Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
Conclusions We propose this route of blood injection therapy as a novel method for the treatment of CSF leak after lumbar surgery. Copyright © 2020 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.Introduction To analyze the extent to which various types of orthoses can restrict motion of the lumbar spine and provide basic evidence regarding the optimal orthosis for conservative treatment of lumbar spondylolysis (LS), particularly. Although several orthoses have been developed and applied for LS with better outcomes for bony healing, basic data regarding which is optimal are still lacking. Methods Ten healthy voluntary participants were included in this study. Lumbar spine range of motion (ROM) was analyzed using a three-dimensional motion capture system (NEXUS 2.2, Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., UK) under five conditions wearing no orthosis (NB) and four types of lumbar-sacral orthoses (LSO) custom-made hard LSO (HO), soft LSO supported by four aluminum stays and a custom-molded back cast-panel named "Return to Sports" braces (RS), custom-made soft LSO known as Damen type elasticity corset (DC), and off-the-shelf soft LSO. see more Results HO showed the highest restriction of motion in all directions than the others. Especially, ROM of rotation and side bending were reduced to 58.3% and 63.6% compared with NB, respectively. The other three LSOs showed significantly higher restriction in extension, rotation, and side bending than NB. In flexion and side bending, DC showed significantly higher restriction than NB. Conclusions HO showed high restriction in all directions. RS showed higher restriction in extension than NB and less restriction in flexion and side bending than other custom-made LSOs. DC was the only soft LSO showing higher restriction than NB in flexion. Copyright © 2020 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.Introduction Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is becoming a more common surgical treatment option for adult degenerative lumbar conditions. LLIF is a mini-open access technique with wound retractors, and postoperative hematoma due to segmental vessels injury is reported. Thus, it is considered that there is a need to conduct detailed preoperative examinations to identify where the lumbar vessels are. As far as we know, there are only a few studies investigating the location of the lumbar arteries. This study evaluates the anatomical position of lumbar arteries using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods We studied 101 MRIs of patients with lumbar disease. The length from the upper and lower end plates of the vertebra to the lumbar arteries was measured. The measurement was conducted with coronal MRI images of every quarter slice of L1 to L4 vertebrae. We also investigated sagittal MRI images to determine whether the lumbar vessels are located on intervertebral disc in each level from L1/2 to L5/S1. Results The lumbar vessels are not always located at the center of the vertebrae. Some lumbar vessels are located within 8 mm from the end plates. Especially in L4, the lumbar vessels tended to go down from the anterior cranial side to the posterior caudal side (P less then 0.01). 8, 24, and 54 lumbar vessels are located at the anterior quarter, the center, and the posterior quarter slice of the vertebrae, respectively, in L4. There were seven lumbar vessels in total located on the vertebral disc level. Conclusions It is necessary to investigate where the lumbar arteries are located to prevent its injury in LLIF, because the lumbar artery is not always located at the center of a vertebra. MRIs may provide a valuable information to avoid vascular injury during LLIF. Copyright © 2020 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.Introduction Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is known to demonstrate a very poor prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors in LM cases diagnosed by spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 19 patients with LM detected by spinal MRI between 2010 and 2017. Results The primary tumors were breast carcinoma (n = 7), lung carcinoma (n = 6), lymphoma (n = 3), colorectal carcinoma (n = 2), and gastric carcinoma (n = 1). Thirteen patients exhibited preceding brain metastasis, and 11 of these exhibited metastasis in the posterior fossa. Ten patients exhibited limb paralysis. Performance status at diagnosis was 0-1 in 6 patients, 2 in 9 patients, and 3-4 in 4 patients. Testing of cerebrospinal fluid revealed malignant cells in 9 patients. On MRI, 11 patients demonstrated disseminated tumor lesions at the cervical cord level, 15 patients at the thoracic cord level, and 11 patients below the conus level. Eleven patients received radiation therapy, while intrathecal chemotherapy was performed in 9 patients. Univariate analysis revealed cervical cord level lesions, intrathecal chemotherapy, paralysis, and performance status as prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis identified existence of a cervical cord lesion as associated with a poor prognosis (hazards ratio (HR) 3.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-12.2), while administration of intrathecal chemotherapy was associated with a good prognosis (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.026-0.67). Conclusions In LM patients, cervical cord level lesions are a negative factor for prognosis, and performance of intrathecal chemotherapy is a positive factor for prognosis. Copyright © 2020 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.Introduction Surgical treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) often involves older patients with various comorbidities; thus, attending physicians must pay special attention to the invasiveness of surgical procedures and possible perioperative complications. In this retrospective observational study, we investigated the relationship between OVF and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) by examining the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes. Methods Subjects comprised 26 patients (14 men, 12 women) who underwent surgical treatment for OVF complicated by DISH. Vertebral injuries affected the thoracolumbar transitional vertebrae in 18 patients and the middle and lower lumbar vertebrae in eight patients. The clinical characteristics, surgical results, radiological assessments, and outcomes were evaluated on the basis of the levels of affected vertebrae and whether anterior column reconstruction (ACR) was performed. Results Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measurements improved from an average of 69.
Read More: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/pu-h71.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team