Notes
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
Hepatic steatosis has become a considerable concern in the pediatric population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using ultrasound Nakagami imaging to produce a parametric image for analyzing the echo amplitude distribution to assess pediatric hepatic steatosis.
A total of 68 pediatric participants were enrolled in healthy control (n = 26) and study groups (n = 42). Raw data from ultrasound imaging were acquired for each participant analysis using AmCAD-US, a software approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for ultrasound Nakagami imaging. The Nakagami parameters were compared with the hepatic steatosis index (HSI) and the steatosis grade (G0 HSI < 30; G1 30 ≤ HSI < 36; G2 36 ≤ HSI < 41.6; G3 41.6 ≤ HSI < 43; G4 HSI ≥ 43) using correlation analysis, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
The Nakagami parameter increased from 0.53 ± 0.13 to 0.82 ± 0.05 with increasing severity of hepatic steatosisediatric hepatic steatosis. • The Nakagami parameter demonstrated promising diagnostic performance in evaluating pediatric hepatic steatosis.
To evaluate the degree of variability in computer-assisted interpretation of low-dose chest CTs (LDCTs) among radiologists in a nationwide lung cancer screening (LCS) program, through comparison with a retrospective interpretation from a central laboratory.
Consecutive baseline LDCTs (n = 3353) from a nationwide LCS program were investigated. In the institutional reading, 20 radiologists in 14 institutions interpreted LDCTs using computer-aided detection and semi-automated segmentation systems for lung nodules. In the retrospective central review, a single radiologist re-interpreted all LDCTs using the same system, recording any non-calcified nodules ≥ 3mm without arbitrary rejection of semi-automated segmentation to minimize the intervention of radiologist's discretion. Positive results (requiring additional follow-up LDCTs or diagnostic procedures) were initially classified by the lung CT screening reporting and data system (Lung-RADS) during the interpretation, while the classifications based on the voaboratory resulted in reduced variability but an increased positive rate.
• Considerable variability existed in the interpretation of screening LDCT among radiologists partly from the different usage of the computerized system. • A retrospective reading of low-dose chest CTs in the central laboratory resulted in reduced variability but an increased positive rate.
We aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT-determined resectability following neoadjuvant treatment for predicting margin-negative resection (R0 resection) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Original studies with sufficient details to obtain the sensitivity and specificity of CT-determined resectability following neoadjuvant treatment, with a reference on the pathological margin status, were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases until February 24, 2020. The identified studies were divided into two groups based on the criteria of R0 resectable tumor (ordinary criterion resectable PDAC alone; extended criterion resectable and borderline resectable PDAC). The meta-analytic summary of the sensitivity and specificity for each criterion was estimated separately using a bivariate random-effect model. Summary results of the two criteria were compared using a joint-model bivariate meta-regression.
Of 739 studies initially searched, 6 studies (6 with or but lower specificity than with the ordinary criterion. • CT-determined resectability with both criteria achieved suboptimal diagnostic performances, suggesting that care should be taken while selecting surgical candidates and when determining the surgical extent after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with PDAC.
• CT-determined resectability of PDAC after neoadjuvant treatment using the ordinary criterion shows low sensitivity and high specificity in predicting R0 resection. • With the extended criterion, CT-determined resectability shows higher sensitivity but lower specificity than with the ordinary criterion. • CT-determined resectability with both criteria achieved suboptimal diagnostic performances, suggesting that care should be taken while selecting surgical candidates and when determining the surgical extent after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with PDAC.
Assessment of lung development and maturity is of utmost importance in prenatal counseling. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) effect MRI was developed for functional evaluations of organs. To date, no data are available in fetal lungs and nothing is known about the existence of a BOLD effect in the lungs. The aim of our study was to evaluate if a BOLD response could be detected in fetal lungs.
From January 2014 to December 2016, 38 healthy pregnant women were prospectively enrolled. After a routine scan on a 1.5-T MRI device (normoxic period), maternal hyperoxia was induced for 5 min before the BOLD sequence (hyperoxic period). R2* was evaluated by fitting average intensity of the signal, both for normoxic (norm) and hyperoxic (hyper) periods.
A significant BOLD response was observed after maternal hyperoxia in the lungs with a mean R2* decrease of 12.1 ± 2.5% (p < 0.001), in line with the placenta response with a mean R2* decrease of 19.2 ± 5.9% (p < 0.0001), confirming appropriate oxygen uptakications for the fetal organs. selleck kinase inhibitor • Assessment of lung development is of utmost importance in prenatal counseling, but to date no data are available in fetal lungs. • BOLD response can be observed in the normal fetal lung opening the way to studies on fetus with pathological lungs.
Preoperative differentiation between benign lymphoepithelial lesion (BLEL) and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALToma) in the parotid gland is important for treatment decisions. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a CT-based radiomics nomogram combining radiomics signature and clinical factors for the preoperative differentiation of BLEL from MALToma in the parotid gland.
A total of 101 patients with BLEL (n = 46) or MALToma (n = 55) were divided into a training set (n = 70) and validation set (n = 31). Radiomics features were extracted from non-contrast CT images, a radiomics signature was constructed, and a radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated. Demographics and CT findings were assessed to build a clinical factor model. A radiomics nomogram combining the Rad-score and independent clinical factors was constructed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The performance levels of the nomogram, radiomics signature, and clinical model were evaluated and validated on the training and validation datasets, and then compared among the three models.
Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/sulfosuccinimidyl-oleate-sodium.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team