Notesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb108/eb108e1225c6a34726896a3a71243e18df6f7721" alt="what is notes.io? What is notes.io?"
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
The level of MRV was also significantly correlated to the Cobb angle in both the main thoracic curve and lumbar curve. The types of structural curves proximal to major structural curves, such as type 2, 4, and 6, demonstrated more severe rotational and coronal plane deformities as compared with types 1, 3, and5.
Curves with different Lenke types demonstrated different levels of MRV and severity of rotation. The results suggest that different center levels of rotation, signified by MRV, are a factor determining curve morphology. The findings would be a basis of connection between 2-dimensional classification and transverse plane deformity.
Curves with different Lenke types demonstrated different levels of MRV and severity of rotation. The results suggest that different center levels of rotation, signified by MRV, are a factor determining curve morphology. The findings would be a basis of connection between 2-dimensional classification and transverse plane deformity.
The major difficulty in treating glioblastoma stems from the intrinsic privileged nature of the brain. This complicates therapy, as many traditionally potent chemotherapeutics cannot access their target sites in the brain. Several techniques have been investigated to overcome this barrier and facilitate drug delivery. Selleckchem Vadimezan However, these techniques have inherent shortcomings related to the delivery system, the drug itself, or its bioactivity. Periosteal flaps and temporoparietal fascial flaps (TPFFs) are widely used options because they have predictable vasculature and a wide rotational arc. These flaps are not restricted by the blood-brain barrier, as they derive their vascular supply from branches of the external carotid artery, which can be readily identified with Doppler ultrasound. We hypothesized that transposition of a vascularized TPFF to the walls of a resected tumor surgical cavity may bring autologous tissue not restricted by the blood-brain barrier in close vicinity of the resected tumor bed microenvironment. This offers a nonselective, long-lasting gateway to target the residual tumor cells nesting in the brain adjacent to the tumor.
A 47-year-old, right-handed woman with newly diagnosed multifocal glioblastoma underwent excision of the tumor and TPFF placement. This illustrative case report represents the first case of the use of this novel surgical technique with radiologic follow-up.
The blood-brain barrier is identified as a major barrier for effective drug delivery in glioblastoma. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the TPFF technique to bypass this barrier and help facilitate the goal of improving drug delivery.
The blood-brain barrier is identified as a major barrier for effective drug delivery in glioblastoma. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the TPFF technique to bypass this barrier and help facilitate the goal of improving drug delivery.
Minimally invasive surgery using tubular retractors was developed to minimize injury of surrounding brain during the removal of deep-seated lesions. No evidence supports the superiority of any available tubular retraction system in the treatment of these lesions. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes and complications after the resection of deep-seated lesions with tubular retractors and among available systems.
A PRISMA compliant systematic review was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify studies in which tubular retractors were used to resect deep-seated brain lesions in patients ≥18 years old.
The search strategy yielded 687 articles. Thirteen articles complying with inclusion criteria and quality assessment were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 309 patients operated on between 2008 and 2018 were evaluated. The most common lesions were gliomas (n= 127), followed by metastases (n= 101) and meningiomas (n= 19). Four different tubular retractors were used modified retractors (n= 121, 39.1%); METRx (n= 60, 19.4%); BrainPath (n= 92, 29.7%); and ViewSite Brain Access System (n= 36,11.7%). Estimated gross total resection rate was 75% (95% confidence interval, 69%-80%; I
= 9%), whereas the estimated complication rate was 9% (95% confidence interval 6%-14%; I
= 0%). None of the different brain retraction systems was found to be superior regarding extent of resection or complications on multiple comparisons (P > 0.05).
Tubular retractors represent a promising tool to achieve maximum safe resection of deep-seated brain lesions. However, there does not seem to be a statistically significant difference in extent of resection or complication rates among tubular retraction systems.
Tubular retractors represent a promising tool to achieve maximum safe resection of deep-seated brain lesions. However, there does not seem to be a statistically significant difference in extent of resection or complication rates among tubular retraction systems.
Congenital intranasal encephaloceles (ECs) are rare malformations of the pediatric age, complex to diagnose and treat, above all if associated with genetic syndromes or concomitant dysmorphisms. The aims of the study were to report our experience in managing nasal ECS in children, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the transnasal endoscopic repair, and to analyze in an overall way the surgical long-term outcomes. Moreover, we sought to contribute to the debate on pathogenesis of ECs, investigating possible related risk factors described in the literature.
A retrospective analysis was performed of pediatric nasal ECs managed with a transnasal endoscopic approach at a tertiary referral center through clinical follow-up and telephone survey.
Twenty-three patients with nasal ECs fitted the criteria of the study. Mean age at surgery was 5 years (69 months) and the mean follow-up was 59 months. The clinical presentation is described in detail, with particular emphasis on syndromic cases. Of 23 patients, 1.
The internal maxillary artery (IMAX) is currently considered one of the main donor vessels in extracranial-to-intracranial bypass surgeries. Four main techniques for harvesting the IMAX have been described via the anterior medial infratemporal fossa (AMITF), the middle infratemporal fossa (MITF), the anterior lateral middle fossa (ALMF), and the lateral middle fossa (LMF). The advantages and limitations of these techniques have not yet been systematically evaluated and compared.
Twenty-five cadaver specimens were used to evaluate the harvesting technique. The length and the caliber of the targeted IMAX segments, as well as the depth from the operating plane to the IMAX, surgical time, and surgical area of exposure, were analyzed.
The MITF technique provided the greatest operating area of exposure (mean, 3.88 ± 0.97 cm
). The LMF and MITF techniques provided the largest IMAX caliber (mean, 3.1 ± 0.4 mm and 3.0 ± 0.3 mm, respectively). The ALMF technique provided the shallowest operative depth as well as the least time of exposure (21.
Read More: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/DMXAA(ASA404).html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team