Notes
Notes - notes.io |
To provide preliminary reference data for singleton consonant development in children with typical development (TD) versus protracted phonological development (PPD) for Manitoba Canadian French, a language with an uncommon stress pattern ("iambic" or "right-headed"). Following a nonlinear perspective, singleton consonants were examined both as segments and in terms of the structure of words. Higher match levels for consonants were expected in shorter versus longer words and in stressed versus unstressed syllables. A larger effect was expected in children with PPD than those with TD.
Participants included 20 TD children and 12 with PPD aged 2 to 4 years from Manitoba, Canada. Single words were digitally recorded by trained speech-language pathologists, transcribed by native French speakers and analysed with Phon 3.0.
Friedman and Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests revealed that children with PPD had significantly more mismatches than TD children, especially in contexts of unstressed syllables in multisyllabic words. The most common mismatch ("error") patterns were consonant substitution, consonant deletion and syllable deletion.
Word length and stress were found to influence consonant development within French, similar to findings in languages with left-headed or trochaic stress. Selleckchem Heparin Clinically, the findings underscore the relevance of considering the child's entire phonological system for identification of strengths and needs in assessment and intervention.
Word length and stress were found to influence consonant development within French, similar to findings in languages with left-headed or trochaic stress. Clinically, the findings underscore the relevance of considering the child's entire phonological system for identification of strengths and needs in assessment and intervention.
Previous work suggests that variability across repeated productions of the same word may be useful in diagnosing speech sound disorder (SSD) in bilingual children. However, there is debate over what level of variability in transcribed productions should be considered typical even in monolingual speech development. High variability in the input represents a factor that could promote increased production variability in bilinguals. For this reason, the current study examines transcription-based token-to-token variability in bilingual children speaking Jamaican Creole (JC) and English.
Twenty-five bilingual children aged 3;4-5;1 and twenty-five monolingual children aged 2;9-4;1 from a previous study were recorded producing eleven items in three repetitions.
Contrary to our hypothesis, bilingual children showed similar rates of token-to-token variability compared to the monolingual children. In a separate analysis of bilingual data across languages, bilingual children were more variable in JC compared to English productions.
The difference between language contexts suggests that creole languages, which exist on a usage continuum, may be associated with increased variability in production. Our findings suggest that token-to-token production variability may be of similar clinical utility for bilingual and monolingual populations.
The difference between language contexts suggests that creole languages, which exist on a usage continuum, may be associated with increased variability in production. Our findings suggest that token-to-token production variability may be of similar clinical utility for bilingual and monolingual populations.
Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is difficult to diagnose because there is little agreement on objective clinical markers. Since studies of phonological development in French-speaking children are scarce, there are even fewer recognised markers in French as compared to English. This study aims to determine if a set of operationalised, quantitative measures derived from clinical markers of CAS in English corroborate with clinical CAS diagnosis in French-speaking children. This research contributes to improving differential diagnosis of CAS and phonological disorder cross-linguistically.
We collected data from five children diagnosed with CAS, nine children diagnosed with phonological disorder, and 75 typically-developing children aged 5.10-9.2 years old. All children were assessed on three speech production tasks picture-naming, non-word repetition, and diadochokinesis. We extracted 20 quantitative measures corresponding to commonly accepted clinical features of CAS.
Similar to English-speaking children, French-speaking children with CAS exhibited a high number of vowel errors, consonant and cluster errors, consonant epentheses, devoicing errors, slow diadochokinesis rate, more inconsistency and increased errors with longer words. Contrary to studies on English, these children with CAS did not produce intrusive schwas or vowels.
This multiple-case study highlights the need for cross-linguistic diagnostic criteria for CAS.
This multiple-case study highlights the need for cross-linguistic diagnostic criteria for CAS.
In the Netherlands, children (2;0-5;0) with (presumed) severe DLD attend special treatment groups. In these groups, speech sound disorders (SSDs) are usually treated in individual therapy. The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy of an added phonological group intervention.
Parallel to individual therapy, these children received a group intervention from trained childcare professionals. A within-subject multiple-baseline design was chosen to compare children's development before and after the intervention. Children tested at all six time points were included in the intervention study (
= 31, age range 28-46 months).
Of the children attending the selected groups, 77% have an SSD. The participating children demonstrate with a severe SSD based on their caregivers' report of their intelligibility at baseline. Their phonological production skills increased from a mean Percentage Consonants Correct (PCC) of 42-57% after the intervention compared to no significant increase during the measurements before the intervention.
We conclude that childcare professionals without a specific background in speech-language pathology can effectively be trained to deliver a phonological group intervention to children with (presumed) severe DLD and SSD. Moreover, these children make a clinically relevant increase in their phonological production skills due to the phonological group intervention.
We conclude that childcare professionals without a specific background in speech-language pathology can effectively be trained to deliver a phonological group intervention to children with (presumed) severe DLD and SSD. Moreover, these children make a clinically relevant increase in their phonological production skills due to the phonological group intervention.
Here's my website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/heparin.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team
