Notes

7 Small Changes You Can Make That'll Make A Big Difference With Your Asbestos Litigation
New York Asbestos Litigation

New York City ranked second in mesothelioma-specific case filings nationwide in 2019. Mesothelioma is an asbestos-related disease that is serious and has prolonged latency.

Recent NYCAL decisions will have a profound effect on the defense of asbestos lawsuits. These decisions are likely to result in a significant number of summary judgment motions based on defendant's fiber/cc tests and expert reports that place any exposure that can be deemed respirable below an ambient exposure threshold.

Expert Testimony

New York asbestos attorneys rely heavily on the testimony of expert witnesses to prove their clients' claims. Expert witness fees can make up a a large percentage of the total costs in asbestos litigation. Both sides can devote hundreds of hours in preparation to question an expert. Experts can charge thousands of dollar per day. For this reason, it is essential for litigants to examine and verify potential experts prior to hiring them. If they don't, it could result in a failed Daubert Challenge or losing cases.

New York has had a long industrial history. Many workers were exposed to asbestos. Many of these workers have suffered asbestos-related illnesses, such as mesothelioma and cancer of the lung. Anyone who has suffered from these conditions are entitled to compensation from companies who exposed them to asbestos.

Asbestos lawsuits are a regular occurrence in New York, and judges are aware of the issues involved. For instance, courts expedite trials for terminally sick plaintiffs, and they often consolidate cases to reduce trial expenses. Additionally, courts regularly review their discovery procedures to ensure they are up-to-date and efficient.

In a landmark case, Brown v. Weitz & Luxenberg the First Department held conclusory cumulative-exposure statements by plaintiffs’ experts did not prove the causality. The defendants appealed the case and a decision is expected soon.

The court's decision is likely to have a profound impact on asbestos litigation in New York. At present, mesothelioma lawyer firms pepper daytime TV with commercials urging victims to file asbestos lawsuits, promising huge settlements. The specialized litigation has been particularly lucrative for plaintiffs' lawyers, who have paid millions of dollars in referral fees to former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, who was recently found guilty of federal corruption charges related to the millions of dollars he earned from directing asbestos cases to his firm.

In addition to these legal developments, New Yorkers need to remain alert to asbestos exposure at work and in their communities. Asbestos-related lawsuits are on the rise, and New York is among the most sought-after jurisdictions for mesothelioma verdicts.

Summary Judgment

A New York asbestos lawyer can help you obtain the compensation you're entitled to.

Asbestos exposure could lead to serious illnesses like mesothelioma and lung cancer. These diseases are extremely serious and have a long time to develop. This means that victims might not be suffering from symptoms until 20 or 25 years following their first exposure. There are steps workers can take to avoid asbestos exposure and a subsequent disease. A number of major changes have taken place in the asbestos litigation scene in recent years. In 2015, the political establishment in New York was shook to its core by the conviction of Sheldon Silver on federal corruption charges. Silver's corruption convictions stemmed from his secretly working at the law firm of Weitz & Luxenberg, which employed him to earn millions of dollars in referral fees for the firm.

The new Albany landscape has also been shattered by the courtroom political machinations of the NYCAL docket. Justice Sherry Klein Heitler was removed as the long-time director of NYCAL docket in 2021 amid reports that she had given the "red carpet treatment" to asbestos-related claims filed by Weitz & Luxenberg. Justice Peter Moulton took over NYCAL in the wake of this shake-up. His decisions have placed a heavy burden on defendants, making it virtually impossible for them to obtain summary judgment.

In Juni the year 2003, the Court of Appeals dealt NYCAL a harsh dose of reality, renouncing the cumulative-exposure theory that had become fashionable in the litigation, and requiring plaintiffs to prove specific causation through sufficient scientific expression by their experts. This decision gives New York asbestos attorneys a strong argument against claims that claim to be fraud or speculative.

