Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
Objective To evaluate the results of laparoscopic treatment of patients with advanced appendicular peritonitis. Material and methods There were 271 patients with acute appendicitis complicated by peritonitis. The main group consisted of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy after diagnostic laparoscopy (n=231), the control group - diagnostic laparoscopy followed by conversion to median laparotomy (n=36). Four extremely ill patients were operated through laparotomy and excluded from the further analysis. Results Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 267 patients with advanced appendicular peritonitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy, debridement and abdominal drainage were performed in 231 (85.2%) patients. Mean age of patients was 44±18.5 years, duration of disease - 36.2±20.3 hours. Diffuse peritonitis was diagnosed in 219 (82%) patients, advanced peritonitis - in 48 (16.5%) cases. Incidence of conversion was 13.5%. Mortality was absent in both groups. Postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the conversion group (72.2% vs. 29.4%, p less then 0.0001). Conclusion Laparoscopic interventions for common appendicular peritonitis are feasible, effective and reduce postoperative morbidity.Objective To compare different clinical and morphometric features of patients undergoing TPAIT for prediction of postoperative outcomes. Material and methods A retrospective review enrolled patients who underwent TPAIT for the period from January 2007 to October 2017. Morphometric parameters were analyzed using preoperative CT scans and patients were grouped to examine association of these characteristics with postoperative morbidity. Sarcopenia was defined as the presence of a TPA in the lowest sex-specific quartile. The impact of sarcopenia on pancreatic islet features, perioperative blood transfusion, ICU- and hospital-stay, complications, repeated admission within 90 days and islet function was assessed. Results A total of 34 patients were included in this study (12 males and 24 females). At the time of diagnosis, mean age of patients was 43.1 years. Mean body mass index (BMI) in sarcopenic patients was 24.9 kg/m2, mean BMI in those without sarcopenia - 24.8 kg/m2 (p=1.00). Various surgical complications were observed in 11 patients (32.3%). VX-561 CFTR modulator Patients with sarcopenia experienced more complications (83.3%) compared with patients without sarcopenia (50%). However, differences were not significant (p=0.31). Islet characteristics (islet numbers, purity), readmission, ICU- and hospital-stay, incidence of blood transfusion and islet function were also similar in both groups. Conclusion Sarcopenia is not a predictor of postoperative complications and islet cell function in chronic pancreatitis patients following TPAIT.Objective To evaluate the long-term outcomes of surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma depending tumor dimensions, vascular invasion, lymph node metastases, cellular differentiation and quality of resection. Material and methods There were 46 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocellular cancer. Extended hemihepatectomy was made in 14 patients (30.4%), resection of two and three liver segments - in 17 cases (36.9%), standard hemihepatectomy - in 15 patients (32.6%). Liver resection was combined with extrahepatic bile duct resection in 5 (10.9%) patients. Liver resection was followed by biopsy of specimens. Dimension and number of tumors, differentiation grade, resection margin, liver capsule invasion, vascular invasion and regional lymph node metastases were analyzed. Forty-four (95.6%) patients were followed-up in long-term postoperative period. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 13.2 (Dell Inc., USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics v.25 (IBM Corp., USA) software package. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics v.25 software. Results Median survival was 37 months, 1-year - 75.9% (60.9-90.9%), 3-year - 57.6% (35.5-79.6%), 5-year - 36% (8.2-63.7%). Median survival after R1 resection was 37 months, R2 resection - 12 months. Median survival was not achieved in R0 group. We found significant differences in overall survival depending on quality of resection. Tumor dimension over 5 cm, low-grade adenocarcinoma, microvascular invasion and lymph node metastases were associated with impaired postoperative survival. However, differences were not significant. Conclusion The main surgical strategy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma should be ensuring microscopically negative resection margin.Vulvar cancer is rarely seen. Vulva corresponds to the external female genitalia and it is in association with the perineum with the intersection of urinary, sexual and anal systems. The deep anatomy of the perineum in the urogenital and anogenital triangle should be well-known by the gynecological oncologists. Radical vulvectomy is the choice of surgical treatment in gross tumors expanding on the vulvar skin. After this type of excision, the reconstruction is critically important because it is not always feasible to suture the vulvar defect in a primary manner. Thus, the reconstruction options should also be known by the gynecological oncologists. Here we demonstrate the video of radical vulvar cancer surgery which was performed on a cadaver with gluteal and medial thigh V-Y advancement flap reconstruction.The purpose of this video is to demonstrate the use of a microsurgical temporary vascular clip system to facilitate laparoscopic enucleation of uterine fibroids. Throughout the course of the last three decades, the laparoscopic route has been established as the therapy of choice in the surgical treatment of uterine fibroids. Laparoscopic fibroid enucleation is characterized by a low morbidity rate and high patient satisfaction levels. Especially when facing a large fibroid or multiple fibroids, the well-vascularized myometrium can constitute a technical challenge in endoscopic fibroid enucleation Diffuse bleeding may lead to significant intraoperative hemorrhage and extensive use of bipolar or monopolar diathermy in order to achieve hemostasis might lead to post-operative uterine wall necrosis with a potential risk of uterine rupture during following pregnancies. To address this clinical challenge, we developed a technique with temporary interruption of uterine blood supply by applying a microsurgical vascular clip (Yasargil vascular clip system, Aesculap, Tuttlingen Germany) to the uterine artery and the utero-ovarian vessel arcade to minimize bleeding during endoscopic fibroid enucleation.
My Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/vx-561.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team