Notes

The methods of evaluating students have changed in recent years. Traditional written tests is are being replaced by practical exams. This essay will take a closer close look at the benefits and drawbacks of this trend.
To begin with, what makes practical tests useful is the capability of testing students real ‘abilities. should be comma here Whereas written exam is created to check whether students understand as well as remember the lessons,should be full stop here practical examinations such as oral tests or presentations can be utilized to evaluate teamworking and making quick decisions skillsquick decision make skills. One more reasonthat suggests shifting form writing paper to practical assignments is that practical ones helps learners apply knowledge and theories into real life.this sentence is not talking about tests, but studying. With the traditional way of testing, some students may only review the lessons one day before the exam, and after that they are likely to forget what they have learned. On the other hand, experiments in practical tests aid students in remembering lessons in a longer time.

Nevertheless, this trend is not completely beneficial; there are some negative aspects that should be taken into consideration. The first disadvantage is the difficulty in grading a student‘s performance. It is obvious that the marking of practical tests has no fixed criteria and often relies on the perception of the examiner. Due to this, the new kind of evaluating seems to be biased. Furthermore, more time and money have to be spent to hold a practical exam in comparison with a traditional test as more human resources and facility is needed. For instance, oral examinations requires private rooms, recorders as well as interviewers.
In conclusion, the movement away from written tests to more practical assessment has its positive and negative aspects. However, if both types of examination is used wisely, the testing system would be impartial and efficient.