Notesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb108/eb108e1225c6a34726896a3a71243e18df6f7721" alt="what is notes.io? What is notes.io?"
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
Forty-six pregnancies ended with premature delivery (16%). Delivery mode was by C-section for 108 patients (62%) and vaginal delivery for 104 (36%). Twenty complications were reported during delivery (mainly urological), of which 19 occurred during C-section. Nine women experienced postpartum urinary incontinence (4%); in 5 of then this was due to urinary fistulae secondary to complicated C-section.
Pregnancy and vaginal delivery are possible for women with LUTR who have no obstetric or medical contraindications, except for some particular cases of bladder exstrophy. However, these high-risk pregnancies and deliveries should be managed by a specialist multidisciplinary team.
Pregnancy and vaginal delivery are possible for women with LUTR who have no obstetric or medical contraindications, except for some particular cases of bladder exstrophy. However, these high-risk pregnancies and deliveries should be managed by a specialist multidisciplinary team.
Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSH), sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and ventral rectopexy (LVR) with mesh are advocated for surgical treatment of pelvic and rectal prolapse. Our study aims at showing the feasibility of concomitant laparoscopic prolapse repair by comparing perioperative and long-term outcomes of LSH or LSC with and without LVR.
This is a retrospective study carried out on 348 women operated on between July 2009 and July 2019. Patients were divided into four groups (1) LSH only, (2) LSC only, (3) LSH + LVR and (4) LSC + LVR. POP-Q scores and satisfaction questionnaires were recorded at baseline and then annually. Outcomes were defined as subjective failure (vaginal/rectal prolapse symptoms), objective failure (prolapse to/beyond the hymen, full thickness rectal prolapse) or retreatment for prolapse. Complications were collected and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Three hundred forty-eight women underwent laparoscopic repair for pelvic and rectal prolapse (219, 44, 66 and 19 in group 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively). Median follow-up was 24 (4-174)months. Success rate for both rectal and pelvic prolapse was 90.2%. Recurrence rates were not significantly different between the groups (12.3%, 6.8%, 9.1% and 10.5% for groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively). Significant improvement was noticed in satisfaction questionnaires in all groups. There was no difference in perioperative and late complications.
The combined laparoscopic procedure appears to be safe and efficient in treating pelvic and rectal prolapse. Appropriate patient selection and available surgical expertise should determine whether to perform these procedures combined or separately.
The combined laparoscopic procedure appears to be safe and efficient in treating pelvic and rectal prolapse. Appropriate patient selection and available surgical expertise should determine whether to perform these procedures combined or separately.
Endoscopic ear surgery (EES) is increasingly used internationally instead of microscopic ear surgery (MES), but has not yet become established as aroutine procedure everywhere in Germany.
The incision-suture time and practicability of EES in the setting of aGerman clinic were investigated.
In aretrospective study, 60consecutive MES patients from 2015 were compared with 60consecutive EES patients from 2018. Hearing results, tympanic membrane findings after 3weeks, and incision-suture times were compared.
In EES, access was mostly transmeatal and bone of the anterior auditory canal wall had to be removed less often than in MES. There was no statistically significant difference in surgery times between the two groups. Perforation closure was achieved in 57/60 and 59/60ears in the MES and EES groups, respectively. Hearing was improved in both groups. ABT-199 There was no statistical difference in hearing improvement between the two groups.
EES is atime efficient and minimally invasive method which represents aviable alternative to MES with comparable results.
EES is a time efficient and minimally invasive method which represents a viable alternative to MES with comparable results.Neurological and neurophysiological knowledge of neuromuscular diseases is combined in neurolaryngology with experience from laryngology. Laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) is the most important diagnostic and prognostic tool in neurolaryngology. It can be combined with diagnostic electrostimulation. Interest in LEMG today extends beyond the thyroarytenoid muscle to all accessible laryngeal muscles. LEMG should be performed and interpreted according to a standardized protocol. Main applications of LEMG are confirmation, topodiagnostic and prognostic assessment of vocal fold paralysis. It is possible to differentiate fresh from old recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions as well as mechanical vocal fold fixations from paralysis. Needle guidance for botulinum toxin injections in spasmodic dysphonia and for augmentation laryngoplasty can be supported by LEMG, but also by laryngeal ultrasound. The timing of therapy for temporary and permanent augmentations, thyroplasty and reinnervation surgery may be better defined with experience from neurolaryngology. The use of diagnostic neurostimulation can reveal any remaining active movement potential of a vocal fold and thus help identify candidates for future laryngeal pacemaker treatments. Other topics in neurolaryngology include spasmodic dysphonia and underlying neurological diseases such as stroke, central vocal fold paralysis, essential tremor and Parkinson's disease. Laryngoscopic, clinical and LEMG characteristics of these diseases are presented.
Perpendicular vascular changes (PVC) are markers of tumor-induced neoangiogenesis at the vocal folds. Contact endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (CE-NBI) allows adetailed analysis of such vascular changes.
This work intends to evaluate the potential of CE-NBI for diagnosis of benign, dysplastic, and malignant lesions of the vocal folds. In addition, it should be determined whether CE-NBI offers an additional benefit in detecting PVC compared to white-light endoscopy (WLE) and NBI alone.
Three examiners evaluated histologically verified cases of benign, dysplastic, and malignant lesions of the larynx in WLE, NBI, and CE-NBI (n = 60). In each mode, they examined the lesion for PVC and assessed the lesion's dignity. The proportion of lesions with detected PVC, the statistical measures of performance in detecting high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma, and the interrater variability for each mode were calculated.
CE-NBI proved superior to the other investigated diagnostic methods in terms of detecting PVC and in terms of sensitivity and accuracy in the diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma.
My Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/abt-199.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team