Notesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb108/eb108e1225c6a34726896a3a71243e18df6f7721" alt="what is notes.io? What is notes.io?"
![]() ![]() Notes - notes.io |
Most studies investigating antipsychotic effectiveness report either total psychopathology or symptom cluster findings. Studies focusing on a separate symptom, such as hallucinations, a hallmark symptom in schizophrenia, are scarce.Therefore, the current study aims to compare the antihallucinatory effectiveness of 3 pharmacologically different antipsychotics olanzapine, amisulpride, and aripiprazole.
The present study is part of the Bergen-Stavanger-Innsbruck-Trondheim study, a 12-month prospective, randomized, pragmatic antipsychotic drug trial in active-phase schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The primary outcome of the present study was change of hallucinations as measured by item P3 (hallucinatory behavior) from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale in the subgroup with hallucinations at baseline. Primary analyses were intention to treat.
A total of 144 participants were included in the study, where 105 (72%) had a score of 3 or more on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale P3 item at baseline, indicating the presence of hallucinations (HALL subgroup).In the HALL subgroup, a significantly less reduction of hallucinations was revealed for participants using olanzapine in weeks 12, 26, 39, and 52 when compared with amisulpride and in weeks 26 and 52 when compared with aripiprazole. In subanalyses for participants never exposed to antipsychotic drugs (antipsychotic-naive) and those who had used antipsychotics before entering the study, antihallucinatory differences were revealed only in the latter group.
A differential antihallucinatory effect of the 3 study drugs was present. The inferior effect of olanzapine seems to be driven by the subgroup of participants exposed to antipsychotic treatment before entering the study.
A differential antihallucinatory effect of the 3 study drugs was present. The inferior effect of olanzapine seems to be driven by the subgroup of participants exposed to antipsychotic treatment before entering the study.
New diagnoses of HIV increasingly occur among people who fall outside traditional transmission risk categories. This group remains poorly defined and HIV prevention efforts for this group lag behind efforts for patients in other risk groups.
We conducted a retrospective review of patient visits at sexual health clinics in Boston, Massachusetts over a 14-month period. Patients were classified into CDC-defined HIV transmission risk categories. We compared frequencies of STIs, HIV, PrEP indications, and PrEP prescriptions. Predictors of HIV or STI among patients in the undetermined risk category were assessed with logistic regression.
There were 4723 clinic visits during the study period. Patients in the undetermined risk group constituted the largest proportion (55.8%), followed by men who have sex with men (MSM) (42.7%). The proportion of visits by patients in the undetermined risk group with an indication for PrEP was low (28.0%) compared to MSM (91.3%) and MSM who also inject drugs (93.8%), however, the absolute number was high (737). Among patients with an indication for PrEP, those in the undetermined risk group were least likely to receive a prescription. Behavioral risk factors were poorly predictive of STI or HIV among patients in the undetermined risk group.
Patients with undetermined risk for HIV constituted a large proportion of clinic visits and had a large volume of sexual health needs but rarely received PrEP when indicated. To end the HIV epidemic in the US, prevention efforts must include people who fall outside traditional risk categories.
Patients with undetermined risk for HIV constituted a large proportion of clinic visits and had a large volume of sexual health needs but rarely received PrEP when indicated. To end the HIV epidemic in the US, prevention efforts must include people who fall outside traditional risk categories.
Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at increased risk of anogenital HPV infections. We aimed to assess the incidence and clearance of penile high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infections and their determinants among HIV-negative MSM living in the Netherlands.
Between 2010 and 2015, HIV-negative MSM were semi-annually tested for penile HPV and completed detailed questionnaires on health and sexual behaviour. Self-collected penile swabs were tested for HPV DNA using SPF10-PCR DEIA/LiPA25 system. Type-specific hrHPV incidence (IR) and clearance rates (CR) were calculated for 12 hrHPV types (HPV-16, -18, -31, -33, -35, -39, -45, -51, -52, -56, -58 and -59). Determinants of incidence and clearance of HPV-16 and HPV-18, separately, and combined 7 hrHPV types covered by the nonavalent vaccine were assessed by Poisson regression, using generalized estimating equations for combined hrHPV types.
We included 638 HIV-negative MSM, with a median age of 38 (interquartile range 33-43) years. HPV-16 had an IR of 4.9/1000 person-months of observation at risk (PMO) (95%-confidence interval (95%-CI) 3.8-6.3) and CR of 90.6/1000 PMO (95%-CI 60.7-135.1). The IR and CR of HPV-18 were 3.4/1000 PMO (95%-CI 2.5-4.5) and 119.2/1000 PMO (95%-CI 76.9-184.8), respectively. Age and condom use during insertive anal sex were not associated with hrHPV incidence, whereas, high number of recent sex partners was.
The relatively high incidence and low clearance rate of penile HPV-16 and also HPV-18 among HIV-negative MSM correlates with their high prevalence and oncogenic potential. Incident HPV-infections were associated with recent sexual risk behavior.
