Notes
Notes - notes.io |
A greater likelihood of vaccine recommendation was observed for pediatricians vs other medical specialties, group outpatient clinic vs other worksites, and seeing >50 patients/week (P < .05). One-third of PCPs were unlikely to recommend ≥1 vaccine, and the top reason reported was unfamiliarity with vaccine guidelines for patients with IBD (48.0%). A review of guidelines or continued medical education (63.0%) and decision support from EHRs (51.2%) were the most frequently selected approaches identified to improve certainty of vaccine recommendation.
There is room for improvement of vaccination recommendations by PCPs. Promoting continuing education and use of clinical tools may help support PCP immunization practices for patients with IBD.
There is room for improvement of vaccination recommendations by PCPs. Promoting continuing education and use of clinical tools may help support PCP immunization practices for patients with IBD.Meningioma is the most common primary central nervous system tumor, and its incidence is increasing. A systematic epidemiological and clinical analysis is required to better estimate its public health impact and understand its prognostic factors. Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2018 for all types of meningiomas without an age restriction. Age-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated according to sex, age, race, ethnicity, and tumor location. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the overall survival (OS). The competing risk regression model of Fine-Gray was used to analyze cause-specific survival. Vorinostat Data from a total of 109 660 meningioma patients were analyzed. A majority of patients were older than 60 years, and only 0.41% of patients were 0-19 years. The meningioma IRs were higher in females, Black, and non-Hispanic patients than in males, White, and Hispanic patients, respectively, and IRs increased with age. The ratio of IRs for females to males was 2.1 and also increased with age, peaking at 3.6 in the 45-49-year-old group. Older and male patients with all types of meningiomas, Black patients with benign and borderline meningiomas, and patients with larger borderline and malignant meningiomas showed poorer prognosis. For all meningioma types, surgical resection improved survival. The reported incidence rates and survival trends covered all demographics and subtypes of meningiomas. Older age, male sex, Black race, and tumor size may be important prognostic factors for meningioma cases, and tumor resection can substantially improve survival among meningioma patients.
Currently, the most widely used treatment for endothelial disease is endothelial replacement via endothelial keratoplasty. Increasingly selective techniques have allowed for increased safety and faster visual recovery. However, alternative treatment options that are lower in cost, require less surgical expertise, and rely less on tissue availability are needed. This review discusses established and emerging therapies for endothelial disease without keratoplasty.
Regenerative therapies that have been successful include Descemet stripping only and Descemet membrane transplants. Rho-kinase inhibitors promote cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration and appear to have a role in these treatments and possibly in the prevention of endothelial disease. Cell-based therapies and the development of an artificial endothelial implant have also demonstrated promising results.
There are numerous emerging treatments for endothelial disease that have proven successful. Advances in our understanding of disease pathogenesis on a cellular level will continue to expand possibilities for therapeutics.
There are numerous emerging treatments for endothelial disease that have proven successful. Advances in our understanding of disease pathogenesis on a cellular level will continue to expand possibilities for therapeutics.
To review the current literature on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in complex eyes.
DMEK surgery has become a standardized procedure in Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and simple bullous keratopathy. But eyes with more complex disease present unique intraoperative and postoperative challenges to the DMEK surgeon. Poor visualization during surgery, complex anterior segment anatomy, altered anterior chamber dynamics, glaucoma shunts, and congenital or iatrogenic missing or altered iris and lens make DMEK surgery extremely difficult to accomplish.
DMEK is feasible in complex eyes, including advanced bullous keratopathy, eyes with history of glaucoma or vitreoretinal surgery, previous penetrating keratoplasty, uveitis, pediatric, and congenital anterior segment disorders. The tools and methods reported in the literature to accomplish DMEK in complex eyes vary widely with no particular consensus or standardization of techniques. The outcomes noted for some of these conditions demonstrate the difficulty of the surgery and the uncertainty of long-term graft survival in complex eyes. Both surgical standardization and randomized prospective data will better help elucidate DMEK's role in the corneal rehabilitation of complex eyes.
DMEK is feasible in complex eyes, including advanced bullous keratopathy, eyes with history of glaucoma or vitreoretinal surgery, previous penetrating keratoplasty, uveitis, pediatric, and congenital anterior segment disorders. The tools and methods reported in the literature to accomplish DMEK in complex eyes vary widely with no particular consensus or standardization of techniques. The outcomes noted for some of these conditions demonstrate the difficulty of the surgery and the uncertainty of long-term graft survival in complex eyes. Both surgical standardization and randomized prospective data will better help elucidate DMEK's role in the corneal rehabilitation of complex eyes.
