Notes

The latest advancements within chitosan-based layer-by-layer biomaterials as well as their biomedical programs.
Gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota maintains a symbiotic relationship with the host and plays a key role in modulating many important biological processes and functions of the host, such as metabolism, inflammation, immune and stress response. Leukadherin-1 It is becoming increasingly apparent that GI microbiota is susceptible to a wide range of environmental factors and insults, for examples, geographic location of birth, diet, use of antibiotics, and exposure to radiation. Alterations in GI microbiota link to various diseases, including radiation-induced disorders. In addition, GI microbiota composition could be used as a biomarker to estimate radiosusceptibility and radiation health risk in the host. In this minireview, we summarized the documented studies on radiation-induced alterations in GI microbiota and the relationship between GI microbiota and radiosusceptibility of the host, and mainly discussed the possible mechanisms underlying GI microbiota influencing the outcome of radiation response in humans and animal models. Furthermore, we proposed that GI microbiota manipulation may be used to reduce radiation injury and improve the health of the host.About 50% of patients diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction have multivessel disease on coronary angiography. Recent evidence has shown that a staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy of non-culprit lesions, achieving complete revascularization, significantly reduces the rate of recurrent cardiovascular events compared with a PCI strategy limited to culprit lesion. Although functional evaluation of intermediate coronary stenoses by functional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is widely used to detect residual myocardial ischaemia, the reliability of the study of non-culprit lesions in the acute phase of heart attack is controversial. On the other hand, the excess of new events in patients with acute coronary syndrome in whom PCI was deferred on the basis of FFR/iFR compared to patients with stable CAD could be due to both an inadequate functional evaluation and an intrinsic higher risk, related to the presence of untreated vulnerable plaques. In this context, intra-coronary imaging has shown that the presence of vulnerability features in non-culprit plaques is associated with an increased rate of ischaemic recurrence.Coexistence of atrial fibrillation and ischaemic heart disease is very common and patients affected by these conditions are exposed to both a high ischaemic and haemorrhagic risk. The choice of an appropriate combination of anticoagulant therapy with single or dual antiplatelet treatment is indeed one of the most relevant and contemporary challenges in clinical practice. Several studies and meta-analyses pointed out that 1 year after an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous revascularization, the use of the sole anticoagulant therapy is not associated with increased risk of major cardiovascular events, whereas there is a substantial reduction of clinical significant bleeding events, as compared to patients treated also with antiplatelet medications. However, there are no clear-cut data regarding the possibility to implement this strategy in each patient, regardless the cardiovascular risk class. Furthermore, for patients requiring a combined anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatment, the available data seem to favour an association of direct anticoagulant and inhibitors of P2Y12, rather than regimens including aspirin. These data are derived mainly from observational studies, with all their limitations. The use of aspirin could be beneficial in patients with significant comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, or with severe peripheral atherosclerotic disease, involving the carotids and other large arteries.Initial studies on renal denervation (RDN) for the treatment of non-controlled arterial hypertension (HTN) through radiofrequency ablation of renal arteries demonstrated that RDN is an effective therapeutic strategy to reduce arterial blood pressure (BP). Nonetheless, the first randomized study, SYMPLICITY-HTN-3, failed to demonstrate a clear benefit for RND over the control group. Technologic evolution, with the introduction of new second generation multi-electrode devices, allowed deep energy delivery along the full circumference of the vessel. Two recent randomized studies involving patients assuming (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED) or not (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED) antihypertensive pharmacologic treatment, demonstrated the efficacy and safety of RDN using second generation systems for radiofrequency ablation. Another recent randomized study demonstrated that RDN with ultrasounds (RADIANCE-HTN SOLO) of the main renal arteries led to a significant BP reduction compared to the control group. These studies have once again raised the interest of the scientific community towards attempting to define the appropriate role of RDN in the treatment of hypertension. Nonetheless, larger and longer clinical trials will be necessary to draw further conclusions.Ischaemic stroke is the second leading cause of mortality and disability in the western world. Revascularization interventions are the cornerstone of the acute treatment of this pathology and must be administered as soon as possible after the patient's arrival. They consist of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase, recommended by the guidelines within 4.5 h of the onset of symptoms, and endovascular treatment, recommended within 6 h of the onset of symptoms. The individualized patient selection based on the extent of the mismatch between the penumbra and the ischaemic core allowed to overcome the limits imposed by the rigid time windows, defining a benefit of mechanical revascularization therapies up to 24 h from the theoretical onset of symptoms (last time the patient was known to be well) and up to 9 h for IVT since the theoretical onset of symptoms (last time the patient was known to be well). Advanced neuroimaging methods with perfusion studies are a fundamental tool in patient selection. Their spread in the territory, together with a greater availability of neurovascular treatment units are desirable to ensure a fair delivery of treatment to all patients with ischaemic stroke.
Homepage: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/leukadherin-1.html