Notes

Semplice Synthesis of Chiral Arylamines, Alkylamines along with Amides by Enantioselective NiH-Catalyzed Hydroamination.
ly suicidal, and among the general population.
The aim of this work is to identify and analyze the key positions of the ECHR in the context of respect for the right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter - the Convention)) of a person suffering from mental disorders in criminal proceedings concerning the application of compulsory medical measures (hereinafter referred to as CMM); formulation of scientifically substantiated proposals for determining the restriction legality criteria of the right of a person suffering from a mental disorder to personal participation in the trial.

Materials and methods During the preparation of the article, the following was processed scientific research on ensuring the rights of persons suffering from mental disorders in criminal proceedings; provisions of international agreements on the provision of psychiatric care; the legal position of the ECHR on the observance of the right to a fair trial of persons suffering from mental disorders (6 decisions were analyzed in which the usions An analysis of the ECHR's key positions led to the conclusion that there was a violation of a person's right to a fair trial in national case law (Article 6 of theConvention), due in part to the lack of clear criteria for legally restricting a person's right to a trial.
Conclusions An analysis of the ECHR's key positions led to the conclusion that there was a violation of a person's right to a fair trial in national case law (Article 6 of theConvention), due in part to the lack of clear criteria for legally restricting a person's right to a trial.
The aim Medicrime Convention is a first international treaty against counterfeit medical products and similar crimes involving threats to public health. There are problems in criminalization of those acts that are listed in Art. 8 of the Medicrime Convention because the term of "similar crimes" is absent in the current criminal legislation of Ukraine.

Materials and methods The conducted study is based on the analysis of the provisions of the Medicrime Convention, the criminal legislation of Ukraine. The following methods dialectical method; hermeneutic method; system-and-structural method; comparative-and-law method were used.

Results Comparison of the provisions of the Medicrime Convention allows to state that crimes in its Articles 5-8 that are different from those provided for in Art. 5-7 of this Convention and form independent types of actions, are at least "placing on the market" of medicinal products and medical devices provided in subparagraph "a" of paragraph 1 of Art. 8 and "commercial use of o well as special kinds of some of them. These types of crimes are not the same (identical).
Conclusions The term of "similar crimes" in Art. 8 of the Medicrime Convention covers multi-ordinal intentional acts that constitute different types of independent crimes involving threats to public health, as well as special kinds of some of them. These types of crimes are not the same (identical).
The aim Determining the need to differentiate the criminal liability of medical workers for damage caused in the course of professional activity.

Materials and methods This following research is based on an analysis of laws (21 laws), court judgments and case files (108 judgments and 8 case files), judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (4) and the legal doctrine of criminal law. Comparative, systematic, analytic, and empiric methods have been used in this research. During the preparation of this article the results of personal experience of the scientific work (17 years), the experience of advocacy (11 years), and the experience of the Supreme Court's judge have been applied.

Results The analysis of case files, thoughts of scientists and lawyers-practitioners allowed to propose criteria and indicators influencing increasing or decreasing of social dangerousness of actions committed by medical professionals. It is noted that the necessity of the legislator to consider the close interrelation of professional medical services and influence on the health of persons who demand medical services or need health care during differentiation of criminal liability.

Conclusions The necessity of differentiating approach to the criminal liability of medical professionals who inflict health damages or death is stated in comparison with the liability of general subjects of a crime.
Conclusions The necessity of differentiating approach to the criminal liability of medical professionals who inflict health damages or death is stated in comparison with the liability of general subjects of a crime.
The aim of the research is to identify specific of AI in healthcare, its nature, and specifics and to establish complexities of AI implementation in healthcare and to propose ways to eliminate them.

Materials and methods This study was conducted during June-October of 2020. learn more Through a broad literature review, analysis of EU, USA regulation acts, scientific researches and opinions of progressive-minded people in this sphere this paper provide a guide to understanding the essence of AI in healthcare and specifics of its regulation. It is based on dialectical, comparative, analytic, synthetic and comprehensive methods.

Results One of the first broad definitions of AI sounded like "Artificial Intelligence is the study of ideas which enable computers to do the things that make people seem intelligent ... The central goals of Artificial Intelligence are to make computers more useful and to understand the principles which make intelligence possible." There are two approaches to name this technology - "Artificialving, and uncovering new areas of its use, but rather on the legal framework that is clearly lacking appropriate regulations and some political, ethical, and financial transformations. Thus, the core questions regarding is this technology by its nature is suitable for healthcare at all? Is the current legislative framework looking appropriate to regulate AI in terms of safety, efficiency, premarket, and postmarked monitoring? How the model of liability with connection to AI technology using in healthcare should be constructed? How to ensure privacy without the restriction of AI technology use? Should intellectual privacy rights prevail over public health concerns? Many questions to address in order to move in line with technology development and to get the benefits of its practical implementation.
My Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gsk2193874.html