Notes
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
Introduction A patent digestive anastomosis is not only the result of the surgery team experience, but also dependent on the patientâ??s factors. Accepting the possible dramatic effects of an anastomotic leak, identification of risk factors remains a priority in case management. Material and methods Multifactorial assessment scores permit risk quantification, increase grade of suspicion and early management implementation. The correlation between diverse potential risk factors and anastomotic leak (AL) was studied. The identified risk factors were included in a predictive score system. FISTULA SCORE represents a feasible instrument based on 12 clinical, paraclinical and therapeutic variables, with good statistical significance (Se = 79.5%, Sp = 90.2%). Results Anastomotic leaks (AL) were observed in 39 cases (7.68%) out of 508 patients analysed, appearing in days 2 - 10 after surgery, with a mean value of 6 days. FISTULA SCORE was based on attributed risks found in our study group for each factor and has the purpose to identify patients at risk for AL and, in some cases, to change the therapeutic or surgical strategy. In AL patients group, the mean score was 5.06 1.95 points, and in AL-free patients group - 1.57 1.61 points. Conclusions The risk for AL must be appreciated and quantified with a multivariable scoring system. FISTULA SCORE can identify, with a good statistical significance, patient at risk for AL, changing the management of case, reducing length of stay, costs, morbidities, mortality and psychological effects on patient and medical stuff.Introduction Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is routinely used in preoperative rectal cancer staging. The concordance of MRI staging with final pathologic exam, albeit improved, has not yet reached perfection. The aim of this study is to analyze the agreement between MRI and pathologic exam in patients operated on for mid-low rectal cancer. Material and Method Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) or upfront surgery were analyzed. Between January 2019 to December 2019, 140 patients enrolled in the AIMS Academy rectal cancer registry were analyzed. Sixty-two patients received nCRT and 78 underwent upfront surgery. Results Overall, the agreement between MRI and pathologic exam on T stage and N stage were 64.7% and 69.2%, respectively. The agreement between MRI and pathologic exam on T stage was 62.7% for patients who did not receive nCRT and 67.4% for patients who received nCRT (p = 0.62). The agreement on N stage was 76.3% for patients who did not receive nCRT and 60.0% for patients who received nCRT (p = 0.075). Conclusions Real-world data shows MRI is still far from being able to correlate with the pathology findings which raises questions about the accuracy of the real-life decision-making process during cancer boards.
The present study compares abdominoperineal resection (APR) performed by minimally invasive and open approach, regarding preoperative selection criteria, intraoperative and early postoperative aspects, in choosing the suitable technique performed by surgical teams with experience in both open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
This is a retrospective study, conducted between 2008-2020. Two hundred thirty-three patients with APR performed for low rectal or anal cancer were included. The cohort was divided into two groups, depending on the surgical approach used Minimally Invasive Surgery (laparoscopic and robotic procedures) and Open Surgery (OS). The perioperative characteristics were analyzed in order to identify the optimal approach and a possible selection criteria.
We identified a high percentage of patients with a history of abdominal surgery in the open group (p = .0002). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the open group (p= .02), with an increased number of simultaneous reated severe comorbidities. The hystopathological results identified a significant number of patients with stage T2 in the MIS group (p= .037). Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery provides a major advantage to APR, by avoiding an additional incision, the specimen being extracted through the perineal wound. The success of MIS APR seems to be assured by a good preoperative selection of the patients, alongside with experienced surgical teams in both open and minimally invasive rectal resections. The lack of conversion identified in robotic APR confirm the technical superiority over laparoscopic approach.Background Nowadays, the repair of inguinal hernias is mostly achieved through a minimally invasive approach (TAPP or TEP) which has well-known advantages. However, the Lichtenstein mesh technique still has some particular indications. Methods We reviewed 256 consecutive patients who underwent a Lichtenstein procedure during 5 years (2015-2019) in the Department of General Surgery of "Dr. I. Cantacuzino" Clinical Hospital. The vast majority of them - 180 (74%) were 60 or older and 105 (41%) were over 70. Severe cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and other significant co-morbidities were recorded in 128 patients (50%). Results 240 patients had a favorable evolution, 12 experienced local complications, while in 4 we recorded severe cardiac post-operative events.1 patient died due to a massive myocardial infarction. Conclusions The surgical treatment of inguinal hernias should be adapted to the age and biological status of the patient; surgical departments must be able to provide both a laparoscopic and an open-surgery approach.Background We present a comparative analysis of survival, complications and major risk factors in patients who underwent surgery for pancreatic head carcinoma. Methods This is a single-centre retrospective study aimed to evaluate clinical, surgical and pathoanatomical features of 467 patients who underwent radical surgery for pancreatic head carcinoma between September 2004 and October 2019. The series