Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
CAclassNet cross-validation resulted with train error mean ± sd of 2.001% ± 0.96%, validation error of 4.5% ± 2.26%, and net accuracy of 95.49% ± 2.26%. Network test error resulted in a mean ± sd values of 10.73% ± 0.76%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy evaluated on the test dataset were respectively for AL-CA sub-type 1, 0.912, 0.936; for ATTR-CA 0.935, 0.897, 0.972; for control subjects 0.809, 0.971, 0.909. In conclusion, the proposed CAclassNet model seems very promising as an aid for the clinician in the diagnosis of CA from cardiac [18F]-Florbetaben PET images acquired a few minutes after the injection.We aimed to assess a possible difference of the neointimal coverage status and its quality after implantation of the current-generation metallic stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) vs. stable coronary lesions (non-ACS). We comprehensively analyzed three prospective single-center observational studies RESTORE (UMIN000033009), HEAL-BioFreedom (UMIN000029692), and HEAL-BioFreedom ACS (UMIN000034769). All patients who received successful optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination at planned 3-month follow-up after stent implantation were analyzed. Study population was divided into two groups, ACS vs. non-ACS groups. We evaluated standard OCT variables, coverage percent, and the quantitative light property values including light intensity, attenuation, and backscatter of neointima. A total of 177 lesions from 154 patients (ACS 44 lesions vs. non-ACS 133 lesions) were analyzed. At 3-month follow-up, coverage percent (ACS 91.5 ± 9.5% vs. non-ACS 91.8 ± 9.0%, P = 0.722) and neointimal thickness (ACS 59.5 ± 32.3 µm vs. non-ACS 58.2 ± 32.3 µm, P = 0.760) did not significantly differ. Light property values were similar between both groups (light intensity 159.29 ± 72.20 vs. 159.45 ± 63.78, P = 0.654; light attenuation 0.88 ± 0.26 vs. 0.87 ± 0.24 m-1, P = 0.988; backscatter 4.86 ± 0.58 vs. 4.83 ± 0.57, P = 0.812). The similarity of the neointimal quality in ACS and non-ACS patients was consistent across the 6 different types of current-generation metallic stents (P for interaction > 0.05). Our findings suggested the comparable neointimal characteristics 3 months after implantation of the current-generation metallic stents in patients with ACS and stable coronary lesions by quantitative OCT methodology.Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery is a major health problem that is associated with a significant financial burden and increased early morbidity and mortality. We investigated the accuracy of new echocardiographic derived indices to predict patients at higher risk of developing POAF. 84 consecutive patients (age 57.9 ± 6.9, 32% female) hospitalized for isolated CABG underwent comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation before surgery. Left atrial (LA) function was quantified through the assessment of phasic LA volumes to calculate LATEF. Speckle tracking echocardiography STE was used to measure LA reservoir strain, conduit strain and booster strain. learn more Patients who developed POAF had increased LA volumes and impaired LA functions assessed by both the volumetric phasic changes and STE. By univariable analysis, all LA function parameters significantly predicted POAF. Multivariate regression analysis showed that age (P = 0.03, OR 1.134, 95% CI 1.012-1.271) and LATEF (P = 0.001, OR 0.814, 95% CI 0.725-0.914) were strong independent factors for POAF with LATEF showing the highest predictive accuracy. After multivariable adjustment to include LA strain indices to the base model, LA contractile strain LACtS (23.93 ± 4.19 vs 37.0 ± 3.35, p less then 0.001) was the best discriminated for the highest predictive accuracy (OR 0.429, 95% CI 0.26-0.708). The ROC Curve was calculated for the greatest performance for prediction of POAF (AUC LACtS 0.992; LATEF 0.899). Adding new left atrial mechanics parameters is a more sensitive, independent tool that provides an incremental predictive value to discriminate patients at more risk for POAF.Flooding stress nowadays is one of the major stressors for plants under climate change. This kind of stress may cause severe depression of the plant's growth through inhibition of photosynthesis and oxidative cell damage as well as changes in cell respiration. The present work aimed to study the effect of flooding stress on oxidative and antioxidative parameters in leaves of two maize hybrids (ZP 555 and ZP 606). Leaves of maize plants at the stage of three fully developed leaves were harvested after 6, 24, 72, and 144 h of applied flooding stress. Leaves were used for determination of physiological (the content of photosynthetic pigments and soluble proteins), oxidative stress parameters (the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) and H2O2) as well as antioxidants (the total polyphenols content, and activity of antioxidative enzymes [catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6), superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1), and Class III peroxidases (POX, EC, 1.11.1.7)]). Results indicated that flooding stress-induced time-dependent changes of measured parameters and those hybrids differ in response to stress. The noticeable difference between hybrids was detected in the H2O2 and MDA content. An increase in the activity of SOD, POX and polyphenols content, with the most pronounced changes in POX activity and polyphenols concentration, could minimize the cellular damage caused by flooding. The results of the present study suggest that a more robust antioxidative metabolism is essential under flooding stress and could be a protective strategy against oxidative damage induced by flooding in ZP 606 maize plants compared to ZP 555 plants.
To assess the 12-month efficacy and safety of fixed-combination brimonidine tartrate 0.2%/timolol maleate 0.5% (FCBT) with or without bimatoprost 0.01% (BIM) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), including normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).
Prospective, multicenter, open-label study.
FCBT was self-administered twice daily after applicable washout (study eye). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. BIM could be added for IOP ≥ 21mmHg, IOP reduction from baseline < 20%, or the investigator deemed it necessary. Primary endpoint mean (11-a.m.) month-12 IOP change from baseline. Secondary endpoints included mean IOP changes from baseline at other visits, median time to achieving and patients (%) achieving target IOP reduction with FCBT, and visual field (VF) progression rate over 12months. Safety was assessed at each visit.
Of 118 eyes with POAG (NTG, n = 93), 87 used FCBT; 31 required FCBT + BIM. Mean IOP changes from baseline (16.8 and 15.3mmHg) to month 12 were - 4.
Read More: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/disodium-Cromoglycate.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team