Notes

CYP4V2 essential fatty acid omega hydroxylase, a druggable goal to treat metabolic related junk liver condition (MAFLD).
Objective To evaluate whether prophylactic dronabinol, a synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol, reduces pain during medical abortion. Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol up through 70 days of gestation. All participants received 800 mg of ibuprofen and were randomized to either 5 mg of oral dronabinol or a placebo 30 minutes before misoprostol administration. Participants used a text messaging service to report pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 (0=no pain, 10=worst pain). The primary outcome was maximum pain experienced during the 24 hours after misoprostol administration. Secondary outcomes were pain scores at 0, 6, and 24 hours after misoprostol administration; maximum anxiety and nausea scores; use of additional pain medication; reported side effects; and satisfaction (yes or no). We needed 68 participants (34 per group) to have 80% power to detect a 2-point difference in maximum pain on a numeric rating scale. Results From November 2018 to May 2019, we randomized 70 women (dronabinol=35, placebo=35). Participants in the study arms had comparable baseline characteristics. We found no difference between groups in the median maximum pain score reported (dronabinol 7 [interquartile range 6-8], placebo 7 [interquartile range 5-8], P=.82) or median pain scores at any timepoint. Groups were also no different in mean maximum anxiety (dronabinol 3.33 [SD 3.06], placebo 3.23 [SD 2.53], P=.88) or nausea scores (dronabinol 2.21 [SD 2.32], placebo 2.72 [SD 2.64], P=.41). Most women were satisfied with their pain management (76% dronabinol, 82% placebo, P=.51). Conclusion Dronabinol does not reduce the maximum level of pain experienced by women undergoing medical abortion. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03604341.Objective To estimate alcohol, tobacco, and recreational drug use during pregnancy among nulliparous women. Methods In a cohort of nulliparous women followed through pregnancy from the first-trimester nuMoM2b (Nulliparous Outcomes in Pregnancy Monitoring Mothers to be) study, self-reported use of alcohol, tobacco, and drugs was chronicled longitudinally at four study visits in this secondary analysis. Rates of use before pregnancy, in each trimester (visit 1, visit 2, visit 3, approximating each trimester), and at the time of delivery (visit 4) were recorded. The amount of alcohol, tobacco, and drug exposure were recorded using validated measures, and trends across pregnancy were analyzed. Results Of the 10,038 study participants, 10,028 had information regarding alcohol, tobacco, and drug use at visit 1, 9,412 at visit 2, 9,217 at visit 3, and 7,167 at visit 4. The rates of drinking alcohol, which had been 64.6% in the 3 months before pregnancy, were lower in pregnancy (3.9% at visit 1, 5.6% at visit 2, 7.0% at visit 3, and 6.1% at visit 4, P less then .001 for all). Rates later in pregnancy were all greater than in the first trimester (P less then .01). The rate of smoking in the 3 months before pregnancy, which was 17.8%, also declined at visit 1 (5.9%), and continued to decline through pregnancy (5.3% at visit 2, 4.7% at visit 3, and 3.9% at visit 4, with all rates lower than that of visit 1 [P less then .01]). Although recreational drug use was relatively common in the months before pregnancy (33.8%), it also declined during pregnancy (1.1% at visit 2, 0.7% at visit 3, 0.4% at visit 4). Conclusions In this geographically and ethnically diverse cohort of nulliparous women, rates of self-reported alcohol, smoking, and recreational drug use were all significantly lower during than before pregnancy. Nonetheless, rates of alcohol use rose as pregnancy progressed, highlighting the need for continued counseling throughout all trimesters of pregnancy. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01322529.Objective To estimate the rate of readmissions for postpartum venous thromboembolism (VTE) during the first 30 days postdelivery between women with and without the immediate postpartum insertion of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant. Methods The Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 was used to identify women with a singleton delivery, immediate postpartum insertion of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant, and readmission for VTE within 30 days of discharge. Those with a prior history of VTE or anticoagulant therapy were excluded. These women were compared with the number of women readmitted within 30 days for VTE who did not have the contraceptive implant placed during delivery admission. Results Of 3,387,120 deliveries, 8,369 women underwent etonogestrel contraceptive implant placement during the delivery admission. There was no difference identified in the rate of readmission for VTE between exposed and unexposed women. STAT5IN1 Of these, seven had received a postpartum etonogestrel contraceptive implant (0.85/1,000; 95% CI 0.22-1.45/1,000 deliveries), compared with 1,192 without an etonogestrel contraceptive implant (0.35/1,000; 95% CI 0.33-0.37/1,000 deliveries); odds ratio (OR) 2.41; 95% CI 0.58-9.89. The rates of diabetes, thrombophilia, systemic lupus erythematosus, and cesarean birth did not differ between groups. Women who underwent etonogestrel contraceptive implant placement were younger and were more likely to have government-sponsored health insurance, a smoking history, hypertension, peripartum infection, or postpartum hemorrhage than women who did not receive an etonogestrel contraceptive implant (P less then .001). After adjusting for these confounders, there remained no difference in rates of VTE, adjusted OR 1.81; 95% CI 0.44-7.45. Conclusion The immediate postpartum placement of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant was not associated with an increased rate of VTE; however, our sample size was underpowered to determine no difference.Background Women with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations have a lifetime risk of ovarian cancer of up to 46%. Opportunistic salpingectomy has been advocated as a risk-reducing strategy owing to increasing recognition of tubal origin, yet evidence of efficacy in this high-risk population is limited. Case This is the case of a woman with a BRCA1 mutation who underwent prophylactic mastectomy and bilateral salpingectomy with ovarian retention before the age of 40 years. She did not undergo oophorectomy and subsequently developed stage IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer 4 years after her initial surgery. Conclusion More research is needed to determine the role of prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy, optimal timing of completion oophorectomy, and the risks and benefits compared with up-front risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
Here's my website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/stat-in-1.html