Notes
Notes - notes.io |
IPS predicted surgeons who make critical errors and need remediation interventions. No metrics showed Kirkpatrick's Level 4 evidence of technical skills training benefit to emergency surgery outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Expert benchmarks, errors, complication rates, task completion time, task-specific checklists, global rating scales, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills, and IPS were found to identify surgeons, at all levels of seniority, who are in need of remediation of technical skills for open surgical hemorrhage control. Large-scale, multicenter studies are needed to evaluate any benefit of trauma technical skills training on patient outcomes. BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are being used increasingly in microvascular breast reconstruction. However, it is unclear as to what extent the benefits outweigh the costs. CP21 molecular weight We hypothesized that an ERAS pathway for microvascular breast reconstruction would be cost-effective relative to the standard of care. STUDY DESIGN A decision-analytic model was made incorporating clinically relevant health states after microvascular breast reconstruction with ERAS vs standard of care. Probabilities and utility scores were abstracted from published sources, and a third-party payer perspective was adopted. Time-driven activity-based costing was used to map and estimate costs attributed to ERAS. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the robustness of the results. RESULTS The results of 5 studies, totaling 986 patients, were pooled to generate health state probabilities. ERAS was found to be dominant, being both less expensive and more effective than standard of care. On sensitivity analysis, ERAS becomes cost-ineffective (incremental cost-utility ratio > $50,000/quality-adjusted life year) at an amount > $19,336.75. Length of stay would have to be reduced from 5.96 days to 3.36 days for standard of care to become cost-effective. Monte-Carlo analysis demonstrated ERAS to be the more cost-effective option across a range of willingness-to-pay values. CONCLUSIONS Despite the increased medication and personnel costs attributed to ERAS, it is less costly overall and associated with superior outcomes compared with standard of care. These findings lend additional support to the value of ERAS implementation in microvascular breast reconstruction. Time-driven activity-based costing provides granular estimates and are useful in quality-improvement initiatives. PURPOSE Chronic and persistent exposure to negative stress can lead to adverse consequences on health. Particularly, psychosocial factors were found to increase the risk and outcome of respiratory diseases like asthma. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the most efficient anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma. However, a significant proportion of patients don't respond adequately to GC administration. GC sensitivity is modulated by genetic and acquired disease-related factors. Additionally, it was proposed that endogenous corticosteroids may limit certain actions of synthetic GCs, contributing to insensitivity. Psychological and physiological stresses activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, increasing cortisol levels. Here, we review the mechanism involved in altered GC sensitivity in asthmatic patients under stressful situations. Strategies for modulation GC sensitivity and improving GC therapy are discussed. METHODS PubMed was searched for publications on psychological chronic stress and asthma, GC resistan as posttranscriptional regulators, providing another level of control of GC receptor levels. Empirical results allow postulating that the detection and study of microRNAs might be a promising approach to better characterize and treat asthmatic patients. IMPLICATIONS Many molecular and cellular pathobiological mechanisms are responsible of GC resistance. Therefore detecting specific biomarkers to help identify patients who would benefit from new therapies is crucial. Stress consitutes a negative aspect of current lifestyles that increase asthma morbidity and mortality. Adequate stress management could be an important and positive intervention. (Clin Ther. 2020; 42XXX-XXX) © 2020 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the presence of intracoronary thrombus undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS This study, performed from January 1, 2004, to November 31, 2014, at 55 centers in Korea, was based on the Grand Drug-Eluting Stent registry, which is a Korean, nationwide, multicenter, pooled registry of drug-eluting stents. The registry enrolled all-comers without any exclusion criteria except patient withdrawal of consent. A total of 1329 patients with AMI who had an overt intracoronary thrombus at the initial coronary angiography were analyzed. The efficacy end point was a 1-year major adverse cardiovascular event, defined as a composite of all death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis. The primary safety end point was any 30-day bleeding event. FINDINGS GPIs were associated with a significantly higher rate of any bleeding events at 30 days (0.9% vs 2.9% in the non-GPI and GPI groups, respectively; P = 0.015), whereas GPI use was the only significant independent predictor of 30-day bleeding events by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (hazard ratio = 4.76; 95% CI, 1.66-13.64; P = 0.004). Regarding the efficacy end points, no significant differences were noted according to GPI use (7.0% vs 9.0%, P = 0.287), and GPI use has no significant effect on 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio = 1.33; 95% CI, 0.82-2.15; P = 0.253). IMPLICATIONS Early upstream use of GPIs should not be considered even in the presence of an intracoronary thrombotic occlusion. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03507205. BACKGROUND Suboccipital lateral approach is a common practice in neurosurgery to expose the region of the cerebellopontine angle. Postcraniectomy headache (PCH) is one of the most frequent complications that diminish the quality of life of patients. OBJECTIVE To compare postcraniectomy pain in patients operated on for vestibular neurinomas by a suboccipital lateral approach by 2 different incisions. MATERIAL AND METHODS Prospective randomized research study. Follow-up of patients operated for vestibular neurinomas between July 2017 and May 2019 (n=40) by the same surgeon. One group received the classical linear incision (n=20) and another group the alternative incision in an inverted "U" (modified Dandy) (n=20). Pain intensity was evaluated by numerical scale. A minimum follow-up of 3 months was carried out. The impact on quality of life was measured by the SF-36 questionnaire short version both before and after surgery. RESULTS The average age was 46.1 years. The overall PCH index was 27.5% (n=11) of the patients.
Homepage: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/cp21r7-cp21.html
|
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team