Notes
Notes - notes.io |
Estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) is a well-validated prognostic indicator in heart failure. However, it remains unclear whether ePVS has prognostic significance in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Moreover, there is no available information on its additive effect with the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score in AMI patients.
Data were obtained from the Osaka Acute Coronary Insufficiency Study (OACIS) registry database. Patients whose data were available for ePVS derived from Hakim's formula and the GRACE risk score were studied. The primary endpoints were in-hospital and 5-year mortality.
Of 3930 patients, 206 and 200 patients died during hospitalization and 5years after discharge, respectively. After adjustment, ePVS remained an independent predictor of in-hospital death (OR1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p=0.036), and 5-year mortality(HR1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, p<0.001). An additive effect of ePVS with the GRACE risk score was observed in predicting the 5-year mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) from 0.744 to 0.763 (p=0.026), but not in-hospital mortality (the AUC changed from 0.875 to 0.875, p=0.529). The incremental predictive value of combining ePVS and the GRACE risk score for 5-year mortality was significantly improved, as shown by the net reclassification improvement (NRI0.378, p<0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI0.014, p<0.001).
In patients with AMI, ePVS independently predicted in-hospital and long-term mortality. In addition, ePVS had an additive effect with the GRACE risk score on long-term mortality. Therefore, ePVS may be useful for identifying high-risk subjects for intensive treatment.
In patients with AMI, ePVS independently predicted in-hospital and long-term mortality. In addition, ePVS had an additive effect with the GRACE risk score on long-term mortality. Therefore, ePVS may be useful for identifying high-risk subjects for intensive treatment.
Asians have a much lower incidence of adverse coronary events than Caucasians. We sought to evaluate the characteristics of coronary lipid-rich plaques (LRP) in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stable angina (SA). We also aimed to identify surrogate markers for the extent of LRP.
We evaluated 207 patients (ACS, n=75; SA, n=132) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention under near infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS). Tetrahydropiperine in vivo Plaque characteristics and the extent of LRP [defined as a long segment with a 4-mm maximum lipid-core burden index (maxLCBI
)] on NIRS in de-novo culprit and non-culprit segments were analyzed.
The ACS culprit lesions had a significantly higher maxLCBI
(median [interquartile range (IQR)] 533 [385-745] vs. 361 [174-527],
<0.001) than the SA culprit lesions. On multivariate logistic analysis, a large LRP (defined as maxLCBI
≥400) was the strongest independent predictor of the ACS culprit segment (odds ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.95-8.02). In non-culprit segments, 19.8% of patients had at least one large LRP without a small lumen. No significant correlation was found between the extent of LRP and systematic biomarkers (hs-CRP, IL-6, TNF-α), whereas the extent of LRP was positively correlated with IVUS plaque burden (r=0.24,
<0.001).
We confirmed that NIRS-IVUS plaque assessment could be useful to differentiate ACS from SA culprit lesions, and that a threshold maxLCBI
≥400 was clinically suitable in Japanese patients. No surrogate maker for a high-risk LRP was found; consequently, direct intravascular evaluation of plaque characteristics remains important.
We confirmed that NIRS-IVUS plaque assessment could be useful to differentiate ACS from SA culprit lesions, and that a threshold maxLCBI4mm ≥ 400 was clinically suitable in Japanese patients. No surrogate maker for a high-risk LRP was found; consequently, direct intravascular evaluation of plaque characteristics remains important.
Revision to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in patients with existing pacemakers with worsening heart failure (HF) can improve symptoms and cardiac function. We identify factors that predict improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) within a year of CRT revision.
We performed a retrospective study of 146 consecutive patients (16% female, mean age 73±11years, mean LVEF 27±8%) undergoing revision to CRT (January 2012 to May 2018) in a single tertiary centre. LVEF was measured pre-revision and 3, 6 and 12months post-upgrade.
At 6months, 68% of patients demonstrated improvement in LVEF (mean ΔLVEF+6.7%±9.6). Compared to patients in atrial fibrillation (AF), patients with sinus rhythm had a greater improvement in LVEF at 6months (sinus 8.4±10.3% vs. AF 4.2±8.0%, p=0.02). Compared to ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) had a greater improvement in LVEF at 6months (NICM 8.4±9.8% vs ICM 4.8±9.2%, p=0.05). Patients with RV pacing ≥40% at baseline had a greater improvement in LVEF at 6months (≥40% RV pacing 9.3±10.2 vs.<40% RV pacing 4.0±7.4%, p=0.01). All improvements were sustained over 12months post-revision. There was no significant difference between genders, years between initial implant and revision, or previous device type.
Our real-world experience supports current guidelines on CRT revision. NICM, ≥40% RV pacing and sinus rhythm are the main predictors of improvement in LVEF in patients who underwent CRT revision.
Our real-world experience supports current guidelines on CRT revision. NICM, ≥40% RV pacing and sinus rhythm are the main predictors of improvement in LVEF in patients who underwent CRT revision.
The SINGER pilot randomized controlled trial aims to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study (FINGER) multi-domain lifestyle interventions compared to Singaporean adaptations.
Seventy elderly participants were recruited and randomized into FINGER (n = 36) or SINGER (n = 34) interventions; involving physical exercise, cognitive training, diet, and vascular risk factors management, for 6 months.
Both intervention groups were equally feasible and acceptable with participants completing at least 80% of the interventions. Body strength improved in both groups (
= .04,
= .06,
= .05). More participants in the SINGER group attained good blood pressure control at month-6 compared to FINGER (41% vs 19%;
= .06).
This study is the first to compare the feasibility of multi-domain interventions adapted to local culture with the FINGER interventions. The findings will be utilized for a larger study to provide evidence for the efficacy of multi-domain lifestyle interventions in preventing cognitive decline.
Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/tetrahydropiperine.html
|
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team