Notesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb108/eb108e1225c6a34726896a3a71243e18df6f7721" alt="what is notes.io? What is notes.io?"
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
BACKGROUND In December 2014, Nguyen et al. introduced the Upper Tract Dilation (UTD) classification scheme, hoping to unify multiple disciplines when describing ultrasound imaging of congenital hydronephrosis. We hypothesized that the academic community has been slow to adopt its use in publications. PRIMARY AIM To evaluate which hydronephrosis grading systems were currently preferred in publications. STUDY DESIGN A PubMed® search for hydronephrosis was performed, and abstracts between May 2017 and May 2019 were reviewed. The following data points were collected from the 197 manuscripts meeting inclusion criteria journal, first and senior author specialty, country, type of article, primary pathology, and classification of hydronephrosis when present. Differences between use of classification system, and author specialty, manuscript type, and pathology were evaluated. RESULTS First and/or senior author specialties were most commonly pediatric urology, urology, pediatric surgery, and pediatric nephrology. The meneral or for specific diagnoses. Another weakness is that this study does not quantify what, if any, systems are used clinically. Some attempt to provide objective classification would help clarify the implications of the manuscript for research or clinical applications. Reviewers should ensure that where possible, adequate descriptions of hydronephrosis are included. Education outreach to other specialties may help increase objective grading in research. CONCLUSIONS The UTD system is not commonly utilized in the literature. SFU grading is applied most commonly, followed by APD measurements. Over one third of manuscripts used no classification system or descriptive terminology. AIMS To screen for depression in diabetes and evaluate the contributing factors in a primary care setting in India. To evaluate the relationship of depression with perceived quality of life. METHODS We used convenience sampling method in this cross-sectional study. RK24466 388 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled over a period of one year. 50.3% patients screened positive on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) out of which 21.4% reported moderate to severe depression. Male gender, middle age and poor glycaemic control were associated with depression. In stepwise linear regression analysis when depression category was included as an independent variable, significant difference in regression equations were found. Other independent variables which were included in regression equation were age, education, gender, income lifestyle, glycosylated haemoglobin and Body Mass Index whereas dependent variables were transformed domains of World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire. RESULTS There is high prevalence of depression in primary care in type 2 diabetes patients in this Indian setting. Depression was strongly associated with all four domains of quality of life. Highest association with depression was seen in Physical domain (β -0.385, p = 0.000) followed by Social domain (β -0.372, p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS High prevalence of depression and its association with poor quality of life indicates need for improved recognition of depression for improving diabetes outcomes in this centre. OBJECTIVE The use of intraoperative ultrasound guidance for second-trimester elective dilation and curettage reduces the incidence of uterine perforation. However, the role of intraoperative ultrasound guidance during curettage following second-trimester delivery has not been evaluated. We aim to evaluate the effect of intraoperative ultrasound guidance during curettage following second-trimester delivery. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included patients who had a second-trimester delivery at up to 236/7 weeks gestation and underwent uterine curettage after the fetus was delivered. RESULTS Overall, 273 patients were included, and of them 194 (71%) underwent curettage without intraoperative ultrasound guidance, while 79 (29%) underwent the procedure utilizing intraoperative ultrasound guidance. The overall rate of a composite adverse outcome was higher among those undergoing curettage under intraoperative ultrasound guidance compared with no ultrasound guidance (31 [39.2%] vs. 40 [20.6%]; OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.4-4.4, P = 0.002). Placental morbidity (10 [12.6%] vs. 11 [5.6%]; OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.01-5.9, P = 0.04) and infectious complications (6 [7.5%] vs. 5 [2.5%]; OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.01-10.4, P = 0.05) were more frequent among those undergoing curettage with intraoperative ultrasound guidance. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, intraoperative ultrasound guidance was the only independent factor positively associated with the occurrence of an adverse outcome (adjusted OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.1-3.4, P = 0.02). Procedure time was longer when ultrasound guidance was used (952 vs. 658 mins; P less then 0.001). CONCLUSION Intraoperative ultrasound guidance during curettage after second-trimester delivery is associated with a higher complication rate than no guidance. OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of fetal fibronectin (fFN) and cervical phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (phIGFBP-1) tests, individually and in combination, to predict preterm delivery within 48 hours, 7 days and 14 days in symptomatic women. METHOD We selected women in Victoria, British Columbia, who presented between January 2008 and December 2017 at 6 contractions per hour). We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) for independent and concurrent testing and conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to ensure appropriate test utilization. RESULTS We identified 2911 cases. Both fFN and phIGFBP-1 tests showed high and comparable NPV in predicting risk of delivery within 48 hours, 7 days and 14 days (fFN 99.3%, 98.5% and 97.3%; phIGFBP-1 98.8%, 97.9% and 96.1%). In 1976 cases, samples for fFN and phIGFBP-1 tests were collected and analyzed concurrently. Concurrent analysis increased specificity (90.8%, 91.4%, and 91.8%) and PPV (11.8%, 19.8% and 24.2%). Independently, both tests had comparable sensitivity, while the fFN test had higher specificity. Concurrent testing offered the highest PPV. The net gain in PPV comes with a clinically insignificant net loss ( less then 1%) in NPV when compared with either of the tests individually. CONCLUSION Clinical usefulness of PPV for either test is limited. Routine concurrent testing comes with additional costs, and fFN has additional collection requirements. Point-of-care phIGFBP-1 testing has proven to be cheaper, simpler, and equally effective. Ordering physicians should be provided with education on how to interpret test results and should have protocols to guide clinical decision making.
Read More: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/rk-24466.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team