Notes![what is notes.io? What is notes.io?](/theme/images/whatisnotesio.png)
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
PURPOSE To investigate the characteristics of recurrent retinal detachment (RD) after diabetic vitrectomy (DV). METHODS Consecutive cases underwent vitrectomy for recurrent RD after DV was collected and separated into the following four groups for analysis rhegmatogenous RD (RRD), pure tractional RD (Proliferative Subgroup 1), combined RD with proliferative tissue within the equator (Proliferative Subgroup 2), and combined RD with both posterior and peripheral proliferations (Proliferative Subgroup 3). RESULTS Of the 41 cases enrolled, retinal reattachment was achieved in 73.2%. Over all, visual acuity was statistically better after operation (p = 0.001). All cases in the RRD group (four cases) had reattachment and a better final vision (p = 0.008). In the proliferative subgroups, those with pure tractional RD (Subgroup 1, seven cases) had the best visual acuity at the time of recurrent RD (p = 0.002). Subgroups 2 and 3 showed statistically significant better final visual acuity (p = 0.045 and 0.019, respectively). Poor preoperative vision (p = 0.001), non-attachment (p = 0.004), and neovascular glaucoma (p = 0.001) were associated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS Visual acuity may improve after operation for recurrent RD after diabetic vitrectomy. Visual prognosis was better in cases with pure RRD. In the proliferative subgroups, vision was impaired by the development of neovascular glaucoma and retinal non-attachment.PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in relation to optical biometry devices and refraction types. METHODS Patients undergoing cataract phacoemulsification and insertion of the MX60 IOL were enrolled. Optical biometric measurements were performed with both IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar 900. Biometry measurements were compared between devices. Oleic price A subsample of 133 eyes (81.1%) had examination for both autorefraction and subjective refraction postoperatively. The differences between the postoperative refraction and the refraction predicted by eight formulas (Kane, Hill-RBF 2.0, Barrett Universal II, Olsen, Haigis, SRK/T, Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q) were calculated. RESULTS Overall, this study comprised 164 eyes of 164 patients. High agreement between the two biometers for axial length, average keratometry readings, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and central corneal thickness was found (interclass correlation confidents 0.999, 0.988, 0.965, 0.865 and 0.972, respectively, all P less then 0.001). The absolute prediction error calculated with IOLMaster 700 measurements was significantly lower than that calculated with Lenstar 900 measurements for Olsen (P = 0.003), Haigis (P less then 0.001) and Hoffer Q (P = 0.028). OPD-Scan III gave slightly more negative readings than subjective refraction (mean difference - 0.107 ± 0.553, P = 0.003 for spherical equivalent). However, no significant difference in absolute prediction error was found between the two refraction types per each formula. CONCLUSION IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar 900 showed good agreement in biometric measurements with a trend toward better refractive outcome using IOLMaster 700. The accuracy of IOL calculation assessed with OPD autorefraction was equivalent to that assessed with subjective refraction.BACKGROUND To evaluate the efficacy of corneal tattooing for various clinical applications. METHODS The medical charts of 62 eyes of 62 patients who underwent corneal tattooing between March 2016 and August 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The causes of opacity and various methods of corneal tattooing were analyzed. RESULTS Among our 62 patients, 38 were males and 24 were females. Average age was 48.47 ± 15.30 (range, 12-74) years old. The mean follow-up period was 40.19 ± 2.34 (range, 36-43) months. The most common causes of corneal opacity were ocular trauma (33 eyes, 53.2%), prior retinal surgery (9 eyes, 14.5%), congenital etiologies (8 eyes, 12.9%) and measles (5 eyes, 8.0%). The most common associated ocular findings were strabismus (23 eyes, 37.0%), phthisis bulbi (17 eyes, 27.4%) and band keratopathy (13 eyes, 20.9%). Cosmetic outcomes improved without serious complications in all cases. CONCLUSIONS Corneal tattooing is a viable option with an expanding set of indications, such as discolored previous corneal tattoos, white pupil due to inoperable cataract with clear cornea and dense corneal opacities in blind eyes. Elective corneal tattooing seems to be a viable and convenient method to improve cosmesis with minimal complications and high patient satisfaction.The ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila has been a powerful model system for molecular and cellular biology. However, some investigations have been limited due to the incomplete closure and sequencing of the macronuclear genome assembly, which for many years has been stalled at 1,158 scaffolds, with large sections of unknown sequences (available in Tetrahymena Genome Database, TGD, http//ciliate.org/). Here we completed the first chromosome-level Tetrahymena macronuclear genome assembly, with approximately 300× long Single Molecule, Real-Time reads of the wild-type SB210 cells-the reference strain for the initial macronuclear genome sequencing project. All 181 chromosomes were capped with two telomeres and gaps were entirely closed. The completed genome shows significant improvements over the current assembly (TGD 2014) in both chromosome structure and sequence integrity. The majority of previously identified gene models shown in TGD were retained, with the addition of 36 new genes and 883 genes with modified gene models. The new genome and annotation were incorporated into TGD. This new genome allows for pursuit in some underexplored areas that were far more challenging previously; two of them, genome scrambling and chromosomal copy number, were investigated in this study. We expect that the completed macronuclear genome will facilitate many studies in Tetrahymena biology, as well as multiple lines of research in other eukaryotes.BACKGROUND Lutetium oxyorthosilicate or lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) scintillation crystals used in most current PET scanner detectors contain 176Lu, which decays by beta emission to excited states of 176Hf accompanied by the emission of prompt gamma rays or internal conversion electrons. This intrinsic radioactivity can be self-detected in singles mode as a constant background signal that has an energy spectrum whose structure has been explained previously. In this work, we studied the energy spectrum due to the intrinsic radioactivity of LYSO scintillation crystals of two opposing detectors working in coincidence mode. The investigation included experimental data, Monte Carlo simulations and an analytical model. RESULTS The structure of the energy spectrum was completely understood and is the result of the self-detection of beta particles from 176Lu in one crystal and the detection of one or more prompt gamma rays detected in coincidence by the opposing crystal. The most probable coincidence detection involves the gamma rays of 202 and 307 keV, which result in two narrow photopeaks, superimposed on a continuous energy distribution due to the beta particle energy deposition.
My Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/oleic-acid.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team