Notes

Supercapacitive biofuel cellular material.
While the technology appears to be safe and increasingly utilized, there have been few prospective clinical trials and most published studies combine different pathologies in the same report.

Well-designed prospective trials will be required to firmly establish the role of LITT in the treatment of lesions of the brain and spine.
Well-designed prospective trials will be required to firmly establish the role of LITT in the treatment of lesions of the brain and spine.
Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a method of targeted, local drug delivery to the central nervous system (CNS) that bypasses the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and permits the delivery of high-dose therapeutics to large volumes of interest while limiting associated systemic toxicities. Since its inception, CED has undergone considerable preclinical and clinical study as a safe method for treating glioblastoma (GBM). However, the heterogeneity of both, the surgical procedure and the mechanisms of action of the agents studied-combined with the additional costs of performing a trial evaluating CED-has limited the field's ability to adequately assess the durability of any potential anti-tumor responses. As a result, the long-term efficacy of the agents studied to date remains difficult to assess.

We searched PubMed using the phrase "convection-enhanced delivery and glioblastoma". The references of significant systematic reviews were also reviewed for additional sources. Articles focusing on physiological and physical mechanisms of CED were included as well as technological CED advances.

We review the history and principles of CED, procedural advancements and characteristics, and outcomes from key clinical trials, as well as discuss the potential future of this promising technique for the treatment of GBM.

While the long-term efficacy of the agents studied to date remains difficult to assess, CED remains a promising technique for the treatment of GBM.
While the long-term efficacy of the agents studied to date remains difficult to assess, CED remains a promising technique for the treatment of GBM.
Resection of pituitary adenomas presents a number of unique challenges in neuro-oncology. The proximity of these lesions to key vascular and endocrine structures as well as the need to interpret neuronavigation in the context of shifting tumor position increases the complexity of the operation. More recently, substantial advances in fluorescence-guided surgery have been demonstrated to facilitate the identification of numerous tumor types and result in increased rates of complete resection and overall survival.

A review of the literature was performed, and data regarding the mechanism of the fluorescence agents, their administration, and intraoperative tumor visualization were extracted. DNA Repair inhibitor Both in vitro and in vivo studies were assessed. The application of these agents to pituitary tumors, their advantages and limitations, as well as future directions are presented here.

Numerous laboratory and clinical studies have described the use of 5-ALA, fluorescein, indocyanine green, and OTL38 in pituitary lesions. All of these drugs have been demonstrated to accumulate in tumor cells. Several studies have reported the successful use of the majority of the agents in inducing intraoperative tumor fluorescence. However, their sensitivity and specificity varies across the literature and between functioning and non-functioning adenomas.

At present, numerous studies have shown the feasibility and safety of these agents for pituitary adenomas. However, further research is needed to assess the applicability of fluorescence-guided surgery across different tumor subtypes as well as explore the relationship between their use and postoperative clinical outcomes.
At present, numerous studies have shown the feasibility and safety of these agents for pituitary adenomas. However, further research is needed to assess the applicability of fluorescence-guided surgery across different tumor subtypes as well as explore the relationship between their use and postoperative clinical outcomes.
Label-free Raman-based imaging techniques create the possibility of bringing chemical and histologic data into the operation room. Relying on the intrinsic biochemical properties of tissues to generate image contrast and optical tissue sectioning, Raman-based imaging methods can be used to detect microscopic tumor infiltration and diagnose brain tumor subtypes.

Here, we review the application of three Raman-based imaging methods to neurosurgical oncology Raman spectroscopy, coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy, and stimulated Raman histology (SRH).

Raman spectroscopy allows for chemical characterization of tissue and can differentiate normal and tumor-infiltrated tissue based on variations in macromolecule content, both ex vivo and in vivo. To improve signal-to-noise ratio compared to conventional Raman spectroscopy, a second pulsed excitation laser can be used to coherently drive the vibrational frequency of specific Raman active chemical bonds (i.e. symmetric stretching of -CH
bonnfiltration, guiding tumor biopsy/resection, and providing images for histopathologic and molecular diagnosis.
Despite recent advances in treatment for a number of cancers with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), immunotherapy has had limited efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM). The recent multi-centered CheckMate 143 trial in first time recurrent GBM and the Checkmate 498 trial in newly diagnosed unmethylated GBM showed that antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) failed to improve overall survival in patients with GBM. Recent preclinical and clinical studies have explored combining ICB with several other therapies including additional ICB against alternative checkpoint molecules, activation of costimulatory checkpoint molecules such as 4-1BB, radiation-induced tumor cell lysis and immunogenic recruitment, local chemotherapy, neoadjuvant ICB therapy, and myeloid cell reactivation.

