Notes

>>756134
>Which itself balances with picking reincident criminals and locking a single incident with 1 a multiple charge
That doesn't balance shit. I don't know how you're even coming to these conclusions but incarcerating two innocent people doesn't "make up" for a criminal getting away, it only adds fuel to the fire. You're basically fucking over someone's livelihood because someone who looked like them is alleged to have committed a crime.
>your data has no context, is a completely shallow data because you give no furthee implicationswere they re-incident?,
That's a moot point, what that article and I were saying was that regardless of the cause, a study found that black people are exponentially more likely to be wrongfully convicted for an assortment of crimes, and this is an exemplar of white privilege. Black people committing more crime in the first place is also indicative of white privilege as I explained
>Thousands of cases distributed arround several years won't make a statistical difference
They very much will especially when there have been other police scandals that aren't as high profile which we haven't been hearing about
>if you want to pull the idea that a big margin of blacks get represented in crime statistics for this you may aswell just go and provide evidence, otherwise your argument could mean that in fact blacks may be underrepresented.
For starters there's the study reported by vox and the marijuana posession stats I referenced. Then we have

>Police kill a disproportionate number of black people
https://www.vox.com/identities/2016/8/13/17938186/police-shootings-killings-racism-racial-disparities

>Black drivers more likely to be stopped by police (an indirect one)
https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2020/may/black-drivers-more-likely-to-be-stopped-by-police.html

And a few more. Pretty clear that you're denying it and trying to find idealist loopholes out of white fragility

>No, not really, they are examples of how low socioeconomically positioned ghettos tend to get wrong convictions
You mean black ghettos? Cause the poorest white areas in West Virginia, Penn., etc. still have lower wrong conviction rates than black neighborhoods
>Which i am expecting you to provide, repeating that this magical white privilege you perceive like a godlike entity
I already did several times itt. Black people have criminal inclinations because of the link between poverty and crime, they have little inheritance because the consequences of slavery persist today and sometimes are forced into a life of crime as their means of subsistence. And I don't believe in white privilege "like a godlike entity", on the contrary your ''denial'' of white privilege is dogmatic and has more resemblance to superstition. I believe in white privilege because as it stands the empirical evidence we have strongly suggests that white privilege is a real phenomenon, something which most sociologists agree with. On the other hand you're conveniently denying the statistics we have and finding excuses "um but Chud, black people getting wrongfully convicted 12 times as often doesn't actually matter because repeat offenders exist".
>What is interesting about murders is that you wont be able of faking one, so unless you can prove that they get wrongfully convicted IN THE PLACE of white people and not other black people your argument falls flat
There have been cases of that happening. Any I don't think you're following the argument. It's
>Black people are more likely to be wrongfully convicted for just existing
>White people don't have to deal with this issue
>Therefore black people have a reduced quality of life compared to whites in this category hence this is a form of white privilege
>>Criticizing white people in writing or speech without getting imprisoned doesn't
Finish the sentence
>doesn't somehow make white privilege non-existent
>Eh yes, it does anon, giving constants speechs about how a group of people is morally evil, be it whatever it is, and as such is fine to demonize it gives not only a moral permission and justification but a direct incentive to be racist and discriminative against it,
Snowflake, I already explained how criticizing the nazis or indian boarding schools or whatever isn't "anti-white". And you're just cherry picking this one single point which might offend white people. Your ancestors being insulted is trivial compared to what black Americans deal with on a daily basis
>I don't know anonmay it be because you instated that being discriminated openly by society is part of privilege of other group? Blacks use derogatory slurs all day against white people, yet, viceversa is actually llegal and its considered a social taboo.
Ah yes I point out discrimination so the logical conclusion is to cherry pick a relatively unprevalant form of discrimination to prove that white privilege isn't real, makes perfect sense. Black people NEVER use derogatory slurs against white people. I have heard a black guy say "cracker" once and he was just joking around with his white friends, it wasn't even meant as an insult because it's nothing.
>while you are stablishing correlations and subsequently creating conspirancies and establishing causalities that you have no evidence of, i gave you a very direct case of discrimination against whites by the legal aparatus that is openly given, can you do the same?
Chuddy