Notesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb108/eb108e1225c6a34726896a3a71243e18df6f7721" alt="what is notes.io? What is notes.io?"
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
Infections caused by pathogens of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, i. e., tuberculosis (TB), and the non-infectious, autoimmune disease sarcoidosis are among the most common granulomatous diseases worldwide. Typically, the lung is the primary site of infection and manifestation, respectively which makes the two diseases important differential diagnoses. Both diseases can affect virtually all organ systems, albeit with significantly lower incidence. CASE PRESENTATION We report the case of a 50-year-old Indian man presenting with a tuberculous perihepatic abscess and a systemic inflammatory response after being diagnosed with neurosarcoidosis presenting as a single granuloma in the frontal lobe with lymphadenopathy in 2014. On day of admission the patient presented with right upper abdominal pain and fever for two weeks. With increased inflammatory parameters in serum and after finding of external CT images, a perihepatic abscess was suspected. This encapsulated cave was drained percutaneously under CT control. A high concentration of acid-fast rods was detected using ZN, PCR was positive for M. tuberculosis. Several samples of sputum and urine were microscopically negative but yielded growth of Mycobacteria after four weeks. DISCUSSION This is a case presenting with two different granulomatous diseases, each of which manifested itself in an atypical form. The tuberculous liver abscess might either be explained as a flare-up of latent tuberculosis under azathioprine therapy or as a reinfection acquired during one of several visits in the high-prevalence country India. In addition, it must be discussed whether the cerebral granuloma in 2014 could have been an early stage of tuberculous granuloma. Sensitivity of ZN staining is significantly reduced in cerebral samples, and negative PCR-results might be due to low germ load or methodical issues, e. g., decreased sensitivity in formalin fixated samples.Non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare complication, and the management has to be determined individually based on the extent and severity of the presentation. We report on a 37-year-old male patient with non-cirrhotic chronic PVT related to a severe thrombophilia, comprising APS, antithrombin-, factor V- and factor X-deficiency. Three years after the initial diagnosis of non-cirrhotic PVT, the patient presented with severe hemorrhagic shock related to acute bleeding from esophageal varices, requiring an emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS). TIPSS was revised after a recurrent bleeding episode due to insufficient reduction of the portal pressure. Additionally, embolization of the dilated V. Selleckchem PRI-724 coronaria ventriculi led to the regression of esophageal varices but resulted simultaneously in a left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH) with development of stomach wall and perisplenic varices. After a third episode of acute esophageal varices bleeding, a surgical distal splenorenal shunt (Warren shunt) was performed to reduce the LSPH. Despite anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin and antithrombin substitution, endoluminal thrombosis led to a complete Warren shunt occlusion, aggravating the severe splenomegaly and pancytopenia. Finally, a partial spleen embolization (PSE) was performed. In the postinterventional course, leukocyte and platelet counts increased rapidly and the patient showed no further bleeding episodes. Overall, this complex course demonstrates the need for individual assessment of multimodal treatment options in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. This young patient required triple modality porto-systemic pressure reduction (TIPSS, Warren shunt, PSE) and involved finely balanced anticoagulation and bleeding control.
To analyze safety and effectiveness of simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization (PHVE) or sequential hepatic vein embolization (HVE) compared to portal vein embolization (PVE) for future remnant liver (FRL) hypertrophy prior to major hepatic surgery.
Patients undergoing PVE, PHVE or HVE at our tertiary care center between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively included. FRLV, standardized FRLV (sFRLV) and sFRLV growth rate per day were assessed via volumetry, as well as laboratory parameters.
36 patients (f = 15, m = 21; median 64.5 y) were included, 16 patients received PHVE and 20 patients PVE, of which 4received sequential HVE. Significant increase of FRLV was achieved with both PVE and PHVE compared to baseline (p < 0.0001). sFRLV growth rate did not significantly differ following PHVE (2.2 ± 1.2 %/d) or PVE (2.2 ± 1.7 %/d, p = 0.94). Left portal vein thrombosis (LPVT) was observed after PHVE in 6 patients and in 1 patient after PVE. Sequential HVE showed a considerably high growth rate of 1.42 ± 0.45 %/d after PVE.
PHVE effectively induces FRL hypertrophy but yields comparable sFRLV to PVE. Sequential HVE further induces hypertrophy after insufficient growth due to PVE. Considering a potentially higher rate of LPVT after PHVE, PVE might be preferred in patients with moderate baseline sFRLV, with optional sequential HVE in non-sufficient responders.
PHVE effectively induces FRL hypertrophy but yields comparable sFRLV to PVE. Sequential HVE further induces hypertrophy after insufficient growth due to PVE. Considering a potentially higher rate of LPVT after PHVE, PVE might be preferred in patients with moderate baseline sFRLV, with optional sequential HVE in non-sufficient responders.
In the management of patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion is well-established but common recommendations in the follow up management are inconsistent. Doppler sonography is commonly used for detection for TIPS dysfunction whilst data on the impact of elective invasive examinations are scarce.
The aim of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate potential benefits of elective invasive examinations in the follow up management of patients after TIPS insertion METHODS Data of all patients receiving TIPS at the university hospitals of Muenster and Bonn between 2013 and 2018 (n = 534) were collected. The impact of performance of elective invasive examinations at 12 months after TIPS insertion on the occurrence of liver related events (LREs) and frequency of TIPS revisions within 24 months after TIPS insertion was analyzed.
No significant differences were found concerning occurrence of liver related events after 24 months depending on whether an elective invasive examination was performed.
Read More: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/pri-724.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team