Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
c fractures managed with revision THA increased, whereas ORIF decreased. Our findings are encouraging considering the significant burden an increase in periprosthetic fracture incidence would present to the health care system in terms of both expense and patient morbidity.
Constrained acetabular liners (CALs) are used in both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty in cases where stability and abductor deficiency are of concern. The efficacy of CALs has been shown to be design dependent. There is clear evidence that the use of small head sizes and shorter offset in unconstrained total hip arthroplasty is associated with higher rates of dislocation. To our knowledge, no such study has assessed the effect of femoral head size, neck length, and offset for CALs.
We performed a retrospective study assessing the outcomes of CALs with minimum 2-year follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted for all patients and for patients revised for instability. A binomial regression analysis was performed to assess for variables significantly associated with CAL failure.
A total of 285 CALs in 281 patients were identified with a mean follow-up of 5.7 years. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were as follows all indication 91.9% vs instability 85.5% (P= .15). Increasing neck length was associated with lower rates of failure (odds ratio, 0.81; P= .042). Femoral head size, offset, and abductor reconstruction were not significantly associated with CAL failure.
Larger head size has not been demonstrated to lead to lower failure in CALs. Increasing neck length was associated with lower failure rate. Surgeons should be cautious when attempting to ream to larger acetabular shell sizes for the purpose of using larger heads with CALs. Increasing neck length may instead be targeted intraoperatively.
Larger head size has not been demonstrated to lead to lower failure in CALs. Increasing neck length was associated with lower failure rate. click here Surgeons should be cautious when attempting to ream to larger acetabular shell sizes for the purpose of using larger heads with CALs. Increasing neck length may instead be targeted intraoperatively.
Computed tomography (CT) scan is the standard for assessment of femoral torsion. This observational study was conducted to evaluate the comparability of the EOS radiation dose scanning system (EOS imaging, Paris, France) and the CT scan in patients with suspected torsional malalignment of the femur.
Patients with suspected torsional malalignment of the femur were included in a study for surgical planning. The primary endpoint was to compare the 3-dimensional radiological (EOS) imaging system with the CT scan to determine femoral anteversion (AV) angle. Three independent raters performed measurements. Comparability of CT scan and EOS values was assessed by Pearson correlation, t test, interobserver reliability, and intraobserver reliability (Cronbach alpha).
About 34 femora were examined. Interobserver reliability/intraobserver reliability was 0.911 of 0.955 for EOS and 0.934 of 0.934 for CT scan. EOS system revealed an AV angle of 12.2° ± 10.0° (-15.0° to 32.0°). CT examinations showed an AV angle of 12.6° ± 9.2° (-3.2° to 35.6°). About 11 hips featured physiological AV, 14 hips showed decreased AV (<10°) or retroversion (<0°), and 9 hips showed increased AV (>20°). Overall, a strong Pearson correlation of τ= 0.855 and a highly significant correlation in the t test for both methods was seen. In patients with decreased AV, retroversion, or increased AV, Pearson correlation only resulted in a moderate/low correlation of τ= 0.495 and τ= 0.292. The t test showed no significant correlation at malrotation.
In torsional malalignment, EOS does not have correlation with CT measurements. In contrast to CT scan, EOS allows femoral torsion measurement independent of legs' positioning.
In torsional malalignment, EOS does not have correlation with CT measurements. In contrast to CT scan, EOS allows femoral torsion measurement independent of legs' positioning.
The impairment of short-term heart rate regulation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) can cause acute hemodynamic collapse. Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) is a useful tool for the diagnosis of heart diseases and the prediction of mortality. In DFA, the short-term scaling exponent α is decreased in heart failure. However, its change in HFpEF patients remains unclear.
Twenty patients diagnosed with HFpEF [defined as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) >100 pg/mL, ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%, and without significant valvular disease], 20 diagnosed with non-HFpEF (BNP > 100 pg/mL and EF < 50%), and 20 control subjects generally matched for age and gender were enrolled. Holter electrocardiography was performed, and heart rate variability was calculated. In the DFA, the scaling exponents in 1000 beats were calculated for each 15-min segment and the average of all segments was used. We compared both the short-term (<11 beats, α1) and long-term (≥11 beats, α2) scaling exponents among the three groups.
In the HFpEF, non-HFpEF, and control groups, α1 was 0.73 ± 0.27, 0.66 ± 0.29, and 1.01 ± 0.20 (p < 0.01), and α2 was 0.95 ± 0.08, 0.88 ± 0.11, and 0.96 ± 0.07 (p < 0.01), respectively. The α1 exponent was significantly decreased in the HFpEF group (p < 0.01 vs. control) and the non-HFpEF group (p < 0.01 vs. control), while the α2 exponent was significantly decreased in the non-HFpEF group only (p < 0.05 vs. HFpEF and control).
Short-term heart rate regulation is impaired in patients with HFpEF, while patients with non-HFpEF have both short-term and long-term impairment.
Short-term heart rate regulation is impaired in patients with HFpEF, while patients with non-HFpEF have both short-term and long-term impairment.
Calcium deposits on heart valves are considered a local manifestation of atherosclerosis and are associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes. The clinical significance of cardiac calcifications among heart failure (HF) patients, as assessed by echocardiography, is unknown. This study evaluated associations of cardiac calcifications with mortality and hospital admissions in this specific population.
Medical records of all patients who initiated ambulatory surveillance at our HF clinic during 2011-2018 were reviewed. Calcifications in the aortic valve, aortic root, or the mitral valve were evaluated. Patients with moderate to severe regurgitation or stenosis of the aortic or mitral valves were excluded. The primary endpoint was the composite of long-term all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations. Secondary endpoints were long-term all-cause mortality and more than one hospitalization due to HF.
This retrospective study included 814 patients (mean age 70.9 ± 13 years, 63.2% male). Of the total cohort, 350 (43%) had no cardiac calcifications and 464 (57%) had at least 1 calcified site.
Homepage: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic-acid-alpha-chca.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team