Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
61; p less then 0.01), and in TWA, median, and Min-Max subgroup showed moderate correlations (r = -0.57, r = -0.48, and r = -0.60; p less then 0.01). Contrastively, sNSE was not associated and correlated with PaCO2 in all analysis. Poor neurological outcome in LCO2 was significantly higher than HCO2 in qES, TWA, and median subgroups (p less then 0.01, p less then 0.01, and p = 0.02). Conclusion Association was found between NSE and PaCO2 using CSF, despite including normocapnic ranges; TWA of PaCO2 may be most strongly associated with CSF NSE levels. A prospective, multi-centre study is required to confirm our results.Aim To summarize the prognostic associations of pre- and intra-arrest factors with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival (in-hospital or 30 days) after traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods We conducted this review in accordance with the PRISMA and CHARMS guidelines. We searched Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception through December 1st, 2019. We included English language studies evaluating pre- and intra-arrest prognostic factors following penetrating or blunt traumatic OHCA. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool. We pooled unadjusted odds ratios using random-effects models and presented adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We used the GRADE method to describe certainty. Results We included 53 studies involving 37,528 patients. The most important predictors of survival were presence of cardiac motion on ultrasound (odds ratio 33.91, 1.87-613.42, low certainty) or a shockable initial cardiac rhythm (odds ratio 7.29, 5.09-10.44, moderate certainty), based on pooled unadjusted analyses. Importantly, mechanism of injury was not associated with either ROSC (odds ratio 0.97, 0.51-1.85, very low certainty) or survival (odds ratio 1.40, 0.79-2.48, very low certainty). Conclusion This review provides very low to moderate certainty evidence that pre- and intra-arrest prognostic factors following penetrating or blunt traumatic OHCA predict ROSC and survival. This evidence is primarily based on unadjusted data. Further well-designed studies with larger cohorts are warranted to test the adjusted prognostic ability of pre- and intra-arrest factors and guide therapeutic decision-making.Aim Assessment of brainstem function plays a key role in predicting the neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. However, the relationship of the two quantitative brainstem assessment methods-automated infrared pupillometry (AIP) and auditory brainstem response (ABR)-with neurological prognoses remains unclear. This study compares the prognostic value of AIP and ABR after cardiopulmonary arrest. Methods This retrospective observational study included 124 comatose patients after cardiopulmonary arrest. ABR and AIP measurements were performed simultaneously within 72 h after return of spontaneous circulation. Neurological outcome was assessed at discharge by estimating the cerebral performance category (CPC) score; favourable neurological outcome (CPC score, 1-2) or poor neurological outcome (CPC score, 3-5). The correlation of each AIP parameter and ABR I-V wave latency was tested using Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient, and the prognostic value was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). Results Pupillary light reflex (PLR) was not detected in 69 patients, and ABR wave V was not detected in 47 patients. All these patients had poor neurological outcome. Among those whose PLR and ABR could be measured, each AIP parameter had a tendency to be correlated with ABR I-V wave latency. Pupil constriction velocity provided the greatest AUC (0.819), with 81% sensitivity and 77% specificity. ABR I-V wave latency provided extremely low AUC (0.560). Conclusions Although AIP and ABR were correlated, the AIP measures were superior in predicting the neurological outcome after cardiac arrest as compared with the ABR measures.Introduction Trials may be neutral when they do not appropriately target the experimental intervention. We speculated multimodality assessment of early hypoxic-ischemic brain injury would identify phenotypes likely to benefit from therapeutic interventions. Methods We performed a retrospective study including comatose patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by one of 126 emergency medical services or in-hospital arrest at one of 26 hospitals from 2011 to 2019. All patients were ultimately transported to a single tertiary center for care including standardized initial neurological examination, brain imaging and electroencephalography; targeted temperature management (TTM); hemodynamic optimization targeting mean arterial pressure (MAP) >80 mmHg; and, coronary angiography for clinical suspicion for acute coronary syndrome. We used unsupervised learning to identify brain injury phenotypes defined by admission neurodiagnostics. We tested for interactions between phenotype and TTM, hemodynamic management and cardiac catheterization in models predicting recovery. Results We included 1086 patients with mean (SD) age 58 (17) years of whom 955 (88%) were resuscitated from OHCA. Survival to hospital discharge was 27%, and 248 (23%) were discharged with Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-3. selleck kinase inhibitor We identified 5 clusters defining distinct brain injury phenotypes, each comprising 14% to 30% of the cohort with discharge CPC 1-3 in 59% to less then 1%. We found significant interactions between cluster and TTM strategy (P = 0.01), MAP (P less then 0.001) and coronary angiography (P = 0.04) in models predicting outcomes. Conclusions We identified patterns of early hypoxic-ischemic injury based on multiple diagnostic modalities that predict responsiveness to several therapeutic interventions recently tested in neutral clinical trials.Background and aims Most patients with pancreatic cancer are diagnosed at a late stage and are not candidates for surgical resection. Many have jaundice requiring biliary drainage, which can be accomplished using ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). To date, there have been no studies evaluating the impact of ERCP or PTBD on survival among patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. The aims of our paper are (1) to compare overall survival between patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who receive ERCP to those receiving PTBD, (2) to compare overall survival between patients who received a biliary intervention (ERCP or PTBD) versus those who receive no biliary intervention, and (3) to compare secondary outcomes, such as length of hospital stay and costs, between ERCP and PTBD. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Patients with known pancreatic cancer were included if they had a pancreatic head mass and/or evidence of biliary obstruction.
Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/L-Adrenaline-Epinephrine.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team