Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
03). Chondral damage was also more commonly seen in group A [26/49] as compared to group B (5/23; p = 0.01). At one-year follow-up, 65% of the athletes from group B returned to sports as compared to 57% of the athletes from group A (p-value = 0.6). WOMAC score in group A and B was 95.5 ± 4.88 and 96 ± 4.39 respectively (p = 0.67). Lysholm score in group A and B was 1.02 ± 1.7 and 0.96 ± 1.2 respectively (p = 0.88). Conclusion Non-contact mode of injury was associated with a higher incidence of meniscal tear and chondral damage. However, the mode of injury does not affect the functional outcome of ACL reconstruction surgery.Objectives Partial ACL tears are increasingly recognized in young active patients. They can evolve into complete tears. Controversy exists regarding the need to spare intact ACL bundle as it has its advantages considering biomechanical strength, blood supply and proprioception. The current study determined the challenges in partial ACL tear management and assessed the functional outcomes. Methods Twenty consecutive patients with partial ACL tears were studied. Inclusion criteria were age 16-45yrs and patients operated for partial ACL tear. Exclusion criteria were combined ACL-PCL injuries, associated collateral injuries, complete ACL tear, chondral defect or bony malalignment and patients with radiographic signs of arthritis. 'Partial' tear was defined as continuous fibers from native tibial ACL footprint to native femoral ACL footprint in arthroscopy. Clinical and radiological assessment was done to evaluate anteromedial(AM) or posterolateral(PL) bundle tears. We used the term "ACL-augmentation" without dist. Around 97.5% of the patients reported outcomes as good and fair. Conclusion The treatment strategy needs to be individualized. The ACL augmentation needs more systematic and accurate placement of portals while sparing the intact ACL fibers. For AM bundle, tibial tunnel entry point is about 1-2 cm medial to tibial tuberosity. For PL bundle, it is about 3-4 cm medial to tibial tuberosity to protect the AM bundle. Long term studies with greater number of subjects are required.Background Peroneus longus tendon autograft resembles hamstring tendon's biomechanical strength. Compound C supplier Thus, peroneus longus is a potential graft in reconstructive orthopaedic procedures. However, there was few study in evaluation of peroneus longus usage in ACL reconstruction. This study aimed to quantify the clinical outcome and donor site morbidity in ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon autograft. Methods Patients who suffered isolated ACL injury were enrolled and underwent isolated single bundle ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus autograft. Functional score (IKDC, Modified Cincinnati, and Tegner-Lysholm score) were assessed at pre-operative and 2-years after surgery. Graft diameter was measured intraoperative. Donor site morbidities were assessed with thigh circumference measurement and ankle scoring using AOFAS and FADI. We also measured serial hop test. Results Seventy-five patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. Peroneus longus graft diameter was 8.38 ± 0.68 mm. There was significant difference between pre and 2-years post-operative functional score in IKDC, Modified Cincinnati, and Tegner-Lysholm score. Mean of AOFAS was 98.93 ± 3.10 and FADI was 99.79 ± 0.59 with no significant decrease of thigh circumference, and good serial hop test result. Conclusion ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft has excellent functional score in IKDC, Modified Cincinnati, Tegner-Lysholm score at 2-years follow up with the advantages of greater graft diameter, less thigh hypotrophy, good serial hop test result, and excellent ankle function based on AOFAS and FADI score. Level of evidence Level 2, Prospective Cohort Study.We present early clinical outcomes of patients following anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a TransLateral, single bundle, all-inside technique with a one-year follow-up and radiological evaluation of socket position. Eligible Patients who underwent a primary ACL reconstruction, using the TransLateral, all-inside technique alone, between Jan 2013 and Feb 2016 were included in this study. Of this group, all patients underwent isolated semitendinosus graft harvest. The Lysholm knee scores were measured preoperatively and at one-year follow-up in 40 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Postoperatively, antero-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained to evaluate the position of the femoral socket (using the Bernard and Hertel Grid) and tibial socket (using the Amis-Jakob line). There were 36 males and 4 females with a mean age of 27.1 years (range 16-49). There was a single non-surgical related mortality prior to the one year follow up. We report no postoperative infections or graft failure at one year. The mean preoperative Lysholm score was 68.7 (Range 29-95). The mean Lysholm score increased to 92.5% (Range 59-100, p less then 0.05). Evaluation of femoral sockets revealed accurate positioning on the Bernard and Hertel Grid with a mean ACL center of 27% along Blumensaat's line and 34% of the height of the intercondylar notch. The mean tibial socket position was 41.8% (Range 32%-47%) along the Amis-Jakob Line. Our single surgeon case series utilizing the all-inside, TransLateral ACLR technique highlights good early outcomes with no postoperative complications or graft failure at one year.Background Nowadays, patients widely accept anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery. However, its long-term complications are still under investigation in athletes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate long-term ACL reconstruction especially in athletes. Methods A total of 426 patients with ACL injury were studied during 2008-2012. Demographic characteristics (gender, age, BMI), graft type, chondral lesion, osteoarthritis, meniscus tear, exercise activity, and pain intensity were noted. The effects of these factors on the return to sport activity after ACL reconstruction were also investigated. Lachman test, KT-1000, ACL quality of life (ACL-QOL), KOOS score, IKDC, and LKS were assessed at 2 years post-operation and at final follow-up. Repeated ACL rupture on the same and contralateral sides were also evaluated.Results knee stability (based on Lachman and KT-1000), knee function (according to KOOS, LKS, and IKDC scores) and ACL-QOL were improved during the 2 years follow-up. The rate of return to sport activity similar to preinjury in patients was 64.
Here's my website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/dorsomorphin-2hcl.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team