Notes
Notes - notes.io |
l complexes and by shifting bacterial community composition, and that these changes can be inferred through changes in the FR traits.Biological stability is an essential parameter for assessing the environmental impact from the land application of digestate as organic amendment. In this paper, a new indicator, biological denitrification potential (BDP), was developed for evaluating the biological stability of digestate. Digestate samples collected along the digestion process from a mesophilic anaerobic batch digester fed with food waste were investigated under different solid retention time. The value of BDP based on nitrate removal ranged from 176.3 to 48.3 mg-N/g-VSdigestate, corresponding well to the digestion time, and strongly correlated with total organic carbon content. Evolution trends similar to respiration index (RI) and biochemical methane potential (BMP) can be also observed for BDP, indicating that values presented of these stability indices decreased with the degree of digestate stabilization. The mass balance of the BDP process indicated that nitrate was mainly converted into N2 gas with mineralizing organic carbon from digestate, implying that biostability evaluated by BDP depends on carbon source and denitrification activity in digestate. The denitrifying bacteria Thiopseudomonas and Pseudomonas accounted for the majority of microorganisms. These findings of this study concluded that BDP can be an efficient indicator to assess the bio-stability of digestate planned for agricultural or land use. Compared with the existing biostability index, BDP has the additional advantage of no exogenous inoculum addition, homogenous test condition and possibility of shortening incubation time.This study was performed to assess the Latvian population exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDD), dechlorane-related compounds (DRCs), and emerging brominated flame retardants (EBFRs). Food items including fish, fish products, meat, dairy products, cereals and bread, eggs, vegetable oils, and sweets were analyzed for the content of these contaminants, followed by per capita intake calculations and risk assessment. The highest dietary exposure for general population was observed in the case of HBCDD, .reaching an estimated daily intake (EDI) value of 2.92 ng kg-1 b.w. (or 3.35 ng kg-1 b.w. if an outlying data point is included), followed by PBDEs with EDI of 1.24 ng kg-1 b.w., including ~25% contribution of PBDE-209 to the overall EDI from PBDEs. this website DRCs and EBFRs were secondary contributors to the total intake of selected flame retardants (FRs), with the observed EDIs of 0.46 and 0.47 ng kg-1 b.w, respectively. The obtained occurrence data and risk characterization according to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) approach showed the calculated margin of exposure (MOE) values higher than the critical values for PBDE-47, -99 and -153as well as for HBCDD, indicating that the estimated dietary exposures are unlikely to be of significant health concern for the Latvian population. At the same time, it should be pointed out that the risk assessment was performed only for five out of the twenty-five selected halogenated flame retardants (HFRs), while cumulative effects due to the potential presence of other HFRs and their biodegradation products were not considered.The huge amount of food waste (FW), containing high organic matter content and moisture, is difficult to be well treated. Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) can efficiently convert FW to H2-rich syngas. However, it requires high energy input due to the high temperature and high pressure. This study provided an innovative "two-steps heating process" for the SCWG of FW, which firstly utilized hydrothermal (HT) pretreatment to shorter time of SCWG. The effects of different HT temperature (200 °C, 250 °C, 300 °C, 30 min) to SCWG temperature (480 °C, 30 min) and the different residence time (20 min HT - 40 min SCWG, 30 min HT - 30 min SCWG, and 40 min HT - 20 min SCWG) on total syngas yield, carbon conversion efficiency (CE), cold gas efficiency (CGE), and hydrogen conversion efficiency (HE) were studied. Moreover, the energy input by means of electricity consumption in each experiment was measured to determine the energy saving rate. The optimal condition (200 °C, 20 min HT - 40 min SCWG), obtaining the gas yield (17.22 mol/kg), CE (20.10%), CGE (22.13%), and HE (41.54%), was higher than the gas yield (16.53 mol/kg), CE (19.98%), CGE (20%), and HE (38.08%) of directly SCWG (60 min, 0 °C-480 °C). Moreover, the TOC of derived liquid and the pyrolysis characteristics of solid residues were analyzed. Additionally, it was also observed the HT pretreatment helped to reduce the electricity consumption. The highest energy saving rate was 15.58%.Methane (CH4) is one of the most important greenhouse gases which can be formed by methanogens and oxidized by methanotrophs, as well as ammonia oxidizers. Agricultural soils can be both a source and sink for atmospheric CH4. However, it is unclear how climate change, will affect CH4 emissions and the underlying functional guilds. In this field study, we determined the impact of simulated climate change (a warmer and drier condition) and its legacy effect on CH4 emissions and the methanogenic and methanotrophic communities, as well as their relationships with ammonia oxidizers in an acidic soil with urea application. The climate change conditions were simulated in a greenhouse, and the legacy effect was simulated by removing the greenhouse after twelve months. Simulated climate change significantly decreased the in situ CH4 emissions in the urea-treated soils while the legacy effect significantly decreased the in situ CH4 emissions in the control plots, but had very little effect in the urea-treated soils. This indicates that the impact of simulated climate change and its legacy on CH4 emissions was significantly modified by nitrogen fertilization. Methanotrophs were more sensitive than methanogens in response to simulated climate change and its legacy effect, especially in the urea treated soil. Significant negative correlations were observed between the abundances of ammonia oxidizers and methanotrophs. Additionally, results of partial least path modeling (PLS-PM) indicated that the interactions of methanogens and methanotrophs with ammonia oxidizing archaea (AOA) had significant positive relationships with in situ CH4 emissions under the simulated climate change condition. Our work highlights the important role of AOA for CH4 emissions under climate change conditions. Further research is needed to better understand this effect in other ecosystems.
Here's my website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/epacadostat-incb024360.html
|
Notes.io is a web-based application for taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000 notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 12 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team