Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
After 1 year, 65% of the patients had improved or stable exocrine function.
Nonsurgical stone removal usually improved symptoms and preserved pancreatic exocrine function. Nonsurgical treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy followed by endoscopic treatment if needed is useful as initial management for pancreatolithiasis.
Nonsurgical stone removal usually improved symptoms and preserved pancreatic exocrine function. Nonsurgical treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy followed by endoscopic treatment if needed is useful as initial management for pancreatolithiasis.
The aim of this study was to show the real impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusion (PBT) on prognosis in patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Patients who underwent pancreatectomy between 2004 and 2018 were enrolled. Short- and long-term outcomes in patients who received PBT (PBT group) were compared with those who did not (non-PBT group).
From a total of 197 patients, 55 (27.9%) received PBT, and 142 (72.1%) did not. The PBT group displayed a higher level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (P = 0.02), larger tumor size (P < 0.001), and a higher rate of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.02), and underwent more frequent pancreaticoduodenectomy (P < 0.001) and portal vein resection (P < 0.001). Before matching, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the PBT group were significantly worse than the non-PBT group (RFS hazard ratio [HR], 1.73 [P = 0.002]; OS HR, 2.06 [P < 0.001]). After matching, RFS and OS in the PBT group were not significantly different from the non-PBT group (RFS HR, 1.44 [P = 0.15]; OS HR, 1.53 [P = 0.11]).
Our results show that PBT has no survival impact in patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Our results show that PBT has no survival impact in patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
The Enriching New-onset Diabetes for Pancreatic Cancer (END-PAC) model identified patients at high-risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) more than 6 months before diagnosis. The current study aimed to validate the END-PAC model using a large, state-mandated health care provider database.
A retrospective cohort study of patients older than 50 years that had a diagnosis of new-onset diabetes (NOD) between 2006 and 2015. A risk score was assigned according to the END-PAC model. Patients who developed PDAC over the 3-year period after NOD diagnosis were identified using the Israeli National Cancer Registry.
Twenty-three percent (1245/5408) of NOD patients were classified as high-risk, of them 32 (2.6%) developed PDAC. Median follow-up time from NOD detection to PDAC diagnosis was 609 days (interquartile range, 367-997). The hazard ratio for PDAC diagnosis among individuals at the high-risk group compared with the low-risk group was 5.70 (95% confidence interval, 2.93-11.06). Using the high-risk group as the screening threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the model were 54.2%, 76.98%, 2.57%, and 99.4%, respectively. Area under the curve of the model was 0.69.
Our findings support the robustness, generalizability and clinical applicability of the END-PAC model.
Our findings support the robustness, generalizability and clinical applicability of the END-PAC model.
Cigarette smoking is an established risk factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this project, we investigated the effect of smoking and the role of histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) in PDAC invasion and metastasis.
Cells were treated with 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone and cigarette smoke extract and the mRNA levels of HDACs were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Invasion was measured using the Matrigel Invasion Assay. Syngeneic PDAC mice were treated with 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone and metastasis measured. Human PDAC primary and metastatic tissues were analyzed by immunohistochemistry.
Levels of HDAC4 mRNA were increased by smoking. Smoking compounds significantly promoted invasion of cancer cells and promoted metastasis of PDAC cells to different organs, including the liver and the lung, whereas inhibition of HDAC4 prevented this effect. The effect of HDAC4 inhibition on preventing smoking-induced metastasis was greater in the liver compared with the lung. We found that HDAC4 is highly expressed in primary and metastatic PDAC tumors.
We found that HDAC4 is the only HDAC induced by smoking among all HDACs analyzed. We found that smoking promotes invasion and metastasis of PDAC cells through a mechanism that involves HDAC4 and that HDAC4 is a promising target for preventing PDAC metastasis.
We found that HDAC4 is the only HDAC induced by smoking among all HDACs analyzed. We found that smoking promotes invasion and metastasis of PDAC cells through a mechanism that involves HDAC4 and that HDAC4 is a promising target for preventing PDAC metastasis.
The concept of BRCAness has been proposed as a homologous recombination repair dysfunction triggered by a genetic defect in the BRCA pathway including the BRCA1/2 mutations. A certain number of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients have BRCAness. However, a large-scale analysis of BRCAness in PDAC has not been performed. In addition, no basic studies have examined the significance of BRCAness in PDAC cell lines.
Ninety-two patients who underwent surgery for PDAC were enrolled. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens of resected PDACs were used to analyze BRCAness by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. We also analyzed BRCAness in pancreatic cancer cell lines and the sensitivity to cisplatin and olaparib using a colony formation assay.
Of the 92 patients with PDAC, 6 were detected to have BRCAness-positive PDAC (6.5%). No significant differences in overall survival and progression-free survival were observed between the BRCAness-positive and BRCAness-negative groups. One PDAC cell line, KP-2, was positive for BRCAness and was more sensitive to cisplatin and olaparib than the BRCAness-negative cell lines.
