Notes
Notes - notes.io |
Introduction There is increasing recognition of the central role of muscle mass in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with liver disease. Muscle size can be extracted from computed tomography (CT) scans, but clinical implementation will require increased automation. We hypothesize that we can achieve this by using artificial intelligence. Methods Using deep convolutional neural networks, we trained an algorithm on the Reference Analytic Morphomics Population (n = 5,268) and validated the automated methodology in an external cohort of adult kidney donors with a noncontrast CT scan (n = 1,655). To test the clinical usefulness, we examined its ability to predict clinical outcomes in a prospectively followed cohort of patients with clinically diagnosed cirrhosis (n = 254). Results Between the manual and automated methodologies, we found excellent inter-rater agreement with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.957 (confidence interval 0.953-0.961, P less then 0.0001) in the adult kidney donor cohort. The calculated dice similarity coefficient was 0.932 ± 0.042, suggesting excellent spatial overlap between manual and automated methodologies. To assess the clinical usefulness, we examined its ability to predict clinical outcomes in a cirrhosis cohort and found that automated psoas muscle index was independently associated with mortality after adjusting for age, gender, and child's classification (P less then 0.001). Discussion We demonstrated that deep learning techniques can allow for automation of muscle measurements on clinical CT scans in a diseased cohort. These automated psoas size measurements were predictive of mortality in patients with cirrhosis showing proof of principal that this methodology may allow for wider implementation in the clinical arena.Introduction This study aimed to assess the association between incident Crohn's disease (CD) or incident ulcerative colitis (UC) and dietary zinc intake. Methods NutriNet-Santé cohort's participants who completed at least three 24-hour dietary records were included and incident CD or UC cases were identified. Multivariable Poisson models were performed to assess associations between tertiles of zinc intake and CD or UC. Results Among the 105,832 participants, 27 reported incident CD and 48 reported incident UC. The relative risks of CD decreased with dietary zinc intakes. Compared with participants with the lowest tertile of zinc intake, the relative risks for CD were 0.60 (95% confidence interval [0.22-1.66]) and 0.12 (95% confidence interval [0.02-0.73]) for the second and the highest tertiles, respectively (Ptrend = 0.02). No significant association was observed for UC. Discussion Dietary zinc intake was inversely associated with incident CD.Introduction The risk of liver injury in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has not been previously examined using liver function tests as the primary outcome in the real-world setting. This study assessed the association between NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) and warfarin and the risk of liver injury, as defined by laboratory tests. Methods Patients newly diagnosed with AF and prescribed NOACs or warfarin between 2010 and 2016, identified using the Hong Kong Clinical Database and Reporting System, were matched on age, sex, health status scores, comorbidities, and medications by propensity score on a 11 ratio. Risk of liver injury, defined as laboratory test values >3 times the upper limit of normal of alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase and >2 times the upper limit of normal of total bilirubin, was compared between NOAC and warfarin users using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results After propensity score matching, 13,698 patients were included, of which 141 (2.1%) NOAC users and 232 (3.4%) warfarin users developed liver injury. The hazard ratio (HR) for NOAC vs warfarin users was 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.58-0.89). When comparing individual NOACs, only dabigatran (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.82) was associated with a lower risk of liver injury. Discussion Among patients with AF, NOACs as a group, and dabigatran alone were associated with a significantly lower risk of laboratory-based liver injury when compared with warfarin. However, liver injury occurs more frequently in real-world practice than in NOAC randomized controlled trials.Background Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a rapidly growing multisystem disease with extrahepatic manifestations, including effects on the cardiovascular (CV) system. The leading cause of death in NAFLD is of cardiac etiology being ischemic heart disease. Areas of uncertainty NAFLD is associated with several CV complications including cardiac structural and functional alterations. However, there are no current approved pharmacotherapies for treating NAFLD, leading to increased CV risk with an increasing morbidity and mortality. Data sources We summarize the currently available therapeutic strategies in managing NAFLD and their cardioprotective effects according to recently published data, guidelines, and practice guidance recommendations. Therapeutic advances Several therapeutic modalities evaluated in NAFLD include nonpharmacological strategies, pharmacotherapies and surgical management. Nonpharmacological strategies are recommended in early stages of NAFLD and include weight loss, physical actidualized medicine approach. Early lifestyle modifications are essential in NAFLD to reduce CV risk. Experimental studies are required to confirm hepatic and cardioprotective effects associated with several drugs. Bariatric surgery remains of limited use.Objective The objective was to assess the impact of a prosthesis and the timing of prosthesis receipt on total direct health care costs in the 12 months post-amputation period. Design Data on patients with LLA (n=510) were obtained from a commercial claims database for retrospective cohort analysis. Generalized linear multivariate modeling was used to determine differences in cost between groups according to timing of prosthesis receipt compared to a control group with no prosthesis. Results Receipt of a prosthesis between 0 and 3 months post-LLA yielded a reduced total cost by approximately 0.23 in log scale within 12 months following amputation when compared to the no-prosthesis group. Despite the included costs of a prosthesis, individuals that received a prosthesis either at 4-6 months post-amputation or 7-9 months post-amputation incurred costs similar to the no-prosthesis group. selleck inhibitor Conclusion Earlier receipt of a prosthesis is associated with reduced spending in the 12 months post-amputation of approximately $25,000 compared to not receiving a prosthesis.
Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/apo866-fk866.html
|
Notes.io is a web-based application for taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000 notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 12 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team