Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
The majority of adults are seropositive for human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6). HHV-6 reactivation can occur after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and lead to life-threatening central nervous system disorders. In this prospective study, we evaluated the relationship between HHV-6 reactivation and anti-HHV-6 IgG antibody levels in recipients of allogeneic HSCT. The HHV-6 viral load in the plasma was quantitatively measured weekly after allogeneic HSCT by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The level of anti-HHV-6 IgG antibody was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before and serially after transplantation. In 28 of the 56 evaluated patients (50%), HHV-6 reactivation was detected after transplantation. In a multivariate analysis, cord blood as the stem cell source was the only significant factor associated with HHV-6 reactivation (odds ratio, 8.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 32.6; P less then .01). click here When evaluated in the recipients of cord blood transplantation (CBT), the anti-HHV-6 antibody level before transplantation was significantly lower in the patients with HHV-6 reactivation compared with those without (sample positivity index median, 2.04 [range, 0.95 to 5.98] versus 4.15 [range, 3.93 to 5.65]; P less then .05). The anti-HHV-6 antibody level was significantly decreased at 3 months post-transplantation compared with before transplantation (P less then .01). Such differences were not observed in other stem cell sources. Our results demonstrate that the low anti-HHV-6 antibody level before transplantation was associated with the reactivation of HHV-6 after CBT, and that the anti-HHV-6 antibody level was significantly decreased specifically after CBT. These results suggest that HHV-6-specific humoral immunity plays a role in HHV-6 reactivation after CBT.The use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for consolidation therapy in patients with core binding factor (CBF) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with intermediate- and adverse-risk genetics remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 286 CBF-AML patients with intermediate- and adverse-risk genetics in first complete remission following consolidation with chemotherapy (n = 122), auto-HSCT (n = 27), or allo-HSCT (n = 137) between January 2009 and December 2018 at our center. Patients with allo-HSCT showed superior 5-year overall survival (OS; 74% versus 38% or 49%; P less then .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; 74% versus 26% or 49%; P less then .001) and lower cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR; 9% versus 69% or 31%; P less then .001) compared with chemotherapy alone or auto-HSCT. In the allo-HSCT group, minimal residual disease (MRD) at the second and third months after allo-HSCT could predict relapse in t(8;21) patients (2 months PCIR = .002; 3 months PCIR less then .001) but not in inv(16) patients. Moreover, positive MRD after 2 courses of consolidation chemotherapy before allo-HSCT was an independent risk factor for survival in CBF-AML patients with intermediate- and adverse-risk genetics, whereas haploidentical donor (haplo-) HSCT could overcome the adverse prognosis (5-year OS, 87%; 5-year PFS, 81%; 5-year CIR, 7%). Allo-HSCT could be the optimal first-line consolidation therapy for patients with intermediate- and adverse-risk genetics, and haplo-HSCT could improve survival for patients with positive MRD after 2 courses of consolidation chemotherapy.The optimal myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for patients undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) is unknown. We studied the outcomes of total body irradiation (TBI)-based versus chemotherapy (CT)-based MAC regimens in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The study included 427 patients who underwent first haplo-HCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), following TBI-based (n = 188; 44%) or CT-based (n = 239; 56%) MAC. The median patient age was 32 years. Fludarabine-TBI (72%) and thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (65%) were the most frequently used TBI- and CT-based regimens, respectively. In the TBI and CT cohorts, 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 45% versus 37% (P = .05), overall survival (OS) was 51% versus 47% (P = .18), relapse incidence (RI) was 34% versus 32% (P = .44), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 21% versus 31% (P less then .01). In the multivariate analysis, TBI was associated with lower NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.86; P = .01), better LFS (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.98; P =.04), and increased risk for grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.34; P = .02) compared with CT-based MAC. The type of conditioning regimen did not impact RI, chronic GVHD, OS, or GVHD-free, relapse-free survival after adjusting for transplantation-related variables. TBI-based MAC was associated with lower NRM and better LFS compared with CT-based MAC in patients with ALL after haplo-HCT/PTCy.TCRαβ/CD19-depleted HCT has been used with excellent outcomes in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies, and several studies have demonstrated rapid immune reconstitution in the nonmalignant setting. However, immune recovery following TCRαβ/CD19-depleted hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for malignancy remains incompletely elucidated. Furthermore, the majority of studies to date have used haploidentical and matched unrelated donors. Here we report results of immune reconstitution following TCRαβ/CD19-depleted HCT for hematologic malignancy in 51 pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies, the majority of whom received grafts from unrelated donors. Grafts were from matched unrelated (n = 20), mismatched unrelated (n = 20), and haploidentical (n = 11) donors. The median CD34+ cell dose was 10.2 × 106/kg (range, 4.54 to 20 × 106/kg), and the median TCRαβ+ cell dose was 2.53 × 104/kg (range, 0 to 44.9 × 104/kg). Conditioning was myeloablative with either busulfan or total body irradiation, iagnosis, donor source, TCRαβ+ T cell dose, conditioning regimen, or use of antithymocyte globulin. B cell recovery mirrored T cell recovery, and i.v. Ig was discontinued at a median of 8 months (range, 4 to 22 months) post-HCT in patients alive and relapse-free at last follow-up. Immune reconstitution is rapid following TCRαβ/CD19-depleted HCT in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. Donor graft source, haploidentical or unrelated, did not affect immune reconstitution. Viral reactivation is common in the first 100 days post-HCT, indicating that improved T cell defense is needed in the early post-HCT period.
Read More: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/epacadostat-incb024360.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team