Notes
Notes - notes.io |
9-10.6) occurred in bed 13, while in bed 7 the count of adverse events was 398 in 4211 admissions (9.4%, 95% CI 8.6-10.4) (p-value=0.6). Odds Ratio for mortality was equal to 0.9 (95% CI 0.8-1.1) and suffering adverse events when admitted to bed 13 versus bed 7 was 1.03 (95% CI 0.9-1.2). CONCLUSIONS Bed 13 is not a risk factor for patient safety. Hospitals should pay attention to causes and interventions to avoid adverse events based on evidence rather than beliefs or myths. OBJECTIVE To analyse the frequency of complaints due to the refusal of Primary Care Physicians to indicate a diagnostic test, treatment, or referral requested by a patient. METHODS Observational, retrospective study was conducted by analysing the complaints filed in a Primary Care Area during the years 2016, 2017, and 2018. RESULTS A total of 378 complaints were included. Of these, 30 (8%) were justified in the refusal by the doctors to a request of the patient (28 addressed to general practitioners and 2 to paediatricians). The most frequent related to the request was for a treatment (18 [60%]) followed by the request for diagnostic tests (9 [30%]). While the total number of claims increased by 151%, the relative weight of the claims for not responding to a patient's request was reduced (2016, 8/70, 11.4%; 2017, 11/132, 8.3%; and 2018, 11/176, 6.3%). No professional liability claims were filed. CONCLUSIONS Complaints for rejecting patient requests increased slightly, but tends to decrease their relative weight when considering the volume of complaints. L.U.OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of establishing a mechanical thrombectomy (MT) program for acute ischemic stroke in a community hospital using interventional cardiologists working closely with neurologists. BACKGROUND American Heart Association/American Stroke Association 2018 guidelines give a Class I (Level of Evidence A) recommendation for MT in eligible patients with large vessel occlusion stroke. Improvement in neurological outcomes with MT is highly time sensitive. Most hospitals do not have trained neurointerventionalists to perform MT, leading to treatment delays that reduce the benefit of reperfusion therapy. METHODS An MT program based in the cardiac catheterization laboratory was developed using interventional cardiologists with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction teams. RESULTS Forty patients underwent attempted MT for acute ischemic stroke. An additional 5 patients who underwent angiography did not undergo attempted thrombectomy, because of absence of target thrombus (n = 4) or unsuitable anatomy (n = 1). Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score prior to MT was 19 and at discharge was 7. Tretinoin agonist TICI (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction) grade 2b or 3 flow was restored in 80% of patients (32 of 40). At 90 days, 55% of patients (22 of 40) were functionally independent (modified Rankin score ≤2). In-hospital mortality was 13% (5 of 40). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 15% of patients (6 of 40). Major vascular complications occurred in 5% of patients (2 of 40). CONCLUSIONS MT can be successfully performed by interventional cardiologists with carotid stenting experience working closely with neurologists in hospitals lacking formally trained neurointerventionists. This model has the potential to increase access to timely care for patients with acute ischemic stroke. OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the feasibility of complete cerebral protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a novel embolic protection device. BACKGROUND Evidences and data about new cerebral embolic protection devices are lacking and scarce. METHODS A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, first-in-man pilot study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cerebral embolic protection utilizing the Emblok embolic protection system (Innovative Cardiovascular Solutions, Grand Rapids, Michigan) during TAVR. The Emblok is a transfemoral aortic filter that provide full coverage of the epiaortic vessels. Brain diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed at baseline and 2 to 5 days after TAVR. Primary endpoints were technical success and immediate cerebral embolic burden after TAVR, defined as number and volume of new brain lesions detected with DW-MRI at days 2 to 5 post-TAVR compared with baseline. RESULTS A total of 20 subjects were enrolled. The Emblok system was successfully positioned in all the cases. At 30-day follow-up, no major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events occurred. Nineteen (95%) patients had new ischemic defects at post-procedural DW-MRI. The median number of new lesions per patient was 10.00 (interquartile range [IQR] 4.75 to 15.25). The total new lesion volume was 199.9 mm3 (IQR 83.9 to 447.5 mm3) and the mean lesion volume per lesion was 42.5 mm3 (IQR 21.5 to 75.6 mm3). Histopathologic analysis showed evidence of significant debris in 18 (90%) filters. CONCLUSIONS The Emblok embolic protection system appears to be feasible and safe during TAVR. The device was successfully placed and retrieved in all cases and no neurological events were observed. Cerebral total new lesion volume was similar to other trials on cerebral protection during TAVR, thus warranting a larger study. (European Study Evaluating the Emblok Embolic Protection System During TAVR; NCT03130491). OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate institutional variability in high radiation doses during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND It is unknown whether radiation safety practices are optimally applied across institutions performing PCI. METHODS Using data from a large statewide registry, PCI discharges between July 1, 2016, and March 31, 2018, with a procedural air kerma (AK) recorded were analyzed. PCI procedures were grouped by the performing hospital, and institutional frequency of procedural AK ≥5 Gy was calculated. Fitted hierarchical Bayesian modeling was performed to identify variables independently associated with an AK ≥5 Gy. The performing hospital was included as a random effect in the hierarchical model. RESULTS Among 36,201 PCI procedures at 28 hospitals, procedural AK was ≥5 Gy in 1,477 cases (4.1%), ≥10 Gy in 185 (0.5%), and ≥15 Gy in 105 (0.3%). The institutional frequency of procedural AK ≥5 Gy ranged from 0.0% to 10.9%. Bayesian modeling identified body mass index, dyslipidemia, diabetes, prior coronary bypass surgery, use of mechanical circulatory support, and the performing hospital as independent predictors of an AK ≥5 Gy.
My Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Tretinoin(Aberela).html
|
Notes.io is a web-based application for taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000 notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 12 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team