includes 88 patients (18.8%) with venous resections for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results The estimated median survival rates were statistically significant with 19.3 months in pancreatoduodenal venous resections (VR) and 26.9 months in pancreatoduodenal resections (PDR), respectively (p=0.047). On the other hand, one, three, and five-year survival rates of 46.6%, 17.6% and 8.3% in VR, and 53.6%, 20.8%, 14.9% in PDR were not statistically significant (p=0.13, 0.5 and 0.11 respectively). Survival rates comparison in PDR, VR, and palliative procedures (PP) between the three groups showed statistical significance (p 0.05). The clinically relevant postoperative complications in venous resections (13.6%) vs. 14.8% in PDR were not statistically significant (p=0.77). Postoperative bleeding and reoperation (p 0.05) are independent prognostic factors for worse outcomes. There was no statistically significant relationship between survival and presence of vascular invasion (p=0.581). Conclusions When performed by experienced surgeons at specialized high-volume centres, pancreatoduodenal resections combined with venous resection and reconstruction are reliable and safe surgical procedures.Local recurrence (LR) of rectal cancer (RC) has a disease-free survival rate of up to 50% if diagnosed early. Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is an outpatient procedure that can be used together with rectal digital examination for patient follow-up. This is the first study to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of ERUS in the detection of LR after RC and whether it is a good follow-up method. Three authors independently searched MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov databases and included relevant original studies based on strict inclusion/ exclusion criteria. 3220 articles were identified. After reading the abstracts, 50 articles were selected, out of which 22 were deemed suitable for study inclusion, comprising 3737 patients, which were followed for 59,72 -16,4 months. selleck products Based on the available data, sensitivity of ERUS was 88,3% (CI 84,6 - 91,3%), specificity was 94,3 % (CI 92,7 - 95,5%) and diagnostic odds ratio of ERUS was 271,88 (CI 76,998 - 960,04), with ERUS being the only diagnosis method to detect LR in 40 - 12%. Area under the curve for ERUS was 0,9723 - 0,0131. LR after curative treatment of RC in our study was 15 - 2,99%. Concluding, ERUS seems to be a good and efficient follow-up method for diagnosing RC LR.Sentinel Lymph node biopsy (SLNB) represents the standard approach in a newly diagnosed breast cancer for axillary staging in cases of clinical node negative. This represents a major prognostic factor and the biopsy of sentinel lymph node for early breast cancer is used as guidance in surgical and oncological treatment. Although for many decades, axillary lymph node dissection was the standard approach for breast cancer treatment and staging, this pathway was abandoned due to significant risk of lymphedema, infection, nerve and vessels injury or dysfunction of the shoulder. Therefore, significant improvement in the quality of life was seen for patients diagnosed with early breast cancer after SLNB was introduced as standard. The principle of SLNB is based on the hypothesis that tumor drains in the lymphatic system in an orderly manner and if the first lymphatic station is clear of disease, it is highly unlike that the tumor has spread further above. We present in our paper the indications with principles and difficulties in identification of sentinel node.Bile duct injuries represent the most dramatic complications after an open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The detrimental effects on patient quality of life and overall survival are the most obvious consequences of such injuries. An effective treatment strategy after accurate mapping of the injury type is the only method of averting these morbid consequences. Several classification systems have been proposed in an attempt to accurately describe and categorize bile duct injuries. The critical question is whether we truly need all these systems and whether each of these systems adds value to the existing knowledge base, or further obscures the field. Each classification system has several advantages to base its clinical utility on, but entails a reasonable number of limitations as well. Currently, a tailored approach adopting the classification system which provides the most appropriate guidance - either in terms of diagnosis or treatment decision making - appears to be the most justified option.The pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is multifactorial determined and remains a matter of discussions between the involved medical subspecialties, mainly gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal surgeons, but also ear-nose-and-throat colleagues and pulmonologists. The purpose of this manuscript is an overview on the different pathophysiologic components of GERD, their influence as well as a certain weighing of their involvement in the disease. The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) represents together with the muscles and ligamentous structures of the diaphragm at the esophageal hiatus the antireflux barrier between esophagus and stomach. The crucial factor in GERD is an increased amount of gastric contents refluxing into the esophagus above the physiologic level. This creates pathologic esophageal acid exposure (EAE) to the mucosa, which may lead to symptoms and damage. The underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms are anatomical components such as LES and diaphragm, and functional components such as LES-incompetence, transient LES relaxations, impaired esophageal motility, gastroduodenal dysfunctions and alterations of the refluxate such as duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux.
Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-888.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team