Notesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb108/eb108e1225c6a34726896a3a71243e18df6f7721" alt="what is notes.io? What is notes.io?"
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
tients with both reduced eGFR and albuminuria.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01730534.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01730534.Personality plays an important role in performance in medical education and mentorship. Personality assessment can aid in the ability to identify strengths and areas for development by understanding how one's personality influences their learning and interpersonal relationships. We sought to evaluate personality assessment as an effective tool in mentoring during orthopaedic residency in this prospective, cross-sectional study from two orthopaedic surgery residency programs using the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI). Participants completed a survey regarding their experience with the assessment. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and two-sample t-tests were used to examine differences between groups. In total, thirty-four individuals completed the survey. Our results showed 82.4% reported that the HPI very accurately represented them and 58.8% reported better understanding potentially perceived strengths and weaknesses. In total, 75.7% and 72.7% were satisfied with their mentorship about development as a clinician and researcher, respectively. Significant differences were seen between participants who did and did not re-review their results, and participants who did and did-not believe their results profile was accurate. We conclude that personality assessments can be valuable in promoting introspection and strengthening relationships within orthopaedic surgery, particularly when they are valued and emphasized by the user. Our results suggest that use of the HPI provided participants with a better understanding of their perceived strengths and weaknesses as they progress through their orthopaedic residency training.
Inhaled bronchodilators are the first-line treatment for asthma exacerbations, but individual bronchodilator response (BDR) varies by race and ethnicity. Studies have examined BDR's genetic underpinnings, but many did not include children or were not conducted during an asthma exacerbation. This pilot study tested single-nucleotide polymorphisms' (SNPs') association with pediatric African American BDR during an acute asthma exacerbation.
This was a study of pediatric asthma patients in the age group 2-18 years treated in the emergency department for an asthma exacerbation. We measured BDR before and after inhaled bronchodilator treatments using both the Pediatric Asthma Severity Score (PASS) and asthma severity score. We collected genomic DNA and examined whether 21 candidate SNPs from a review of the literature were associated with BDR using crude odds ratios (OR) and adjusted analysis.
The final sample population was 53 children, with an average age of 7.2 years. The average initial PASS score (scale of ascending severity from 0 to 6) was 2.5. After adjusting for BMI, age category, gender and smoke exposure, rs912142 was associated with decreased odds of having low BDR (OR, 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.92), and rs7081864 and rs7903366 were associated with decreased odds of having high BDR (OR, 0.097; 95% CI, 0.009-0.62).
We found three SNPs significantly associated with pediatric African American BDR that provide information regarding a child's potential response to emergency asthma exacerbation treatment. Once validated in larger studies, such information could guide pharmacogenomic evidence-based emergency asthma treatment to improve patient outcomes.
We found three SNPs significantly associated with pediatric African American BDR that provide information regarding a child's potential response to emergency asthma exacerbation treatment. Once validated in larger studies, such information could guide pharmacogenomic evidence-based emergency asthma treatment to improve patient outcomes.
To estimate the population-based incidence and determine the types of severe infection experienced by patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are taking biological agents.
Since the late 1990 s, a variety of biological and synthetic drugs have been developed to treat rheumatoid arthritis. In recent years, the incidence of severe infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Western nations has been reported by observational studies; however, no systematic review has been conducted on this topic.
The following criteria will be considered for inclusion i) observational studies on patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are on biological treatment; ii) studies reporting the number of severe infections requiring hospitalization for treatment; and iii) studies with person-years of observational data.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science will be searched to identify published studies. The reference list of all studies that are selected for critical appraisal will be screened for additional studies. The search for unpublished studies will include MedNar and OpenGrey.
PROSPERO CRD42020175137.
PROSPERO CRD42020175137.
The objective of this review is to review the existing evidence on definitions, concepts, measurement instruments, and interventions for chronic fatigue in spinal cord injury.
Chronic fatigue in people with spinal cord injury is an under-studied issue that affects between 25% and 56.6% of people with spinal cord injury. There are questions about how it is defined and managed due to its complex, multifactorial nature and relationship with related conditions. No overview of chronic fatigue in spinal cord injury exists and we are in need of a shared definition of chronic fatigue, as well as a comprehensive review of concepts and evidence supporting outcome instruments and interventions.
This review will include empirical and non-empirical studies that focus on definitions, concepts, measurement instruments, and interventions for chronic fatigue in spinal cord injury. Studies that focus on peripheral muscle fatigue will only be included if they include chronic fatigue as a secondary outcome.
This review wa narrative summary.
The objective of this scoping review is to describe healthcare organizational structures and processes that support implementation of nurse-led, evidence-based practice projects resulting in improvements in outcome measures.
Many health care organizations claim to support evidence-based practice methodology; however, a gap exists between knowledge generation and its use in routine clinical practice. Proteasome inhibitor This scoping review protocol appraises the status of organizational factors impacting implementation of evidence-based practices and reported outcomes.
This scoping review will consider all literature that includes descriptions of health care organizations' structures or support of evidence-based nursing programs or efforts that include outcomes. Health care organizations are defined as primary/secondary/tertiary, public/private, for profit/non-profit hospitals, medical centers, or multi-hospital systems. Literature will be excluded if the evidence-based practice project does not report the organizational structures that supported the implementation for the project.
Here's my website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/MLN-2238.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team