The relatively high incidence and low clearance rate of penile HPV-16 and also HPV-18 among HIV-negative MSM correlates with their high prevalence and oncogenic potential. Incident HPV-infections were associated with recent sexual risk behavior.
The National Sexually Transmitted Diseases Curriculum is an e-learning platform. New registrations and learning group creations in March to April 2020 were compared with previous 12-month data. Substantial increases in registrations and learning groups demonstrate that the National Sexually Transmitted Diseases Curriculum was successfully leveraged to meet rapidly shifting training needs due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The National Sexually Transmitted Diseases Curriculum is an e-learning platform. New registrations and learning group creations in March to April 2020 were compared with previous 12-month data. Substantial increases in registrations and learning groups demonstrate that the National Sexually Transmitted Diseases Curriculum was successfully leveraged to meet rapidly shifting training needs due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Chlamydia and gonorrhea are 2 of the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) worldwide. Rising chlamydia and gonorrhea rates along with increased closing of STI clinics has led many to seek STI testing in clinical settings such as urgent cares and walk-in clinics. However, with competing priorities, providing effective and efficient STI care can be difficult in these settings. This has left a growing need for the implementation of novel STI screening programs in other clinical settings. This review summarizes previous studies that have evaluated the clinical implementation of chlamydia and gonorrhea screening programs in these settings. Literature from January 2015 to February 2020 regarding the implementation or evaluation of STI screening programs in clinical settings was reviewed. Constructs from the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior model were used to organize results, as this model can aid in identifying specific strategies for behavior/process change interventions.acilities including sexual health clinics, urgent cares, walk-in clinics, and university health clinics. learn more When implementing new STI screening programs, sample-first, test-and-go services and molecular point-of-care (POC) testing approaches were found to be effective in increasing screening and reducing costs and time to treatment. At the health care systems level, these programs can help reduce STI screening costs and generate additional revenue for clinics. At the provider level, clear communication and guidance can help clinical and administrative staff in adopting new screening programs. Finally, at the patient level, new programs can reduce time to treatment and travel costs in visiting clinics multiple times for testing and treatment services.
Basic concussion symptom knowledge is fundamental to concussion identification; however, racial disparities in concussion knowledge exist in high school and youth sports. It is unknown whether similar differences exist in collegiate-athletes. Identifying racial disparities in concussion knowledge and sources of concussion information is essential to inform equitable approaches to knowledge translation and educational interventions. This study examined how Black and White collegiate-athletes differed in their knowledge of concussion symptoms and use of concussion information sources.
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) institutions.
Collegiate-athletes.
Cross-sectional.
Collegiate-athletes completed a questionnaire that assessed personal and sports demographics, concussion symptom knowledge, and use of concussion information sources. Fisher's exact tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests examined differences in outcome measures between Black and White collegiate-athletes. A multivariable Poissound to have lower concussion knowledge than White collegiate-athletes. The findings highlight the need for equitable strategies to disseminate concussion information to diverse populations by improving the physician-patient relationship and investing in culturally appropriate educational materials.
Despite NCAA concussion education requirements for athletes, Black collegiate-athletes were found to have lower concussion knowledge than White collegiate-athletes. The findings highlight the need for equitable strategies to disseminate concussion information to diverse populations by improving the physician-patient relationship and investing in culturally appropriate educational materials.
Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) significantly improve the outcomes of patients with rib fractures. Ultrasound is a specific modality for localizing rib fractures. We hypothesized that use of perioperative ultrasound localization of fracture sites optimizes surgical approach and clinical outcomes.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing SSRF, and compared those with and without adjunctive perioperative US fracture localization. Our primary outcome was improved surgical efficiency as measured by incision length and total operative time. Secondary clinical outcomes included numeric pain score on follow up visit and daily morphine milligram equivalent prescribed within 30 days from discharge.
We performed 49 surgical rib fixations between 2015 and 2020; of which, 13 (26.5%) additionally underwent ultrasound localization (26.5%). There were no significant differences between groups in age, gender, number of ribs repaired, or days till surgery. More patients in thail chest wall injury (76.9% vs 27.8%, p=0.003). Use of perioperative US was associated with shorter incision length (median 9 vs 15.5 cm, p=0.0001), shorter operative time (median 120 vs 174 min, p=0.003), less daily MME (25 vs 68 mg, p=0.009), and reduced numeric pain score on follow up (median 4 vs 7, p=0.05).Conclusions Use of perioperative ultrasound localization of rib fractures to optimize surgical approach for SSRF was associated with reduced incision length, operative time, and opioid requirements on patient discharge. We recommend considering routine perioperative localization to improve surgical approach and efficiency during SSRF.Level of evidence Level III, Therapeutic.
Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ljh685.html
![]() |
Notes is a web-based application for online taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000+ notes created and continuing...
With notes.io;
- * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
- * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
- * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
- * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
- * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.
Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.
Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!
Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )
Free: Notes.io works for 14 years and has been free since the day it was started.
You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio
Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io
Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio
Regards;
Notes.io Team