Notes

The actual Landscape in the Tumor Microenvironment throughout Skin Cutaneous Most cancers Shows the Prognostic and Immunotherapeutically Related Gene Unique.
The majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the event enhanced learning and confidence in working together to provide interprofessional care. Students seemed to find the OSCE to be particularly valuable. Feedback suggestions for improvement indicated a desire for more activities and time allocated to the event. SUMMARY We designed and implemented a pilot intraprofessional event that was well-received by pharmacy students and pharmacy technician students. This supports the development of future similar events. INTRODUCTION Student pharmacists have historically served in shadowing roles for their experiential training at our institution. However, engaging students through active learning assignments has the potential to benefit both the student and the institution. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the impact of student pharmacists on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores, a direct reflection of patient satisfaction within the hospital. Selleckchem FI-6934 METHODS In a four-month quality-improvement pilot project, student pharmacists were given active learning assignments directed at helping patients understand the purpose and side effects of their medications. Patients with hospital-initiated medications were provided with medication cards via student pharmacist-run counseling programs. The primary outcome was top response ("always") in medication-related HCAHPS scores. Secondary outcomes included scores on individual questions, number of medication education encounters, number of interventions, cost savings, and student feedback. RESULTS There were 482 medication education encounters. The top response for all medication-related HCAHPS scores improved by 14% (49% to 63%). Top response regarding medication indication increased 23% (63% to 86%). There were 552 interventions accepted, projecting a savings of $135,658. The top score on student evaluations of the practice site increased 20% (69% to 89%). CONCLUSIONS Student pharmacists can have a meaningful impact on medication-related HCAHPS scores. Additionally, student pharmacists benefit from active learning opportunities by providing and improving patient care leading to a more meaningful experience. INTRODUCTION To measure changes in student professionalism from co-curricular activities. METHODS A prospective cohort study followed first-year pharmacy students at The University of Texas at El Paso School of Pharmacy. Students completed one co-curricular activity each semester. Learning was assessed using the RxPro VALUE rubric and Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT) at the beginning and end of the first professional year. The RxPro VALUE rubric included six domains (connections to experience, lifelong learning, diversity of communities and cultures, civic identity and commitment, empathy, and reflection and self-assessment) and was rated from 0 (not yet applied) to 4 (exemplary). The PAT contained 33-items in five domains (reliability, responsibility, and accountability; lifelong learning and adaptability; relationships with others; upholding principles of integrity and respect; and citizenship and professional engagement) and was rated from 1 (knows) to 5 (teaches) (maximum score = 165). RESULTS Mean scores on the RxPro VALUE rubric increased (p less then 0.05) from baseline to end of year in five domains connections to experience (1.44 vs. 2.07), diversity of communities and cultures (1.75 vs. 2.3), civic identity and commitment (1.34 vs. 2.33), empathy (1.44 vs. 2.37), and reflection and self-assessment (1.53 vs 2.19). No significant changes were seen in PAT scores from baseline (M = 114.19, standard deviation = 32.832) to end of year (M = 119.56, standard deviation = 29.63, p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS The RxPro VALUE rubric detected growth in professional behaviors among first-year doctor of pharmacy students, while no significant change was observed in the PAT. INTRODUCTION The use of technology in the classroom has continued to grow, and with the advancement of classroom management systems and online exam software, there are opportunities to administer exams electronically. This study assessed the impact of electronic-based assessments on examination scores in a required therapeutics course. METHODS This was a retrospective, single-centered, observational study including second professional year pharmacy students enrolled in a required, one semester therapeutics course. Four assessments were administered each semester. Lecture content and exam format, a mixture of multiple-choice questions and free response written cases, did not differ significantly between years. Assessments administered during the first two years were printed on paper, while assessments administered during the third and fourth year of the study were all electronic, submitted through a classroom management system. Following institutional review board approval, the change in mean overall examination scores between paper and electronic-based assessments were analyzed. RESULTS Of the 948 students enrolled in this study, there was no difference in overall mean scores between paper and electronic-based assessments (74.8% vs. 73.8%). In addition, there was no difference in mean examination scores between overall individual paper and electronic Exam 1 through 4 or overall multiple-choice or free response scores between paper and electronic-based assessments. CONCLUSIONS Scores did not differ between paper and electronic-based assessments. From this study, test method does not appear to impact exam results. INTRODUCTION It is unknown when and how often competency assessments should occur in pharmacy education. Using inhaler technique as an example competency, the study objectives were to measure the proportion of near-graduation students demonstrating correct technique approximately one year after initial training and to measure reliability between assessors. METHODS A sample of 45 near-graduation pharmacy students with prior education on correct inhaler technique participated in this direct observation study at the University of Otago. Five trained assessors simultaneously rated each participant's inhaler technique demonstration using a checklist. RESULTS Of 37 participants demonstrating a pressurized metered dose inhaler, 21.62% demonstrated correct technique. No participants among eight volunteers demonstrated proper use of a dry powder inhaler. On average, two steps were performed correctly for each inhaler type. Steps with the highest error rate were "hold the inhaler upright and shake well," "breath out gently, away from the inhaler," and "keep breathing in slowly and deeply".
Homepage: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/caerulein.html