Our results revealed that a considerable number of PDACs are positive for BRCAness, suggesting that BRCAness status could be a useful biomarker for selecting anticancer treatments for advanced or relapsed PDAC.
Our results revealed that a considerable number of PDACs are positive for BRCAness, suggesting that BRCAness status could be a useful biomarker for selecting anticancer treatments for advanced or relapsed PDAC.
Patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) are at risk for extrapancreatic complications (EPCs) when admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We assessed the prevalence of EPCs in non-ICU AP patients and their outcomes.
We retrospectively studied EPCs in non-ICU AP patients between 2008 and 2018. Outcomes such as length of stay (LOS), inpatient mortality, and 30-day readmission rates were compared between those with and without EPC.
Of the 830 AP patients, 151 (18.1%) had at least 1 EPC. These included urinary tract infection (15.9%), Clostridium difficile infection (17.2%), pneumonia (7.3%), bacteremia (17.2%), acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (3.3%), gastrointestinal bleeding (12.5%), alcohol withdrawal (24.5%), delirium (14.5%), and falls (1.32%). Patients with EPC had increased mean LOS (6.98 vs 4.42 days; P < 0.001) and 30-day readmissions (32.5% vs 19%; P < 0.001). On multivariate regression, EPCs were independently associated with higher LOS (odds ratio, 1.45 [95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.56]; P < 0.001) and 30-day readmissions (odds ratio, 1.94 [95% confidence interval 1.28-2.95]; P < 0.001).
The EPCs are common among noncritical AP patients and contribute to poor outcomes like increased LOS and 30-day readmissions.
The EPCs are common among noncritical AP patients and contribute to poor outcomes like increased LOS and 30-day readmissions.
This study aimed to understand if resection (RS) for nonmetastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) prolongs 5-year overall survival.
Patients from National Cancer Data Base with primary histologically confirmed SBNETs from 2007 to 2016 were included. Patients younger than 18 years, with the disease in the duodenum/Meckel diverticulum or metastatic disease were excluded. We assessed 5-year survival rates using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression after RS, nonresection surgical management (NRS), or no resection (NR). Multivariate models were adjusted with age, sex, race, insurance, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, academic facility, primary tumor location, clinical T, clinical N, stage, and grade.
We identified 4180 patients. On average, patients were 64 years old (standard deviation, 12 years), male (53%), and White (84%). The majority received RS (91.8%) as opposed to NRS (4.0%) or NR (4.2%). Patients who received RS versus NR had increased survival rates (84.2% vs 73.9%; univariate log-rank, P < 0.0001; multivariate hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.99; P = 0.04). No statistical difference in survival was observed for NRS versus NR.
To our knowledge, this is the first national study to evaluate survival after RS for nonmetastatic SBNETs. Results suggest that RS of SBNETs may prolong 5-year survival.
To our knowledge, this is the first national study to evaluate survival after RS for nonmetastatic SBNETs. Results suggest that RS of SBNETs may prolong 5-year survival.
Recently, 40 comprehensive quality indicators in various management domains were created. The aim was to determine if these indicators could be used to audit the management of acute pancreatitis.
A retrospective study of consecutive patients admitted with acute pancreatitis in 2018 was conducted. Adherence rates with the individual quality indicators were calculated and compared between services.
A total of 320 patients were included in this study. Twenty-eight of the 40 quality indicators (70%) could be used to audit management retrospectively. The medical service was found to have lower adherence rates for quality indicators 12 (initial assessment and risk stratification domain; 11% vs 22%, P = 0.009), 14 (initial management domain; 72% vs 88%, P = 0.003), and 33 (surgery domain; 83% vs 100%, P = 0.006). The surgical service was noted to have statistically significant lower adherence rates for quality indicators 4, 5, and 6 of the etiology domain (54% vs 72%, P = 0.002; 86% vs 96%, P = 0.004; and 45% vs 71%, P < 0.0001, respectively), and 21 of the nutrition domain (76% vs 93%, P < 0.0001).
We show that these quality indicators can be used to audit the management of acute pancreatitis in specific management domains.
We show that these quality indicators can be used to audit the management of acute pancreatitis in specific management domains.
Gastorenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (GEP-NET) tumors are the second most common tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. We aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features and factors affecting the prognosis of patients with GEP-NET.
Clinicopathological features of 158 patients were evaluated, including tumor location, TNM stage and grade, pathological features, presence of lymph nodes and distant metastases at the time of diagnosis, maximum tumor diameter and treatment details. Also, follow-up information was analyzed to discover possible prognostic factors.
The most common primary site is pancreas (45.6%, n = 72). Most of the GEP-NETs were nonfunctional (93.6%, n = 148). Of the 158 patients, 94 (59.5%) were grade 1, 46 (29.1%) grade 2, and 18 (11.4%) grade 3. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 82.3% (130/158), 61.4% (70/114), and 47.2% (35/74), respectively. In multivariate analysis, histological grade (P = 0.04) and TNM stage (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for survival in patients with GEP-NET.
Read More:
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team