Notes
Notes - notes.io |
0%) patients. Two minor strokes were associated with in-stent thrombosis (0.7%). The 4-year follow-up showed 82% overall survival (95% CI 69-91%) with no significant difference between asymptomatic (77%) and symptomatic patients (97%;
= 0.076). The stroke-free survival was 89% (95% CI 77-95%), 84% asymptomatic vs. 98% symptomatic (
= 0.187). Seven (2.3%) patients developed > 50% in-stent restenosis.
Carotid artery stenting using the Roadsaver stent for symptomatic patients and high risk lesions showed to be safe and effective, with a low complication rate and acceptable in-stent restenosis risk in 4-year follow-up.
Carotid artery stenting using the Roadsaver stent for symptomatic patients and high risk lesions showed to be safe and effective, with a low complication rate and acceptable in-stent restenosis risk in 4-year follow-up.
Despite the establishment of multiple factors influencing short- and mid-term outcomes in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the real-world data on the association between gender and outcomes after TAVI remain conflicting.
To evaluate the association of female gender with the clinical and periprocedural characteristics along with in-hospital, short- and medium-term outcomes of patients treated with TAVI in comparison with male patients.
Data from the prospective, single-centre registry of consecutive patients with severe AS referred for TAVI from 26 November 2008 to 31 December 2018 were analysed retrospectively. The study population comprised 275 patients who were divided by gender. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality at 1 year.
Women constituted 132 (48.0%) of the overall population. Women were significantly older, but had a significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and had less frequently undergone coronary artery bypass tal, 30-day, 6-month and 12-month outcomes did not differ significantly from the male patients.
Paradoxically, the literature lacks an assessment of the impact of various factors on subsequent coronary interventions in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
To assess the impact of various factors on subsequent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), as well as to characterize the clinical profile of people undergoing repeated diagnostic coronary angiography without significant coronary artery changes.
We investigated retrospective data from 4041 subjects according to the clinical factors which may affect the occurrence of unplanned future PTCA.
The strongest risk factors for subsequent PTCA were significant stenosis of left descending artery (OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.09-4.32) during baseline coronary angiography, the atherosclerotic burden (number of critically narrowed vessels) (OR for narrowing lesions in 3 epicardial arteries 12.13, 95% CI 5.40-27.27), and restenosis in a previously implanted stent (OR = 4.34, 95% CI 1.96-9.62). A strong positive relationship between total morhose previous coronary angiography did not show significant stenosis, because other clinical causes may explain their symptoms.
Well-organized, effective secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) has a potential to improve the patients' prognosis following myocardial revascularization procedures.
To evaluate overtime changes in the implementation of the ESC guidelines for secondary prevention by assessing control of the main risk factors and the rate of cardioprotective drug use in patients following myocardial revascularization procedures.
Patients aged < 81 years who had been hospitalized for a myocardial revascularization procedure in five hospitals serving Krakow and surrounding districts were recruited and interviewed 6-18 months following discharge. Their personal medical history, medication use and control of the main cardiovascular risk factors were evaluated using a standard questionnaire in 2006-2007, 2011-2013, and 2016-2017. The same five hospitals took part in surveys on each occasion.
We examined 260 patients in 2006-2007, 200 in 2011-2013 and 190 in 2016-2017. We noted a significant difference in y, and the proportion of those with high fasting glucose was 12.6%, 14.6%, and 19.7%, respectively. The proportion of smokers was 16.2%, 19.5%, and 16.8%, whereas 30.5%, 28.6% and 40.5% of patients were obese in 2006-2007, 2011-2013 and 2016-2017, respectively. The proportion of patients taking antiplatelets (91.8% vs. 92.0% vs. 96.3%), β-blockers (90.3% vs. 87.5% vs. 92.6%), and lipid-lowering drugs (88.7% vs. 91.0% vs. 93.7%) did not change significantly.Conclusions The analysis of three multicenter surveys provides evidence of the considerable potential for a further reduction in cardiovascular risk in patients following elective myocardial revascularization in Poland.
There are limited data on platelet reactivity and response to antiplatelet drugs in patients with cardiogenic shock.
To assess platelet reactivity on dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ticagrelor, a novel potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, in patients with cardiogenic shock in the course of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who received invasive treatment.
We enrolled 12 consecutive patients with ACS complicated by cardiogenic shock. To assess response to antiplatelet therapy during cardiogenic shock, only patients with symptoms persisting for at least 3 days and who completed a 5-day follow-up were included in the study. Patients received a loading dose of ASA (300 mg) and ticagrelor (180 mg), followed by a maintenance dose (ASA, 1 × 75 mg; ticagrelor, 2 × 90 mg). Blood samples for platelet function tests were collected. Platelet aggregation was assessed with a Multiplate whole-blood impedance aggregometer. Arachidonic acid (AA), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) were used as aggregation agonists.
