Notes

Wikipedia Review Testimonial is an Internet discussion forum and blog for the discussion of Wikimedia Foundation projects
Wikipedia Review is an Net forum and blog for the conversation of Wikimedia Structure tasks, in particular the web content as well as conflicts of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Evaluation is a Wikipedia watchdog website, scrutinizing Wikipedia and also reporting on its problems. It supplies an independent forum to review Wikipedia editors as well as their influence on Wikipedia content. At its optimal, participants included existing Wikipedia editors, former Wikipedia editors, users banned from Wikipedia, and also individuals who had never edited.

The website was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", as well as hosted by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it relocated to its very own domain name using Invision Power Board software application. The site needed enrollment utilizing a valid e-mail address to publish as well as blacklisted e-mail carriers that allowed privacy so regarding prevent the operation of numerous accounts by a solitary customer.

Useful Link reviews was mentioned for its discussion of wiki-editing principles and also its engagement in the evaluation of the Palo Alto Study Business's WikiDashboard.

Commentary
Wikipedia Review is not a conspiracy theory, a team-building workout, a parlor game, or an experiment in collusion. It is not suggested as a resource or training school for those who would infuse worry and also misery in others. It does not exist to corrupt, but to expose corruption; it does not exist to tear down institutions, yet to expose the ways in which establishments are taken apart; it does not exist to dislike, however is implied to reveal hate in others. To expose these things is not wicked. It is not a monolithic entity, nor the amount of its components. Like-mindedness does not indicate singularity of objective; regard for the civil liberties of one group does not indicate disrespect for the legal rights of another. It is not intended to be predictable, constant, or boring.

Imagine a globe in which humans are not individual accounts, are not programmable, as well as are not plain words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...

-- Statement made when the website ran out solution in 2008, Wikipedia Evaluation
Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Evaluation has actually provided a focal point for examination right into Wikipedia-related matters such as the "Essjay controversy". Cade Metz, writing for The Register, attributed Wikipedia Evaluation with the exploration of a exclusive subscriber list that led to the resignation of a Wikipedia manager; he additionally composed that a Wikipedia proposition called "BADSITES" intended to ban the reference of Wikipedia Testimonial and similar websites on Wikipedia. The Independent kept in mind that " accusations against specific managers came to a head on a website called Wikipedia Evaluation, where people dispute the administrators' actions." Have A Peek At This Web-Site solutions recommended visiting Wikipedia Review in order to " comply with conflicts, conversations, editors and basic bureaucracy on Wikipedia". Philip Coppens utilized blog posts made on Wikipedia Evaluation to assist build a report, published in Nexus Publication, on WikiScanner and also claims that intelligence agencies had actually been using Wikipedia to spread disinformation.

Material as well as framework
Wikipedia Review's openly easily accessible forums are broken up into 4 general topic areas:

Discussion forum information;
Wikimedia-oriented discussion, which has subforums concentrating on editors, the Wikipedia administration, meta conversation, posts and also general Wikimedia-focused subjects not fitting in other places;
Media forums containing a information feed and also discussion concerning information as well as blogs featuring Wikipedia/Wikimedia; and
Off subject, non-Wikimedia related conversation.
References

Here's my website: https://github.com/nixsolutions