Notesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb108/eb108e1225c6a34726896a3a71243e18df6f7721" alt="what is notes.io? What is notes.io?"
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
Purpose This study aimed to compare reproductive outcomes after Reception of Oocytes from Partner (ROPA; also called reciprocal in vitro fertilization) with those after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) with autologous oocytes, in lesbian couples. Methods This was a retrospective matched cohort study of couples performing a first cycle of either ROPA (n = 60) or autologous IVF/ICSI (n = 120) between February 2012 and May 2018. Couples were matched 12 by age of the oocyte provider, day of embryo transfer (ET), and number of embryos transferred. Pregnancy and live birth rates after the first ET and cumulative results after all subsequent ETs performed until June 2019 were evaluated. Results Reproductive outcomes were significantly better after ROPA at first ET biochemical pregnancy 70.0% versus 47.5% (p = 0.004), clinical pregnancy 60.0% versus 40.0% (p = 0.011), ongoing pregnancy 60.0% versus 36.7% (p = 0.003), and live birth 57.1% versus 29.8% (p = 0.001). After adjusting for age, body mass index, and number of mature oocytes, we still observed a significant improvement across all outcomes in ROPA (live birth rate odds ratio [OR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-6.57). Cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates were also higher after ROPA (live birth 66.1% vs. 43.4% [p = 0.005]). The adjusted analysis result for cumulative live birth was OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.14-5.54. Conclusion When medically indicated, ROPA can potentially improve reproductive outcomes for lesbian couples through the possibility of selecting the best combination between two oocyte providers and two gestational mothers, provided that both women wish to participate in the pregnancy plan.Purpose Through a qualitative systematic literature review (n = 12), this article seeks to better understand how telemedicine is used globally to address mental health needs within rural areas. This article highlights common barriers and advantages to providing this type of care, arguing that telemedicine services may be quite impactful in addressing mental health care needs in rural areas, but barriers, risks, and other cultural considerations must be considered when designing and implementing telemental health intervention programs. Methods A search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, Medline, and SocINDEX. The inclusion criteria (1) studies published between the years 2012 and 2019; (2) studies that met rigorous methodological criteria or analyzed telemedicine programs rigorously with evidence-based approaches; and (3) studies that specifically address or discuss tested telemedicine intervention programs for mental health in rural areas. Twelve articles of the 143 reviewed met the inclusion criteria. Findings Themes included (1) advantages (cost-effectiveness; accessibility, feasibility, and addressing disparities; privacy/confidentiality; integrative/collaborative care with primary care providers); (2) barriers and challenges (digital divides and infrastructure; ongoing care); (3) need for evaluation, evidence-based programs, and sustainability; and (4) across-cultural considerations. Conclusions Future research examining the use of telemedicine in mental health intervention programs for rural areas should focus on various types of rural communities across the globe, diversifying the scope of this type of research and allowing for a better understanding of how to implement programs that address specific needs and barriers unique to rural communities across the globe.Purpose We examined the association of sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE) with past-week depressive symptoms and past 12-month suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among Korean lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. selleck compound Methods A cross-sectional study of 2168 participants was used. Lifetime SOCE was classified as "never experienced," "been advised but not undergone SOCE," and "undergone SOCE." Results Participants who had undergone SOCE showed 1.44- and 2.35-times higher prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts than those without such practices. Significant associations were also observed between having advice on SOCE alone and all mental health indicators. Conclusion Strict legal sanctions that prohibit SOCE are required in Korea.Background There are few studies examining the usage and utility of patient portals among seriously ill and end-of-life populations and their caregivers. Objective The aim of this study was to describe portal user characteristics among patients and their caregivers (proxy login) at two time points (1) the 12 months following an electronic medical record flag for serious illness and (2) during the last 12 months of life. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis of Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) patients with serious illness, as defined by Kaiser Permanente's prognostic algorithm, and their proxy caregivers was performed for the two time periods. Use was characterized as (1) the discrete number of days the portal was used and (2) the number of days that portal features were accessed. Differences in use by user characteristics were assessed. Results Patients flagged for serious illness (N = 6129) were 70.4 ± 14.2 years of age, and used the portal on average 50.4 days. Patients (N = 6517) in the last year of life were 76.7 ± 13.7 years of age and used the portal on average 43 days. Caregiver proxy use of the portal was low in both cohorts. Patients who were older, female, non-White, and healthier were less likely to use the portal. Conclusions In comparison with overall KPCO portal use and recent patient portal studies examining use patterns, patient portal use was high among patients flagged with serious illness and nearing the end of life. However, because use was associated with age, gender, and race, addressing barriers to portal adoption among underserved populations and caregiver proxies is key to better leveraging patient portal systems for palliative and end-of-life care.Introduction Cannabis plant uses are widespread across human cultures. The current tendency is to classify Cannabis varieties into chemovars upon their chemical fingerprint, mainly cannabinoids and terpenoids content. The identification of chemovars has important medical implications; however, their pharmacological characterization is costly and time consuming. The goal of this study was to assess whether achene shape variation could be related to Cannabis varieties with contrasting cannabinoid concentrations, as a first approach to chemovar identification. Methods We used two-dimensional geometric morphometrics (GM) of the achenes and multivariate statistical analysis. We used achenes from five varieties, two from Type II chemotype (expressing both tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] and cannabidiol [CBD]), two Type I (THC-only), and one Type III (CBD-only). Results The achenes from the different chemotypes were clearly distinguishable. No significant differences between varieties from the same chemotype were observed.
Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ms-275.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team