Response to antiplatelet therapy assessed by aggregometry showed numerically higher on-ASA platelet reactivity on day one and statistically significant higher on-ticagrelor platelet reactivity on day one in comparison with following days. There were 2 patients with high on ASA platelet reactivity and 3 with high on ticagrelor platelet reactivity, but only on the day one.
Some patients with cardiogenic shock in the course of ACS treated invasively show a lower response to ASA and ticagrelor only on the first day after invasive treatment, with a good response on subsequent days.
Some patients with cardiogenic shock in the course of ACS treated invasively show a lower response to ASA and ticagrelor only on the first day after invasive treatment, with a good response on subsequent days.
Radial or brachial access may be preferred in the case of severe peripheral artery disease (PAD) or difficult aortic arch anatomy during carotid artery stenting (CAS).
To evaluate the clinical conditions indicating potential benefit from non-femoral access as well as feasibility and safety of transradial/transbrachial access (TRA/TBA) as an alternative approach for CAS.
Since 2013, 67 patients (mean age 70 years old, 44 men, 42% symptomatic) were selected for CAS with the TRA/TBA approach. The composite endpoint was stroke/death/myocardial infarction within 30 days of the procedure and compared to the propensity score matched transfemoral approach (TFA) group. Clinical (including neurological) examination and Doppler ultrasonography were performed before the procedure, at discharge and at 30 days.
CAS with TRA/TBA was successful in 63/67 patients. Transfemoral access was not feasible due to PAD in 35 (52.2%) patients, bovine arch in 10 (14.9%), obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m
) in 9 (13.4%), severe degenerative disease of the spine in 7 (10.5%), arch type III in 5 (7.5%) and excessive subclavian stent protrusion in 1 (1.5%) patient. Mean NASCET carotid artery stenosis was reduced from 81% to 9% (
< 0.001). The composite endpoint occurred in 3 (4.8%) cases and it was not statistically significantly different from the matched TFA group (6.3%;
= 0.697). No access site complications requiring surgical intervention or blood transfusion developed.
Transradial and transbrachial CAS may be an effective and safe procedure, and it may constitute a viable alternative to the femoral approach in patients with severe PAD, difficult aortic arch anatomy or obesity.
Transradial and transbrachial CAS may be an effective and safe procedure, and it may constitute a viable alternative to the femoral approach in patients with severe PAD, difficult aortic arch anatomy or obesity.
Patients treated within chronic total occlusions (CTO) using percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at increased risk of periprocedural complications.
To assess the frequency of periprocedural complications with particular emphasis on coronary artery perforations (CAPs) among patients treated with PCIs stratified according to CTOs and their predictors.
Based on a nationwide registry (ORPKI), we analysed 535,853 patients treated with PCI between 2014 and 2018. The study included 12,572 (2.34%) patients treated with CTO PCI. We compared CTO PCI to a non-CTO PCI group before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Multifactorial mixed regression models were used to assess predictors of periprocedural complications and CAPs which occurred within the catheterization laboratory.
Frequencies of all periprocedural complications (2.75% vs. 1.93%,
< 0.001) and CAP (0.72% vs. Selleckchem EGFR inhibitor 0.16%,
< 0.001) were significantly higher in the CTO PCI group. Multifactorial regression analysis performed in the all-comers group of patients treated with PCI showed that PCI within CTO was related to a higher CAP rate (odds ratio (OR) = 2.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68-2.82,
< 0.001). After PSM, we extracted 5,652 patients treated within CTO and 5,652 patients with non-CTO PCI. CTO PCI was also related to a higher frequency of CAPs (OR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.11-3.31,
= 0.01).
The frequency of periprocedural complications and CAPs remained stable during the assessed period of time. CTO PCI was confirmed to be among the predictors of increased CAP rate in the overall group of patients treated within CTO.
The frequency of periprocedural complications and CAPs remained stable during the assessed period of time. CTO PCI was confirmed to be among the predictors of increased CAP rate in the overall group of patients treated within CTO.
Elevated risk of adverse events in comparison to metallic stents resulted in withdrawal of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (eBVS), known as the most intensively studied BVS. There is a paucity of data comparing the two different BVS.
To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of the novolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (nBVS) compared with eBVS.
Consecutive patients treated with nBVS or eBVS in our center were screened. The primary outcome was the 3-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and target-lesion revascularization (TLR).
After matching, 98 patients treated with 135 eBVS were compared with 98 patients treated with 136 nBVS. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and lesion characteristics were comparable in both groups. The 3-year MACE rate was higher in the eBVS group (17.3% vs. 6.1%;
log-rank = 0.02). The occurrence of TLR (16.3% vs. 5.1%;
log-rank = 0.
Homepage: https://www.selleckchem.com/EGFR(HER).html
|
Notes.io is a web-based application for taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000 notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 12 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team