Notesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb108/eb108e1225c6a34726896a3a71243e18df6f7721" alt="what is notes.io? What is notes.io?"
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
PURPOSE To determine whether Demodex infestation in blepharitic patients can be confirmed by slit-lamp examination without the need for light microscopy. METHODS Demodex infestation was evaluated in 16 patients presenting with blepharitis and cylindrical dandruff at a single medical center from November 2014 to February 2015. Two lashes with cylindrical dandruff were epilated from each lid (8 per patient, total 128), mounted on slides, and examined in the clinic under a slit lamp equipped with a 90D condensing lens followed by light microscopy in the pathology laboratory. All evaluations were performed by the same pathologist. Mites were identified by their characteristic morphology and movement patterns. Findings were compared between the 2 methods. RESULTS The mean total Demodex count per lash was 1.5 ± 2.1 mites by using the slit lamp and 2 ± 2.9 mites by light microscopy. Corresponding counts per patient were 11.7 ± 9.4 and 16.1 ± 12.4. The correlation between the slit lamp and microscopy results was statistically significant, per lash (r = 0.922, P less then 0.01) and per patient (r = 0.976, P less then 0.01). On analysis by the more clinically relevant negative (no mites detected) or positive results (at least 1 mite detected), the accuracy of the slit-lamp examination for a single lash was 91.4% and the specificity and sensitivity were 89% and 94%, respectively; the negative predictive value was 93% [χ(1) = 87.94, P less then 0.01)]. All 16 patients were positive for Demodex infestation by both methods (accuracy 100%). CONCLUSIONS Demodex infestation in blepharitic patients with cylindrical dandruff can be confirmed using only a slit lamp and common eye clinic equipment.BACKGROUND Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is a detectable index after hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, which is a risk factor of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, few studies have focused on the expression of HBsAg in HCC patients' liver tissues. This study aimed to explore the potential utility of using HBsAg protein expression in normal liver tissues as a prognostic factor for HCC patients who underwent liver resection. STUDY DESIGN The study enrolled 100 HCC patients with seropositivity for HBsAg. The liver tissues were collected, and tissue microarrays were constructed. The expression of HBsAg in liver tissues were measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Relevant clinical data and follow-up records were collected for analysis. RESULTS HBsAg expressions was detected in 29 patients (positive group) and was unable to be detected in the remaining 71 patients (negative group). The patients in the positive group had higher HBV DNA levels (P less then 0.05) than the patients in the negative group. The overall survival (OS) rate of the positive group was worse than the OS rate of the negative group (P = 0.013). The OS rates after resection at 1 and 2 years in negative group were 90.1% and 85.7%, respectively, while the value in the positive group were 79.3% and 65.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that HBsAg expression in liver tissues, ascites and alpha-fetoprotein levels were independent factors influencing OS. Similarly, after propensity score matching (PSM), the OS was worse in the positive group than in the negative group, and HBsAg expression could also serve as a predictor for OS (P = 0.039). The OS rates after resection and PSM at 1 and 2 years were 93.2% and 85.9% in the negative group, while the value in the positive group were 79.3% and 65.5%. CONCLUSION As determined according to grouping based on immunohistochemistry staining results for HBsAg, this study indicated that HBsAg expression in liver tissues could predict the OS of HBV-related HCC patients after liver resection.STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort series. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine if the use of image-guided navigation offers a clinically significant advantage over fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw and non-navigated screw placement in reducing the risk of revision surgery for malpositioned screws in instrumented spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Use image-guided navigation has become increasingly commonplace in instrumented spine surgery, but there is a lack of information regarding differences in the rates of clinically relevant screw malposition with image-guided compared with non-navigated screw placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective cohort series of consecutive patients who underwent instrumented spinal surgery by the senior authors at 2 academic tertiary care centers in New York. RESULTS A total of 663 instrumented spinal surgeries were analyzed, including 271 instances with image-guided navigation. For the image-guided navigation cohort, 110 of the patients e may be an advantage offered by image-guided screw placement in instrumented spinal surgery.OBJECTIVE To evaluate the oncological outcome for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) randomized to associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) or 2-stage hepatectomy (TSH). BACKGROUND TSH with portal vein occlusion is an established method for patients with CRLM and a low volume of the future liver remnant (FLR). ALPPS is a less established method. The oncological outcome of these methods has not been previously compared in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS One hundred patients with CRLM and standardized FLR (sFLR) less then 30% were included and randomized to resection by ALPPS or TSH, with the option of rescue ALPPS in the TSH group, if the criteria for volume increase was not met. The first radiological follow-up was performed approximately 4 weeks postoperatively and then after 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months. At all the follow-ups, the remaining/recurrent tumor was noted. After the first follow-up, chemotherapy was administered, if indicated. RESULTS The resection rate, according to the intention-to-treat principle, was 92% (44 patients) for patients randomized to ALPPS compared with 80% (39 patients) for patients randomized to TSH (P = 0.091), including rescue ALPPS. At the first postoperative follow-up, 37 patients randomized to ALPPS were assessed as tumor free in the liver, and also 28 patients randomized to TSH (P = 0.028). The estimated median survival for patients randomized to ALPPS was 46 months compared with 26 months for patients randomized to TSH (P = 0.028). click here CONCLUSIONS ALPPS seems to improve survival in patients with CRLM and sFLR less then 30% compared with TSH.
Homepage: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/jtc-801.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team