Notes

Permanent magnet resonance neurography results within about three critically sick COVID-19 individuals with fresh onset of extremity peripheral neuropathy.
Objective To evaluate systematically the efficacy of exergames for balance dysfunction in neurological conditions and to identify factors of exergaming protocols that may influence their effects. Methods We searched electronic databases for randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of commercial exergames versus alternative interventions on balance dysfunction as assessed by standard clinical scales in adults with acquired neurological disabilities. Standardized mean differences (Hedge's g) were calculated with random-effects models. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were run to explore potential modifiers of effect size. Results Out of 106 screened articles, 41 fulfilled criteria for meta-analysis, with a total of 1223 patients included. Diseases under investigation were stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, mild cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer's disease, traumatic brain injury, and myelopathy. The pooled effect size of exergames on balance was moderate (g = 0.43, p less then 0.001), with higher frequency (number of sessions per week) associated with larger effect (β = 0.24, p = 0.01). There was no effect mediated by the overall duration of the intervention and intensity of a single session. The beneficial effect of exergames could be maintained for at least 4 weeks after discontinuation, but their retention effect was specifically explored in only 11 studies, thus requiring future investigation. Mild to moderate adverse events were reported in a minority of studies. We estimated a low risk of bias, mainly attributable to the lack of double-blindness and not reporting intention-to-treat analysis. Conclusions The pooled evidence suggests that exergames improve balance dysfunction and are safe in several neurological conditions. The findings of high-frequency interventions associated with larger effect size, together with a possible sustained effect of exergaming, may guide treatment decisions and inform future research.Introduction Whether different mechanisms, particularly ocular pathology, could lead to the emergence of visual hallucinations (VH) (defined as false perceptions with no external stimulus) versus visual illusions (VI) (defined as a misperception of a real stimulus) in Parkinson's disease (PD) remains debated. We assessed retinal, clinical and structural brain characteristics depending on the presence of VH or VI in PD. Methods In this case-control study, we compared retinal thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT), between PD patients with VI (PD-I; n = 26), VH (PD-H; n = 28), and without VI or VH (PD-C; n = 28), and assessed demographic data, disease severity, treatment, anatomical and functional visual complaints, cognitive and visuo-perceptive functions and MRI brain volumetry for each group of PD patients. Results Parafoveal retina was thinner in PD-H compared to PD-C (p = 0.005) and PD-I (p = 0.009) but did not differ between PD-I and PD-C (p = 0.85). Multivariate analysis showed that 1/retinal parafoveal thinning and total brain gray matter atrophy were independently associated with the presence of VH compared to PD-I; 2/retinal parafoveal thickness, PD duration, sleep quality impairment and total brain gray matter volume were independent factors associated with the presence of VH compared to PD-C; 3/anterior ocular abnormalities were the only factor independently associated with the presence of illusions compared to PD-C. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Cisplatin.html Conclusion These findings reinforce the hypothesis that there may be different mechanisms contributing to VH and VI in PD, suggesting that these two entities may also have a different prognosis rather than simply lying along a continuous spectrum. Registration number Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT01114321.Background Neurofilament proteins have been extensively studied in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, where they are promising biomarkers of disease activity and treatment response. Their role in progressive multiple sclerosis, where there is a particularly urgent need for improved biomarkers, is less clear. The objectives of this systematic review are to summarise the literature on neurofilament light and heavy in progressive multiple sclerosis, addressing key questions. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus identified 355 potential sources. 76 relevant sources were qualitatively reviewed using QUADAS-2 criteria, and 17 were identified as at low risk of bias. We summarise the findings from all relevant sources, and separately from the 17 high-quality studies. Results Differences in neurofilament light between relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis appear to be explained by differences in covariates. Neurofilament light is consistently associated with current inflammatory activity and future brain atrophy in progressive multiple sclerosis, and is consistently shown to be a marker of treatment response with immunosuppressive disease-modifying therapies. Associations with current or future disability are inconsistent, and there is no evidence of NFL being a responsive marker of purportedly neuroprotective treatments. Evidence on neurofilament heavy is more limited and inconsistent. Conclusions Neurofilament light has shown consistent utility as a biomarker of neuroinflammation, future brain atrophy and immunosuppressive treatment response at a group level. Neither neurofilament light or heavy has shown a consistent treatment response to neuroprotective disease-modifying therapies, which will require further data from successful randomised controlled trials.Angiotensin II exerts a cardinal role in the pathogenesis of hypertension and renal injury via action of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors. Local renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activity is essential for the mechanisms mediating pathophysiological functions. Proximal tubular angiotensinogen and tubular AT1 receptors are augmented by intrarenal angiotensin II. Caveolin 1 plays an important role as a regulatory molecule for the compartmentalization of redox signaling events through angiotensin II-induced NADPH oxidase activation in the kidney. A role for the renin-angiotensin system in the development and/or maintenance of hypertension has been demonstrated in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Many effects of angiotensin II are dependent on the AT1 stimulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by NADPH oxidase. Angiotensin II upregulation stimulates oxidative stress in proximal tubules from SHR. The NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox4) is abundantly expressed in kidney proximal tubule cells. Induction of the stress response includes synthesis of heat shock protein 70, a molecular chaperone that has a critical role in the recovery of cells from stress and in cytoprotection, guarding cells from subsequent insults.
Read More: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Cisplatin.html