Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
7% (95% CI 39.7%, 69.0%) for CBOP/BEP and 38.7% (95% CI 24.7%, 52.4%) for BEP (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59 (0.33, 1.06), p = 0.079). Three-year OS is 65.0% (48.8%, 77.2%) and 58.5% (43.0%, 71.2%), respectively (HR 0.79 (0.41, 1.52), p = 0.49). Twelve-month toxicity was affected by subsequent treatments, with no clear differences between arms. Stabilising chemotherapy was associated with poorer PFS (HR 2.09 (1.14, 3.81), p = 0.017), whereas unfavourable marker decline, in 60 (70%) patients, was not. CONCLUSION Although not powered for PFS, results for CBOP/BEP are promising. Impact on OS was less clear (and will be affected by subsequent therapy). Further study in an international phase III trial is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN 53643604. BACKGROUND The study of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), namely the fraction derived from tumors (ctDNA), is a clinically relevant noninvasive biomarker for cancer management. However, the intrinsic low abundance of ctDNA in plasma limits its implementation in the clinic. AIM OF THE STUDY In this study, the objective was to demonstrate that induction of apoptosis-the major source of ctDNA-increases ctDNA concentration, thereby increasing the sensitivity to detect clinically relevant mutations in plasma. METHODS In vitro models were used to test the effect of docetaxel on the release levels of DNA from lung cancer cells. In vivo, Rag2-/-IL2rg-/- immunodeficient C57BL/6 xenografted mice were treated with docetaxel for 24 h or 48 h. Tumor tissue and blood were collected to evaluate the levels of apoptosis DNA release levels, respectively. RESULTS We observed increased levels of apoptosis in H1975 cells and a consequent increase in cfDNA released into the culture medium after docetaxel treatment. In vivo, the results show increased cfDNA concentration in plasma of xenografted mice after apoptosis stimulation. Importantly, treatment increased the sensitivity of detection of relevant cancer mutations, namely 24 h after treatment. CONCLUSION This study provides new insights regarding the importance of timing for blood collection. In our experimental model, we demonstrate that blood collection should be performed 24 h after treatment (apoptosis induction), for optimal ctDNA analysis. Translating these results into the clinical setting is likely to increase sensitivity to detect tumor-derived mutations in plasma, might help guide the therapeutic decision, and optimize current liquid biopsy procedures for situations where tissue analysis is not possible. INTRODUCTION We report the clinical findings and results of treatment in the cohort of patients with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) managed according to the European pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) protocol from 2005 to 2016. METHODS Patients ( less then 25 years old) with IMT from 9 countries were prospectively registered via a web-based system. Their histology was reviewed by a national/international pathology panel. Immunohistochemistry for ALK assessment was mandatory. No adjuvant therapy was suggested for initially resected tumors. No specific systemic therapy was recommended for cases of unresectable disease. RESULTS Among 80 cases of IMT registered, 20 were excluded because pathology review led to a revised diagnosis. Of the remaining 60 patients (median age 9.5 years), 59 had localized, and 1 had multifocal/metastatic disease. The lung was the primary site in 14 cases. IMT developed as a second tumor in 2 cases. selleck kinase inhibitor Forty cases were ALK-positive, and 20 were ALK-negative. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 82.9% and 98.1%, respectively. No clinical variables correlated statistically with the outcome survival was the same for ALK-positive and ALK-negative cases. The overall response to systemic therapy was 64% 8/10 cases responded to vinblastine-methotrexate chemotherapy, and 5/5 to ALK-inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated a good overall prognosis for IMT, even for initially unresectable disease and in ALK-negative cases. Chemotherapy is still a valid option for advanced disease. Larger studies involving both pediatric and adult patients are needed to clarify the role of ALK inhibitors. Cancers of unknown primary (CUP) are among the most common causes of death due to cancer, are associated with a poor prognosis and have few therapeutic options available. Molecularly-guided site-specific treatments were explored based on the assumption that CUP are similar in their response to treatment of predicted primary tumours. Given the discordant results between these studies, a meta-analysis using a random-effects model and the inverse variance method was performed. MEDLINE and conference abstracts of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) meetings were searched from inception until November 2019. A trend towards improved OS was noted with site-specific versus empiric treatment for CUP (HR = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.02). There was significant heterogeneity across the four studies (I [2] = 79%; p = 0.002) but no significant difference was noted between the treatment effect in the two subgroups (randomised vs. non-randomised; p = 0.07). The test for overall effect for progression free survival, which had only been reported for the two randomised studies, was not statistically significant (HR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.74-1.17), with little heterogeneity between studies (I [2] = 0%; p = 0.77). The results of this meta-analysis highlight the significant heterogeneity between the prospective studies comparing molecularly tailored to empiric therapy for CUP and the need for other randomised studies including only primary tumors with available effective therapies. Recently, immunotherapy has evolved into a true treatment modality with the approval of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors as the standard care for first-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Until now, for patients with advanced NSCLC, treatment of targeting immune checkpoints reveals a promising survival benefit, and some patients even get long term survive, which creates a paradigm shift in NSCLC treatment. However, many issues or problems are also appearing in clinical practice, such as the lower overall efficacy rate (20-40%), treatment modes, populations choice of immunotherapy, drug resistance, and safety, etc. Thus, in this review, we will mainly summarize and discuss the recent development and confusion of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC patients based on current clinical studies.
My Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/emd638683.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team