Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
Objective We selectively place carotid shunting when ipsilateral mean stump pressure is less than 40 mmHg during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study aimed to assess the validity of our selective shunting criterion by 1D-0D hemodynamic simulation technology. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients (95 cases) of CEA and divided them into two groups based on the degree of contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis ratio, which was determined as severe when the peak systolic velocity ratio of the ICA to the common carotid artery was ≥4 by carotid duplex ultrasonography. Patients with severe stenosis or occlusion in contralateral ICA were classified as hypoperfusion group, and those without such contralateral ICA obstruction were classified as control group. Results Perioperatively, the mean carotid stump pressures were 33 mmHg in hypoperfusion group and 46 mmHg in the control group (P=0.006). We simulated changes in carotid stump pressure according to the changes in the contralateral ICA stenosis ratio. 1D-0D simulation indicated a sharp decline in carotid stump pressure when the contralateral stenosis ratio was >50%, while peripheral pressure of the middle cerebral arteries declined sharply at a ≥70% contralateral stenosis ratio. At this ratio, the direction of the ipsilateral cerebral arterial flow became inverted, the carotid stump pressure became dependent on the basilar artery circulation, and the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery became hypoperfused. Conclusion Our clinical and computer-simulated results confirmed the validation of our carotid shunting criterion and suggested that contralateral ICA stenosis ratio over 70% is a safe indication of selective shunting during CEA.Objective The correlation between lipoproteins and arterial thrombosis is not fully elucidated, and no data exist in terms of lipoprotein profiles before heparin administration in patients with coronary arterial thrombosis (CAT). This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the lipoprotein profile before heparin administration in 63 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with CAT. Methods The lipoprotein profile was measured via polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis prior to heparin administration for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI. Age- and sex-matched subjects with less then 25% stenosis in stable coronary artery disease were enrolled as controls. Results In the pre-heparin serum, the fraction of very-low-density lipoprotein (P=0.75) in STEMI patients was not different from that in controls, and the fraction of intermediate-density lipoprotein (P less then 0.01) in STEMI patients was significantly lower than that in controls. Although the fraction of small dense low-density lipoprotein (s-LDL) in STEMI patients was significantly higher than that in controls (P less then 0.01), 44% (28/63) of STEMI patients were negative for s-LDL. Conclusion Although lipoproteins are a risk factor for atherosclerosis, lipoprotein profiles with CAT following atherosclerosis in STEMI are different from those profiles without CAT in stable coronary artery disease.Objective To determine the prognostic value of regional tissue oxygenation saturation (rSO2) for ulcer healing after endovascular treatment (EVT) of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Materials and Methods Among PAD patients, 34 patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia underwent EVT for limb salvage. We retrospectively analyzed the cutoff rSO2 values on postoperative day 1 to predict ulcer healing and patient prognosis. Skin perfusion pressure (SPP) and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) were also used to assess wound healing. Results A finger-mounted tissue oximeter can easily measure rSO2 on the dorsal foot. Among the 34 patients, the ulcer healed in 25, and no changes were observed in 2 patients at 1 month after EVT. However, 7 patients needed major amputation at the same time. Wound healing was achieved in all patients with rSO2≥50%. With this cutoff, the sensitivity and specificity of the new device for wound healing were 100% and 64%, respectively. In all the wound healing cases, SPP was ≥45 mmHg, and TcPO2 was ≥40 mmHg. Conclusion To assess limb ischemia, rSO2 can be measured quickly and easily using this device. We suggest that an rSO2>50% shows good prognosis for ulcer healing.Objective Refractory type 1a endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) can pose a significant challenge to surgeons and interventional radiologists. Continuous sac expansion results in aneurysm rupture and mortality. In such circumstances, an external infrarenal aortic wrap could serve as an essential and alternative solution. Bcl-2 lymphoma Methods We assessed the application of an infrarenal aortic neck wrap for the treatment of refractory type 1a endoleak in n=6 consecutive patients along with the introduction of a novel assessment technique in order to assure their intraoperative success with no radiation exposure and contrast use. Results The median sac expansion was 8.5 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 5-20 mm). The median neck diameter and length of the aortic neck were 23 mm (IQR, 18-25 mm) and 21 mm (IQR, 18-25 mm), respectively. The median length of follow-up post wrap is 24 months (IQR, 14-34 months). There was no associated mortality or morbidity and requirement for any further interventions. Conclusion The study demonstrates that aortic wrapping for the treatment of refractory type 1a endoleak for any given neck diameter and length is safe, effective, and long lasting. The suggested novel intraoperative assessment technique contributes to the safety of the procedure by diminishing the need for intraoperative radiation exposure, contrast, and shorter operative time.Objective To find a new predictor of endoleak (EL) and aneurysm sac expansion after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), we evaluated the platelet count recovery (PCR) process after EVAR. Materials and Methods Two hundred five patients treated with elective EVAR from 2007 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the platelet count ratio until postoperative day (POD) 7 to the presurgical baseline between patients with and without persistent EL (≥ 6 months). Subsequently, we calculated the optimal platelet count ratio for distinguishing persistent EL using receiver-operating characteristics analysis. A platelet count ratio on POD7 ≥118% was defined as the PCR. We evaluated the PCR's influence on the cumulative aneurysm sac expansion rate. Results The average platelet count ratio on POD7 rose above baseline (112%), and the ratio was attenuated by persistent EL (103%). Of 205 patients, 126 (61%) were assigned to the disturbed PCR group (PCR(-) group). Cumulative aneurysm sac expansion rate was higher in the PCR(-) group than the PCR(+) group (34.
Read More: https://www.selleckchem.com/Bcl-2.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team