Notes

Theoretical Foundations of Psychometrics
Psychometrics, a specialized branch of psychology, concerns the theory and technique of psychological measurement. It involves the development and validation of assessment instruments, including questionnaires, tests, and other tools created to measure psychological constructs such as intelligence, personality traits, and mental health status. The theoretical foundations of psychometrics are anchored in principles based on classical test theory (CTT), item response theory (IRT), and factor analysis.

Classical Test Theory
Classical Test Theory (CTT) posits that an observed score on a psychological test is composed of a true score and an error score (Spearman, 1904). The true score reflects the actual attribute level of the individual, while the error score encapsulates random fluctuations that may affect the observed score. CTT offers foundational concepts such as reliability and validity. Reliability denotes the consistency of a measurement instrument, while validity pertains to the extent to which an instrument measures what it claims to measure (Cronbach & Meehl, 1955).

In CTT, reliability is quantified using various indices, such as Cronbach's alpha, which evaluates internal consistency (Cronbach, 1951). Validity is multidimensional, including content validity, criterion-related validity, and construct validity. Content validity ensures that the instrument comprehensively covers the construct domain, criterion-related validity examines the correlation between the instrument and an external criterion, and construct validity measures the extent to which the instrument aligns with theoretical expectations regarding the construct (Messick, 1989).

Item Response Theory
Item Response Theory (IRT) constitutes a paradigm shift from CTT, focusing on the relationship between an individual's latent trait and their item responses. IRT models, such as the Rasch model and the two-parameter logistic (2PL) model, offer a probabilistic framework for examining item characteristics and individual abilities (Rasch, 1960; Birnbaum, 1968). These models presume that the probability of a correct response is a logistic function of the difference between the person's ability and the item's difficulty.

IRT provides several advantages over CTT, including invariant item parameters and the capacity to provide detailed item-level information. For example, the Rasch model asserts that the probability of a correct response is determined solely by the difference between person ability and item difficulty, permitting the comparison of items across different populations. Furthermore, IRT facilitates the development of adaptive testing, where the difficulty of subsequent items is contingent upon the examinee's responses to prior items, thereby increasing measurement precision and efficiency (Weiss, 1982).

Factor Analysis
Factor analysis is a statistical technique utilized to identify underlying dimensions, or factors, that explain the correlations among observed variables. It is essential in the development of theoretical constructs and the refinement of measurement instruments. Factor analysis can be exploratory (EFA) or confirmatory (CFA), each performing distinct purposes (Thurstone, 1931; Jöreskog, 1969).

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is intended to uncover the underlying structure of a dataset without imposing a predefined model. It includes extracting factors, estimating factor loadings, and determining the number of factors based on criteria such as eigenvalues and scree plots (Kaiser, 1960). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), conversely, tests a hypothesized factor structure against empirical data. It delivers fit indices, such as the chi-square statistic, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and comparative fit index (CFI), to assess the model's adequacy (Hu & Bentler, 1999).

Integrative Perspectives
The theoretical underpinnings of psychometrics are not separate but rather integrative. For instance, modern psychometric approaches often combine principles from CTT and IRT to improve measurement robustness. Factor analysis is frequently used in conjunction with IRT to validate the dimensionality of constructs and improve item selection.

Furthermore, the integration of advanced statistical techniques, such as structural equation modeling (SEM) and multi-level modeling, has enhanced the psychometric landscape. These methodologies facilitate the simultaneous examination of measurement models and structural relationships among latent variables, thereby delivering a comprehensive understanding of psychological constructs (Bollen, 1989; Goldstein, 1995).

Conclusion
The theoretical foundations of psychometrics are pivotal in the accurate measurement of psychological attributes. Classical Test Theory, Item Response Theory, and Factor Analysis each contribute critical concepts and methodologies to the field. As psychometric research advances, the integration of these theories continues to evolve, providing enhanced precision, validity, and reliability in psychological assessment.

References

Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some Latent Trait Models and Their Use in Inferring an Examinee’s Ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct Validity in Psychological Tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281-302.
Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel Statistical Models. Arnold.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A General Approach to Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183-202.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141-151.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). American Council on Education and Macmillan.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Danmarks Pædagogiske Institut.
Spearman, C. (1904). The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things. American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72-101.
Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Multiple Factor Analysis. Psychological Review, 38(5), 406-427.
Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 473-492.
https://rentry.co/9sxnkrm7

My Website: https://rentry.co/9sxnkrm7