Notes

Erect Built-in Relaxation Stress Anticipates Indicator End result pertaining to Esophagogastric 4 way stop Outflow Obstruction.
Growing evidence points to systematic linkages in various physiological indices among romantic partners. This physiological synchrony may facilitate intimacy and connectedness in couples. However, synchronous increases in physiological arousal could also hamper the respective partners' health. To shed light on the consequences of physiological synchrony as well as their potential gender specificity, the current study examined associations between everyday cortisol synchrony and levels of and subsequent changes to relationship satisfaction and non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol levels over a 3-year period. Tofacitinib molecular weight Older couples (N = 85; age range = 60-87 years) provided saliva samples for cortisol estimation 5 times daily for 7 days. They further reported their relationship satisfaction and provided a blood sample that was analyzed for lipid levels up to three times in 1-year intervals. Data were analyzed using dyadic growth curve models. Among wives, higher cortisol synchrony was associated with stronger increases in relationship satisfaction over time (b = 1.61, p = .011) but also stronger increases in non-HDL cholesterol levels over time (b = 2.02, p = .042). For husbands, higher cortisol synchrony was not significantly associated with levels or changes of relationship satisfaction but with higher non-HDL cholesterol levels at Time 1 (b = 6.54, p = .015). Synchrony may be important for bonding and relationship maintenance. However, being strongly linked to a romantic partner's physiology may also have health costs due to the accumulative burden of repeated elevations in cortisol, possibly affecting husbands and wives in different ways. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).We proposed that individuals from upper-class backgrounds are more effective at job search than their working-class counterparts in the white-collar labor market. We further proposed that this is partly because upper-class individuals adopt different job search strategies. Our predictions were tested with a time-lagged multisource survey (Study 1) and a 4-wave, 2-month longitudinal survey (Study 2) of business student job seekers. Study 1 found that parental income strengthened the relationship between job search intensity and job search success and that this interaction was mediated by a less haphazard job search strategy. Parental income also strengthened the relationship between job interviews and job offers. Study 2 mostly replicated these findings while showing that the effects generalize to other facets of class background. Study 2 additionally explored mechanisms for why working-class individuals use a more haphazard job search strategy. Although class background positively predicted social capital and social capital negatively predicted a haphazard strategy, social capital did not mediate the negative relationship between class background and a haphazard strategy. Finally, although working-class individuals use a more haphazard strategy on average, exploratory analyses show that those with high psychological capital start with a more haphazard strategy but progress to a low haphazard strategy within two months-on par with upper-class individuals. Conversely, working-class individuals with low psychological capital maintained a more haphazard approach over time. Our findings add new insights into how individuals can conduct a more effective job search and why class inequality remains so durable. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).During normal and predictable circumstances, employees' occupational calling (i.e., a transcendent passion to use their talent and competencies toward positive societal impact and a sense of meaningfulness derived from working in a chosen occupational domain) is observed to be relatively stable. However, with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, circumstances have become anything but normal and predictable, thus putting employees' sense of occupational calling to the test. In this study, we investigate the possibility that occupational calling fluctuates across days during situations of crisis, and we identify antecedents and consequence of such fluctuations. To test our model, we conducted a daily diary study of 66 nurses working in intensive care units over 5 consecutive work days in a specialized Wuhan hospital that only admitted confirmed COVID-19 patients during the peak of the pandemic in China. We found that the daily number of code blue events (i.e., cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts with the primary goal of patient revival) was positively related to daily occupational calling for nurses. Moreover, individual differences in prosocial motivation predicted the average level and variability of occupational calling over the 5 days, which subsequently related to the nurses' job performance. Our study sheds light on how occupational calling enables people with the needed occupational knowledge and skills to function effectively in crisis situations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).There are several existing typologies of dual-earner couples focused on how they dually manage work and family; however, these all assume that couples can outsource childcare during normal work hours and that work is largely conducted outside of the home. Early attempts to control COVID-19 altered these assumptions with daycares/schools closing and the heavy shift to remote work. This calls into question whether couples tended to fall back on familiar gendered patterns to manage work and family, or if they adopted new strategies for the unique pandemic situation. We addressed this question using a sample of 274 dual-earner couples with young children. We content coded couples' qualitative responses about their plans for managing childcare and work commitments and used these codes in a latent class analysis to identify subgroups. Seven classes were identified, with 36.6% of the sample using strategies where women did most or all childcare, 18.9% of the sample using strategies that were not clearly gendered or egalitarian, and 44.5% of the sample using unique egalitarian strategies. We also obtained data from 133 of these couples approximately 7 weeks later regarding their well-being and job performance. Results suggested that women in the Remote Wife Does It All class had the lowest well-being and performance. There were nuanced differences between the egalitarian strategies in their relationships with outcomes, with the Alternating Days egalitarian category emerging as the overall strategy that best preserved wives' and husbands' well-being while allowing both to maintain adequate job performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Website: https://www.selleckchem.com/products/CP-690550.html