We have reviewed the literature on ICB seminal to the progression of several preclinical studies and clinical trials in order to provide a compendium of the current state of combination immunotherapy for GBM. For ongoing clinn was observed in multiple different combination strategies for GBM in both preclinical and clinical studies, indicating that ICB combination therapy results in a significant immunological impact on the tumor microenvironment.
Despite the lack of clinical survival benefit, immune modulation was observed in multiple different combination strategies for GBM in both preclinical and clinical studies, indicating that ICB combination therapy results in a significant immunological impact on the tumor microenvironment.
Most clinical trials in neurooncology are led by investigators primarily trained in neurology or medical oncology. While neurosurgeons are trained to be problem-solvers and innovators, research training has historically been focused on laboratory-based discovery approaches and formalized training in prospective clinical trials research is not part of routine graduate training.

We reviewed literature that demonstrates that innovation and problem-solving are integral to the practice of neurosurgery cite multiple examples of advances in technique and technology that may have had an empirical origin but that led to prospective clinical trials resulting in change in practice.

Neurosurgeons have developed and led both traditional (clinical outcome-oriented) and translational prospective clinical trials that have evaluated the best use of currently available therapeutics or tested the ability of novel therapeutics to alter the biology and/or course of disease.

In this review, we focus on a number of the recently developed technologies and therapeutics that were evaluated in clinical trials led or co-led by neurosurgeons. We also highlight some of the barriers that need to be addressed in order to foster neurosurgical participation and leadership in the prospective development of novel therapeutics.
In this review, we focus on a number of the recently developed technologies and therapeutics that were evaluated in clinical trials led or co-led by neurosurgeons. We also highlight some of the barriers that need to be addressed in order to foster neurosurgical participation and leadership in the prospective development of novel therapeutics.
Evidence-based medicine guidelines are increasingly published and sanctioned by organized neurosurgery. However, implementation, interpretation, and use of clinical guidelines may vary substantially on a regional, national and international basis. Survey research can help bridge the gap by providing a snapshot of neurosurgeon attitudes, knowledge, and practices. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AANS/CNS) Section on Tumors formed a Survey Committee to formalize the process by which surveys are submitted and reviewed before distribution to our membership. The goal of this committee is to provide peer-review so that collected information will be scientifically robust and useful to the neurosurgical community.

Surveys submitted to the AANS/CNS tumor section between 2015 and 2019 were reviewed and metrics such as response rate and publication status assessed.

Six surveys were submitted to the Survey Committee of the AANS/CNS section on tumors between 2015 and 2019. Four have been circulated to section members, of which three have been published. Response rate has averaged 19% (range 16-23%), a majority of respondents (mean 70%) practice in academic settings.

The AANS/CNS Section on Tumors Survey Committee has and continues to help promote and improve the practice of surveying our community to answer important questions that can advance future training, research, and practice. There remains significant room for improvement in response rates, but ongoing tumor section efforts to increase member engagement will likely improve these numbers.
The AANS/CNS Section on Tumors Survey Committee has and continues to help promote and improve the practice of surveying our community to answer important questions that can advance future training, research, and practice. There remains significant room for improvement in response rates, but ongoing tumor section efforts to increase member engagement will likely improve these numbers.
Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines in the management of central nervous system tumors (CNS) continue to be developed and updated through the work of the Joint Section on Tumors of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS).

The guidelines are created using the most current and clinically relevant evidence using systematic methodologies, which classify available data and provide recommendations for clinical practice.

This update summarizes the Tumor Section Guidelines developed over the last five years for non-functioning pituitary adenomas, low grade gliomas, vestibular schwannomas, and metastatic brain tumors.
This update summarizes the Tumor Section Guidelines developed over the last five years for non-functioning pituitary adenomas, low grade gliomas, vestibular schwannomas, and metastatic brain tumors.
Read More: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/elimusertib-bay-1895344-.html