The current review aims to describe recent advancements in treatment of corneal ectasias and its effect on indications for corneal transplantation.
The majority of patients affected by ectatic corneal disease use contact lenses to correct resulting astigmatism. Patients who are intolerant of contact lenses or cannot achieve acceptable vision through conservative measures could consider keratoplasty. However, continuing advancements in both nonsurgical and surgical treatments are either reducing or delaying the need for keratoplasty in patients affected by ectatic corneal disease.
Corneal transplantation has been the mainstay of treatment for patients with advanced ectatic corneal disease. In the past decade, numerous improvements have been occurred to make contact lenses not only more effective for visual correction, but also more comfortable. Although corneal cross-linking is the only proven treatment known to prevent progression of disease, several other therapies show early potential for those in which cross-linking is contraindicated. Patients now have access to a wider range of therapies before considering keratoplasty.
Corneal transplantation has been the mainstay of treatment for patients with advanced ectatic corneal disease. In the past decade, numerous improvements have been occurred to make contact lenses not only more effective for visual correction, but also more comfortable. Although corneal cross-linking is the only proven treatment known to prevent progression of disease, several other therapies show early potential for those in which cross-linking is contraindicated. Patients now have access to a wider range of therapies before considering keratoplasty.
The purpose of this review is to give an overview of the corneal manifestations of targeted systemic immunotherapies and provide guidelines for management when applicable.
The advent of newer systemic immunosuppressive therapy has resulted in the need for more awareness of potential ocular side effects. Side effects can range from vortex keratopathy as seen with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, to epithelial microcysts as reported in the use of cytarabine and belantamab mafodotin, spontaneous corneal perforations have been reported with programmed death 1 inhibitors, while eyelid cicatrization has been reported epidermal growth factor inhibitors. Several immunomodulatory therapies result in conjunctivitis which tends to respond to topical lubrication and corticosteroid treatment. Most manifestations listed in the review are limited to the anterior segment; however, some may lead to retinal and optic nerve changes which can be permanently damaging.
Ocular surface and corneal changes secondary to systemic immunosuppression can affect main components of the ocular surface. Although most adverse effects are reversible, few changes can be permanent and therefore close ophthalmologic monitoring is necessary.
Ocular surface and corneal changes secondary to systemic immunosuppression can affect main components of the ocular surface. Although most adverse effects are reversible, few changes can be permanent and therefore close ophthalmologic monitoring is necessary.
The current review highlights areas of innovation and research in the use of contact lenses in the treatment of corneal ectasia and ocular surface disease.
A series of academic reports were published by a committee of experts reviewing evidence-based practice patterns of contact lens use. There continues to be active research in the use of contact lenses in the management of keratoconus, including mini-scleral lenses, custom impression-based scleral lenses and wavefront-guided scleral lenses. Recent reports on contact lenses for ocular surface disease were primarily reviews, retrospective case reports or case series, with publications on contact lens use in corneal epithelial defects, graft-vs.-host disease, limbal stem cell deficiency and neurotrophic keratitis. There are recent publications on advances in drug-eluting contact lenses.
Corneal specialists should be aware of current advances in the field of contact lens expanding their use in corneal ectasia and ocular surface disease.
Corneal specialists should be aware of current advances in the field of contact lens expanding their use in corneal ectasia and ocular surface disease.
Corneal graft rejection has been reported after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the literature regarding corneal graft rejection after vaccination, including rejection rates and risk factors. We aim to create a framework to identify patients who are at higher risk for graft rejection and may warrant consideration of prophylactic interventions.
Graft rejection has been reported following administration of mRNA, viral vector, and inactivated whole-virion COVID-19 vaccines. Most cases had additional risk factors associated with rejection. Vaccination increases circulation of proinflammatory cytokines, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses, and antispike neutralizing antibody, all of which may contribute to graft rejection. Two prospective studies have found no relationship between recent vaccination and rejection but 20% of cornea specialists report to have seen a vaccine-associated rejection and 22% recommend delaying vaccination in certain circumstances. Many specialists recommend prophylactic topical corticosteroids before and after vaccination to mitigate rejection risk but there is no evidence to support this practice on a wider scale.
My Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Vorinostat-saha.html
|
Notes.io is a web-based application for taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000 notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 12 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team