case of DPP v. Barut highlights the ongoing debate within the criminal justice system regarding the value of rehabilitation over punishment. Her Honour Judge Blair employed a thorough sentencing approach that maintained a balance between accountability and the prospect of Barut's recovery, emphasising the need of treating underlying problems such as drug abuse and mental health issues. Rehabilitative justice, despite criticism regarding effectiveness and resource allocation, is an effective technique for reducing recidivism and improving societal well-being.



While challenges remain, such as determining the suitability of rehabilitation for specific offenders and improving intervention strategies, the benefits of rehabilitation—including reduced prison overcrowding, lower recidivism rates, and improved community safety—are worth further investigation and investment. By prioritising rehabilitation activities targeted to individual needs and strengthening support networks, the justice system can shift toward a more equitable and successful approach to offender reintegration, ultimately producing a safer and more inclusive society.