Notes

Asbestos Lawsuit History: It's Not As Expensive As You Think
Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History

Many companies have declared bankruptcy because of the asbestos lawsuits filed by victims. A knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer will assist you in obtaining compensation.

Doctors and health experts long warned about the dangers of asbestos exposure. Industry leaders have downplayed these risks. In time, more and more people became ill with asbestos-related diseases.

The Third Case

Asbestos litigation really took off in the 1970s, shortly after scientific studies began to link asbestos to serious illnesses such as mesothelioma or asbestosis. Tens of thousands of lawsuits were filed because asbestos-related diseases rarely manifest for years after exposure. These lawsuits were filed in Texas due to its favorable laws.

One of the most significant cases that shaped asbestos litigation involved Johns Manville, the leading producer of asbestos-related products during the 1940s and 1950s. In the 1980s, it was revealed that Lewis Brown, the CEO of the company, placed profits over the health and safety of his employees. Deposition testimony revealed that Brown was heavily influenced by the company's chief medical advisor, Dr. Russell Budd. Budd was a doctor well-known for his sloppy disregard for the health of employees.

Johns Manville was found to have known about asbestos' dangers, but did not take any action to protect their workers. The court ruled that the company is accountable for any damages suffered by workers who later develop mesothelioma or other asbestos-related illnesses. The court also ruled the company liable for damages for the families of deceased employees.

After the decision in Borel many asbestos victims and families sought compensation from the companies that made use of the material. Most of these claims were rejected for a variety reasons. Some cases were permitted to proceed and the courts came up with up a set of guidelines that guide the handling of asbestos-related lawsuits.

In the 1990s asbestos defendants were still seeking legal rulings to limit their liability. For example, they wanted to be able to argue that asbestos materials were not part of their product, and therefore should not be held liable for injuries to people who worked with asbestos. These arguments were rejected and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to recognize the "asbestos product" defense.


State and federal laws protect the right of a mesothelioma patient to seek compensation for their illness from the parties accountable in a specific case. youtube.com continue to fight these claims.

Website: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxDD3nrdWrg