In Reid v Abex the Court of Appeals supported asbestos defense lawyers in their efforts to compel plaintiffs to prove a causal connection between asbestos-related illnesses and the products to which they were exposed. In this case, plaintiffs are required to prove that their asbestos-related disease was caused by specific friction materials or linings provided by the defendant rather than general exposure to asbestos in the workplace.

Causation

The defendants must demonstrate that asbestos caused the disease. It is generally accepted that exposure to asbestos-containing materials is a cause of mesothelioma and other diseases, however, the law requires plaintiffs to establish the specific exposure to products produced by specific defendants in order to be successful in their claims.

This is a tough standard to achieve, particularly in NYCAL, where a single judge manages the entire NYC asbestos litigation. In the 16 years since Parker, New York courts have been unable to apply the principles outlined in the case. In 2016, the First Department in Matter of NYC Asbestos Litigation, (Juni) ruling that an expert's evidence that plaintiff "regularly" exposed himself to products for friction that contained asbestos was not enough to satisfy the requirements of causality specific to Nemeth.

Juni has placed a significant burden on defendants in NYCAL and may oblige them to settle their claims at a lower amount than they are entitled to. A mesothelioma attorney in NYC can explain the advantages of filing a suit and the options for restitution in the event that you are diagnosed with mesothelioma or any other asbestos-related diseases.

New York State was the second-most popular jurisdiction for mesothelioma suits in the year 2019. It handled 6percent of all asbestos litigation in the nation. Up to 13,000 people have been diagnosed with the disease in New York. The majority of patients were workers or contractors exposed to asbestos in industrial applications.

Anaheim asbestos lawyer You Tube of mesothelioma generally don't manifest until between 25 to 50 after the initial exposure. Many asbestos patients are battling to obtain the compensation they need to cover medical expenses and lost wages, as well as loss of companionship and other losses.

It is essential to file your mesothelioma claim in a timely manner however, it is essential to work with mesothelioma lawyers who can help you seek the highest amount of financial compensation. Call a mesothelioma attorney in NYC to set up a no-cost appointment, no-obligation. Your attorney can discuss your rights to financial compensation from an asbestos trust fund.

Damages

If you're suffering from mesothelioma or a similar asbestos-related condition A successful lawsuit could compensate your family's losses. Compensation may cover medical bills as well as lost wages due to inability to work, home care expenses, mental stress and suffering, loss of quality funeral and burial costs, and other costs. A seasoned New York mesothelioma attorney will look into the parties at fault and gather evidence to back your claims. Your lawyer can then bring a civil suit before the statute of limitations expires in your state.

The courts are familiar with asbestos lawsuits and have specialized dockets to help streamline the process. They accelerate trials for plaintiffs with terminal illnesses and also group similar cases together. In addition the judges who decide these cases are aware of the heightened dangers associated with asbestos exposure and are trained to ensure that justice is done.


According to a research study conducted recently, New York City is the main hub in the country for asbestos litigation. Asbestos victims have received billions of dollars in settlements and verdicts. Mesothelioma, a deadly cancer is caused by asbestos fibers. It is a rare, incurable illness, but lawsuits brought against companies who exposed workers to the cancer-causing substance have aided in compensating victims for their suffering.

In addition to compensating the victims of mesothelioma and the other asbestos-related illnesses, these lawsuits are aimed at punishing corporate wrongdoers. These lawsuits seek punitive damage awards that are in addition to compensatory damages. They are designed to discourage the defendant's behavior in the future and deter others from taking part in the same course of action.

However the NYCAL decision provides defendants with a glimmer of hope in their struggle to stay out of punitive damages. Previously, they had faced the possibility of huge judgments in these cases, with the prevailing theory that their conduct was so indefensible that they must pay punitive damages to deter others from committing the same crime.

Now, with the ruling in favor of plaintiffs, firms named as defendants in NYCAL cases could be dismissed in a substantial proportion of their cases. This is because even if they get dismissed, they will still be required to pay legal fees to defend a case that they did not deserve to be involved in.

Here's my website: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hEca286-c8