Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for advanced gastric cancer (GC) has recently been revealed. The use of tumor regression grade (TRG) has also been reported, where TRG has been positively correlated with prognosis. However, previous studies included several types of GC and treatments. The prognostic value of TRG in a specific population has not been well investigated. Therefore, a meta-analysis of studies on gastric adenocarcinomas treated with NAC that evaluate the prognostic impact of TRG on overall survival (OS) must be conducted to provide more accurate evidence.
A meta-analysis of studies reporting gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction (GC/GEJ) adenocarcinoma treated with NAC was performed. Studies that calculate the number of responders and non-responders were considered eligible. The risk ratio (RR) was obtained from the eligible studies, and a random-effects model was used for pooled analysis.
Fourteen studies, which included a total of 1660 patients, were included in the current study. The responders showed better OS (RR 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.60, P<0.001). All subgroup analyses (Asian vs. non-Asian populations, different TRGs, GC/GEJ vs. GC) also revealed the statistical dominance of better TRG over better OS. However, the possibility of some publication bias remained.
In this meta-analysis, better TRG was associated with better OS. However, the histology, configuration, and location of GC varied. selleck products Hence, a more subdivided analysis is recommended to obtain more solid evidence.
In this meta-analysis, better TRG was associated with better OS. However, the histology, configuration, and location of GC varied. Hence, a more subdivided analysis is recommended to obtain more solid evidence.
Surgery for small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms (SB-NEN) might result in vascular compromise of the remaining bowel due to resection of lymph node metastases in close proximity to main mesenteric vessels. Fluorescence angiography (FA) has been described as a safe technique to assess perfusion during gastro-intestinal surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the potential value of intraoperative FA during surgery for SB-NEN.
This study included patients undergoing surgery for SB-NEN of any stage. The planned level of transection was marked by the surgeon, after which FA using indocyanine green (ICG) was performed. The primary study outcome was change in management due to FA.
Ten consecutive patients with SB-NEN were included, all with metastatic lymph nodes close to main mesenteric vessels. FA use led to management changes in eight patients (80%); four patients had less bowel resected with a preserved length of 5-35cm. The other four patients had more extended bowel resections with an additional length varying from 3 to 25cm. The median postoperative stay was 4 days (interquartile range 4-6). No anastomotic leakage occurred.
This is the first known series describing preliminary results of FA during SB-NEN surgery. FA led to a management change in 80% of patients with better tailoring the extent of resection of small bowel. Structural implementation of FA to assess small bowel perfusion after dissection for small bowel NET results in change of management, either by preserving small bowel or resecting ill-perfused small bowel.
This is the first known series describing preliminary results of FA during SB-NEN surgery. FA led to a management change in 80% of patients with better tailoring the extent of resection of small bowel. Structural implementation of FA to assess small bowel perfusion after dissection for small bowel NET results in change of management, either by preserving small bowel or resecting ill-perfused small bowel.
Stage IIB/IIC (8th AJCC) melanoma patients are known to have high-risk primary tumors, however they follow the same routine to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as more low risk tumors. Guidelines are not conclusive regarding the use of preoperative imaging for these patients. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the value of ultrasound (US) and
F-FDG PET/CT prior to lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) and SLNB for stage IIB/C melanoma patients.
From 2019-04 till 2020-01, all stage IIB/C melanoma patients underwent US of the regional lymph nodes and whole body
F-FDG PET/CT before their planned LSG and SLNB. Suspected metastases were confirmed with fine needle aspiration (FNA), prior to surgery.
In total 23 patients were screened six had metastases detected by imaging, two by US, one by
F-FDG PET/CT and three were detected by both imaging modalities. All metastases were nodal and therefore treatment was altered to lymph node dissection and all but one also received adjuvant therapy. Eight (47%) of the 17 patients without macroscopic disease, still had a positive SN. Sensitivity, specificity and false negative rate for US and
F-FDG PET/CT were 36%, 89%, 64% and 29%, 100% and 71%, respectively.
Preoperative negative imaging does not exclude the presence of SN metastases, therefore SLNB cannot be foregone. However, US detected metastases in 22% of patients, altering their treatment, which suggests it is effective in the work-up of stage IIB/C melanoma. Staging with
F-FDG PET/CT is not of added value prior to LSG and SLNB and should therefore not be used.
Preoperative negative imaging does not exclude the presence of SN metastases, therefore SLNB cannot be foregone. However, US detected metastases in 22% of patients, altering their treatment, which suggests it is effective in the work-up of stage IIB/C melanoma. Staging with 18F-FDG PET/CT is not of added value prior to LSG and SLNB and should therefore not be used.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the evidence on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQL) in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS).
A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42020175288). An electronic search was carried out in March 2020 and included clinical trials, cross-sectional studies, and case-control studies. The following databases were screened Embase, LILACS, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. A gray literature search was performed on Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. The eligibility criteria comprised publications that assessed HRQL or OHRQL in patients with BMS. The risk of bias was evaluated through The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used for the assessment of evidence quality.
Thirty-three studies were included, and most presented a low risk of bias.
My Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/chir-99021-ct99021-hcl.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team